Softwr

Sales Enablement · head to head

Common Room vs Endgame

Common Room logo

Common Room

Sales Enablement

Customer and community intelligence that stitches scattered person identities into one go-to-market signal feed

From
$2500/month
Rated
-
Endgame logo

Endgame

Sales Enablement

A context graph over CRM, calls and documents that answers account questions with citations

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Common Room the entry plan is 2,500 US dollars a month billed annually, a floor of 30,000 a year, which excludes exactly the early-stage community-led companies whose signal is strongest.; Endgame there is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.
  • They diverge on capability: Common Room covers Person360 identity resolution, Endgame covers Context graph.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Common Room and Endgame actually diverge.

Attributes where Common Room and Endgame differ
AttributeCommon RoomEndgame
Starting price$2500/monthOn request
Pricing modelPer month by contact volumequote
PlatformsWeb, Chrome extensionWeb

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Common Room

  • Person360 identity resolution
  • Community source ingestion
  • Signal alerts
  • Account and contact scoring
  • Website deanonymisation
  • RoomieAI research
  • Prospector
  • Intent data

Only in Endgame

  • Context graph
  • Cited answers
  • Account research briefs
  • Meeting and call prep
  • Deal inspection
  • Stakeholder mapping
  • Executive and QBR briefings

Both cover

  • MCP server

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Common Room

  • A developer tools company whose GitHub stars and Slack community contain buyers nobody has ever contacted because the handles do not match any CRM recordnot Endgame
  • A sales team that wants to be alerted when a former champion changes job to a target account, with the previous relationship attachednot Endgame
  • A marketing function trying to prove that community participation precedes pipeline, which requires joining community identity to opportunity datanot Endgame
  • A product-led business wanting to route free users who match the enterprise buyer profile to sellers based on both product usage and public activitynot Endgame

Endgame

  • An enterprise sales team on Salesforce and Gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day.not Common Room
  • A revenue organisation that has standardised on Claude or ChatGPT internally and wants those assistants grounded in real CRM and call data instead of hallucinating account history.not Common Room
  • A sales leadership team preparing quarterly business reviews from data spread across Salesforce, Snowflake, Gong and Notion.not Common Room
  • A new account executive inheriting a territory who needs the history of thirty accounts, including who was involved and what was promised, without reading two years of call recordings.not Common Room

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Common Room

  • The entry plan is 2,500 US dollars a month billed annually, a floor of 30,000 a year, which excludes exactly the early-stage community-led companies whose signal is strongest.
  • RoomieAI and Prospector run on credit allocations rather than unlimited use, so heavy research months exhaust the budget and the workflow stops until the next cycle or an upgrade.
  • Contact ceilings of 100,000 on Essential are consumed quickly by any sizeable public community, and the overage conversation is an upgrade to a quoted tier rather than an incremental charge.
  • Identity resolution is probabilistic, so wrong merges happen, and a seller who contacts the wrong person with context from someone else does more damage than no alert at all.
  • Signal volume overwhelms teams without a defined qualification rule; most implementations that fail do so because everything became an alert and sellers stopped reading them within a month.

Endgame

  • There is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.
  • The product has pivoted twice, from product-led sales signals to account intelligence to a GTM context graph, on a Series B raised in February 2022 with no publicly reported round since, which is real roadmap and data model risk on a multi-year contract.
  • Value depends heavily on Salesforce and Gong depth, so organisations on HubSpot or a different call recorder get a substantially thinner graph and a weaker product for the same negotiation.
  • Positioning as a context layer under other AI tools makes return on investment hard to attribute, because no user logs in and no workflow visibly belongs to it, which makes renewal conversations difficult to defend internally.
  • Vendor-published performance claims around accuracy, speed and cost reduction have no third-party benchmark behind them, and the independent review profile has been effectively inactive for over a year, so there is no current corpus to validate against.
  • As a layer rather than an application it is structurally exposed to Salesforce or Gong shipping equivalent native context, which would remove the reason to keep paying for it without any action on the vendor’s part.

Pricing, plan by plan

Common Room

$2500/month
  • Essential$2500/month
    • 5 seats
    • 100,000 contacts
    • Person360 enrichment and identity resolution
  • Advanced$undefined/year
    • 15 seats
    • 250,000 contacts
    • RoomieAI research, 7,500 credits
  • Enterprise$undefined/year
    • 30 seats
    • 750,000 contacts
    • RoomieAI research, 10,000 credits

Endgame

On request
  • Endgame$undefined/year
    • Context graph across CRM, calls, documents and email
    • Slack, Teams, web and CLI access
    • MCP server for external assistants

Which should you pick?

Choose Common Room if

  • You need person360 identity resolution.
  • You work on Web, Chrome extension.
  • You also want community source ingestion.

Choose Endgame if

  • You need context graph.
  • You also want cited answers.

Questions people ask

Is Common Room or Endgame better?
Neither clearly leads. Common Room starts at $2500/month and Endgame at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Common Room or Endgame?
Common Room starts at $2500/month and Endgame at On request.
Does Common Room or Endgame run on more platforms?
Common Room runs on Web, Chrome extension. Endgame runs on Web.
What is Common Room best used for?
Common Room is most often used for a developer tools company whose github stars and slack community contain buyers nobody has ever contacted because the handles do not match any crm record, a sales team that wants to be alerted when a former champion changes job to a target account, with the previous relationship attached, a marketing function trying to prove that community participation precedes pipeline, which requires joining community identity to opportunity data, a product-led business wanting to route free users who match the enterprise buyer profile to sellers based on both product usage and public activity. Of those, a developer tools company whose github stars and slack community contain buyers nobody has ever contacted because the handles do not match any crm record and a sales team that wants to be alerted when a former champion changes job to a target account, with the previous relationship attached are not what Endgame is typically brought in for.
What can Common Room do that Endgame cannot?
Common Room covers Person360 identity resolution, Community source ingestion, Signal alerts, Account and contact scoring. Endgame covers Context graph, Cited answers, Account research briefs, Meeting and call prep. Both handle MCP server.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Common Room: What does the entry plan actually cost?

2,500 US dollars per month billed annually, for 5 seats and 100,000 contacts. Higher tiers are quoted.

Endgame: Is this the Endgame that Elastic acquired?

No. That was an endpoint security company. This is Endgame, Inc. at endgame.io, an account intelligence and context platform for revenue teams.

Common Room: Is this only for developer tools companies?

It is strongest where there is a public community to observe. Companies with no community signal get a narrower version of the product and should compare it against ordinary intent data vendors.

Endgame: Is it still the product-led sales signals tool?

No. It pivoted twice. If your shortlist came from 2021 to 2023 coverage of PQL scoring, the product you would buy today is different.

Common Room: Does it replace ZoomInfo?

No. It is signal and identity resolution rather than a contact database, though Prospector covers some contact discovery within accounts.

Endgame: What does it cost?

Unpublished. There is no pricing page. Expect an enterprise annual contract negotiated per deal.

Common Room: How are AI features metered?

By credits per tier, from 5,000 RoomieAI credits on Essential up to 10,000 on Enterprise, with Prospector credits counted separately.

Endgame: Do I need Salesforce and Gong?

Not strictly, but the graph is built around them. On HubSpot or with another call recorder you get materially less value for the same price.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads