Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frappe

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No

Frappe
Developer Tools
The Python web framework behind ERPNext, sold as managed hosting through Frappe Cloud
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Frappe has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; Frappe the framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Frappe covers DocType modelling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and Frappe actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | Frappe |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | Per month by site or server |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web, Linux, Docker |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in Frappe
- DocType modelling
- Role and field permissions
- Built-in REST API
- Background jobs
- Bench CLI
- Frappe Cloud hosting
- App marketplace
- Multi-tenancy
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot Frappe
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot Frappe
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot Frappe
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot Frappe
Frappe
- A team building an internal business application that needs permissions, audit trail and an API on day one rather than in month threenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- An ERPNext user who wants managed hosting, automatic updates and offsite backups without hiring a systems administratornot Entrust Identity as a Service
- An Indian or emerging-market business that wants to pay for application hosting in local currency at local price pointsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- A consultancy shipping custom vertical apps to clients on a shared framework with per-client site isolationnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
Frappe
- The framework is strongly opinionated: its own ORM, templating and job queue mean general Python and Django experience transfers only partly, and onboarding a new developer takes weeks rather than days.
- The developer pool is small and heavily concentrated in India, so hiring Frappe experience elsewhere is slow and expensive relative to mainstream stacks.
- Documentation is uneven in depth and lags behind releases in places, so real answers often come from reading the source or the community forum.
- Major version upgrades of the framework have historically broken custom apps that reach past the DocType layer, so bespoke code carries a recurring maintenance cost at each upgrade.
- Frappe Cloud recommends against its cheapest Hetzner-backed option for mission-critical production, so the headline $5 entry price is not the price of a production-grade deployment.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
Frappe
Free- Framework, self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- Install with bench on your own Linux servers
- You carry updates, backups and security patching
- Frappe Cloud Sites$5/month
- Also listed at ₹410 per month
- Shared servers with 150+ installable apps
- Automatic updates and offsite backups
- Frappe Cloud Servers$40/month
- Also listed at ₹3,600 per month
- Dedicated or shared virtual machines
- Unlimited sites on your server
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose Frappe if
- You need doctype modelling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Docker.
- You also want role and field permissions.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or Frappe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and Frappe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or Frappe?
- Frappe has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for Frappe.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or Frappe run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. Frappe runs on Web, Linux, Docker.
- Can I use Frappe for free?
- Yes. Frappe has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what Frappe is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that Frappe cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. Frappe covers DocType modelling, Role and field permissions, Built-in REST API, Background jobs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
Frappe: Is Frappe the same as ERPNext?
No. Frappe is the framework; ERPNext is the ERP application written on it. You can run Frappe without ERPNext to build your own applications.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
Frappe: What licence is the framework under?
MIT, which is permissive and imposes no obligation to publish your changes, unlike the AGPL used by several open source ERP rivals.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
Frappe: Can I pay in rupees?
Yes. Frappe Cloud publishes the same plans in Indian rupees, ₹410 a month for sites and ₹3,600 for servers, rather than converting a dollar price at checkout.
Frappe: Do I have to use Frappe Cloud?
No, self-hosting with bench or Docker is fully supported and free. Frappe Cloud is a convenience purchase, and it funds the open source work.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Pants Build
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Helix
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Jitsu
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Steampipe
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Tilt
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Backstage
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Xlinesoft
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Penpot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GNU Emacs
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bazel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Eclipse IDE
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Keil MDK
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Vite
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Daytona
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Depot
- Frappe vs Cisco Duo
- Frappe vs JumpCloud
- Frappe vs Ping Identity
- Frappe vs Frontegg
- Frappe vs Authelia
- Frappe vs Beyond Identity
- Frappe vs Transmit Security
- Frappe vs Akeyless
- Frappe vs authentik
- Frappe vs Logto
- Frappe vs Speakeasy
- Frappe vs Authy
- Frappe vs ExpressVPN
- Frappe vs Falco
- Frappe vs Fenergo
- Frappe vs Google Authenticator
- Frappe vs Grype
- Frappe vs Hanwha Vision
- Frappe vs Pants Build
- Frappe vs Helix
- Frappe vs Jitsu
- Frappe vs Steampipe
- Frappe vs Tilt
- Frappe vs Backstage
- Frappe vs Xlinesoft
- Frappe vs Visual Studio Code
- Frappe vs Penpot
- Frappe vs GNU Emacs
- Frappe vs Bazel
- Frappe vs Eclipse IDE
- Frappe vs Keil MDK
- Frappe vs Vite
- Frappe vs Daytona
- Frappe vs Depot
