Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs GNU Emacs

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No
GNU Emacs
Developer Tools
Extensible, customizable free text editor and computing environment
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only GNU Emacs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; GNU Emacs steep learning curve for its default keybindings and Lisp-based configuration.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, GNU Emacs covers Emacs Lisp Extensibility.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and GNU Emacs actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | GNU Emacs |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | linux, mac, windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
| Founded | Unknown | 1984 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in GNU Emacs
- Emacs Lisp Extensibility
- Package Ecosystem
- Org Mode
- Built-in Version Control Interfaces
- Cross-platform
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot GNU Emacs
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot GNU Emacs
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot GNU Emacs
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot GNU Emacs
GNU Emacs
- Programming with deep Lisp-based customizationnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Note-taking and planning with Org modenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Managing email and file systems from a single environmentnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Long-term, keyboard-driven text editing workflowsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
GNU Emacs
- Steep learning curve for its default keybindings and Lisp-based configuration.
- Default UI looks dated compared to modern editors without heavy customization.
- Performance can lag on very large files compared to newer editors.
- Discoverability of features is poor without prior familiarity or external guides.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
GNU Emacs
Free- FreeFree
- Full editor and ecosystem, no paid tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose GNU Emacs if
- You need emacs lisp extensibility.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on linux, mac, windows.
- You also want package ecosystem.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or GNU Emacs better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and GNU Emacs at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or GNU Emacs?
- GNU Emacs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for GNU Emacs.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or GNU Emacs run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. GNU Emacs runs on linux, mac, windows.
- Can I use GNU Emacs for free?
- Yes. GNU Emacs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what GNU Emacs is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that GNU Emacs cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. GNU Emacs covers Emacs Lisp Extensibility, Package Ecosystem, Org Mode, Built-in Version Control Interfaces.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
GNU Emacs: Is GNU Emacs free, including for commercial use?
Yes, Emacs is free software released under the GNU General Public License, which allows anyone to use, study, modify, and redistribute it, including commercially.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
GNU Emacs: How do I install Emacs?
On Linux it is available via package managers like apt-get, pacman, dnf, or zypper; on macOS via Homebrew or MacPorts; on Windows via an installer or zip from GNU mirrors; and on Android via F-Droid or GNU FTP.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
GNU Emacs: What platforms does Emacs support?
Emacs runs on GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, Haiku, macOS, MS Windows, Android (versions 2.2 to 15.0), Solaris, and MS-DOS/FreeDOS.
SourceGNU Emacs: How is Emacs extended with packages?
Emacs is customized and extended through its Emacs Lisp dialect, with thousands of community packages distributed via repositories like MELPA that add language modes and tools.
SourceGNU Emacs: Where can I get source code or development builds?
Emacs source code and development builds are hosted at savannah.gnu.org, in addition to stable releases distributed through GNU mirrors.
SourceRelated pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Helix
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Notepad++
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Eclipse IDE
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Refact
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Penpot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Bazel
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Pants Build
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Swagger UI
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ansible
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Atlantis
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Jitsu
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Depot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Earthly
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Harness
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Moonrepo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nx Cloud
- GNU Emacs vs Cisco Duo
- GNU Emacs vs JumpCloud
- GNU Emacs vs Ping Identity
- GNU Emacs vs Frontegg
- GNU Emacs vs Authelia
- GNU Emacs vs Beyond Identity
- GNU Emacs vs Transmit Security
- GNU Emacs vs Akeyless
- GNU Emacs vs authentik
- GNU Emacs vs Logto
- GNU Emacs vs Speakeasy
- GNU Emacs vs Authy
- GNU Emacs vs ExpressVPN
- GNU Emacs vs Falco
- GNU Emacs vs Fenergo
- GNU Emacs vs Google Authenticator
- GNU Emacs vs Grype
- GNU Emacs vs Hanwha Vision
- GNU Emacs vs Helix
- GNU Emacs vs Notepad++
- GNU Emacs vs Eclipse IDE
- GNU Emacs vs Visual Studio Code
- GNU Emacs vs Refact
- GNU Emacs vs Penpot
- GNU Emacs vs Bazel
- GNU Emacs vs Pants Build
- GNU Emacs vs Swagger UI
- GNU Emacs vs Ansible
- GNU Emacs vs Atlantis
- GNU Emacs vs Jitsu
- GNU Emacs vs Depot
- GNU Emacs vs Earthly
- GNU Emacs vs Harness
- GNU Emacs vs Moonrepo
- GNU Emacs vs Nx Cloud
