Legal · head to head
DISCO vs NetDocuments

DISCO
Legal
Cloud e-discovery priced by data volume, with review, legal hold and case preparation in one platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DISCO per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.; NetDocuments quote-only pricing per user with no published rates
- They diverge on capability: DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, NetDocuments covers Matter-centric filing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DISCO and NetDocuments actually diverge.
| Attribute | DISCO | NetDocuments |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Windows, iOS, Android, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DISCO
- All-in per-gigabyte pricing
- Cecilia AI
- Technology assisted review
- Legal hold
- Case Builder
- Self-service ingestion
Only in NetDocuments
- Matter-centric filing
- Ethical walls
- Email management
- Version control
- Search
- Retention
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DISCO
- A litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully knownnot NetDocuments
- A firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surgenot NetDocuments
- An in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of twonot NetDocuments
- A case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platformnot NetDocuments
NetDocuments
- Firms needing enforceable ethical walls rather than folder permissionsnot DISCO
- Capturing email into the matter record instead of individual inboxesnot DISCO
- Moving document management off on-premise serversnot DISCO
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DISCO
- Per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.
- Hosting is cloud only in United States regions, so matters with European, United Kingdom or Australian data residency requirements are excluded outright.
- Review analytics, scripting and the third-party application ecosystem remain deeper on Relativity, which matters for firms with established review workflows.
- As a listed company reporting losses, it has been through leadership change including the founder departure in 2023, so multi-year roadmap commitments carry more risk than with a private vendor.
- Complex productions and unusual data types still require professional services, so the promise of self-service holds mainly for mainstream email and document collections.
NetDocuments
- Quote-only pricing per user with no published rates
- Migrating an existing document store is a substantial project, and legacy metadata rarely survives cleanly
- Aimed at mid-size and large firms; solo practices find it heavier than needed
- Adoption depends on fee earners filing correctly, and habits are the hard part
Pricing, plan by plan
DISCO
On request- DISCO Ediscovery$undefined/year
- Quoted per gigabyte of hosted data per month with unlimited users
- Annual commitments and volume tiers negotiated for firms with steady caseloads
- Legal hold, Case Builder and AI features priced as separate modules
NetDocuments
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the NetDocuments review.
Which should you pick?
Choose NetDocuments if
- You need matter-centric filing.
- You work on Web, Windows, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- You also want ethical walls.
Questions people ask
- Is DISCO or NetDocuments better?
- Neither clearly leads. DISCO starts at On request and NetDocuments at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DISCO or NetDocuments?
- DISCO starts at On request and NetDocuments at On request.
- Does DISCO or NetDocuments run on more platforms?
- DISCO runs on Web. NetDocuments runs on Web, Windows, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- What is DISCO best used for?
- DISCO is most often used for a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known, a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge, an in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of two, a case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platform. Of those, a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known and a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge are not what NetDocuments is typically brought in for.
- What can DISCO do that NetDocuments cannot?
- DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Cecilia AI, Technology assisted review, Legal hold. NetDocuments covers Matter-centric filing, Ethical walls, Email management, Version control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DISCO: How is DISCO priced?
Per gigabyte of hosted data per month, all-in, with unlimited users. There is no published rate card, so it is quoted.
NetDocuments: What does NetDocuments cost?
It quotes per user and does not publish rates.
DISCO: Can data be hosted outside the United States?
Coverage is centred on United States cloud regions, so confirm residency before shortlisting for European or Australian matters.
NetDocuments: Why not just use SharePoint or Dropbox?
Neither expresses matter-centric security or ethical walls in an auditable way, which is a professional obligation rather than a preference in legal practice.
DISCO: Is it cheaper than Relativity?
On small and mid-sized matters usually yes, because seats and analytics are included. On very large collections the volume charge often overtakes a negotiated Relativity arrangement.
NetDocuments: Does it handle email?
Yes, capturing correspondence into the matter record, which is where most legal email otherwise fails to land.
Related pages
More on NetDocuments
Other head to heads
- DISCO vs Relativity
- DISCO vs Everlaw
- DISCO vs Logikcull
- DISCO vs Filevine
- DISCO vs Luminance
- DISCO vs CASEpeer
- DISCO vs Cookiebot
- DISCO vs iubenda
- DISCO vs LexisNexis
- DISCO vs Litify
- DISCO vs Ironclad
- DISCO vs Spellbook
- DISCO vs Intapp
- DISCO vs Litera
- DISCO vs Rocket Matter
- DISCO vs Secure Privacy
- DISCO vs Tabs3
- DISCO vs iManage
- DISCO vs Clio
- DISCO vs Aderant
- DISCO vs Docketwise
- DISCO vs MyCase
- DISCO vs Actionstep
- NetDocuments vs Relativity
- NetDocuments vs Everlaw
- NetDocuments vs Logikcull
- NetDocuments vs Filevine
- NetDocuments vs Luminance
- NetDocuments vs CASEpeer
- NetDocuments vs Cookiebot
- NetDocuments vs iubenda
- NetDocuments vs LexisNexis
- NetDocuments vs Litify
- NetDocuments vs Ironclad
- NetDocuments vs Spellbook
- NetDocuments vs Intapp
- NetDocuments vs Litera
- NetDocuments vs Rocket Matter
- NetDocuments vs Secure Privacy
- NetDocuments vs Tabs3
- NetDocuments vs iManage
- NetDocuments vs Clio
- NetDocuments vs Aderant
- NetDocuments vs Docketwise
- NetDocuments vs MyCase
- NetDocuments vs Actionstep

