Automation Integration · head to head
Hatchet vs UiPath

Hatchet
Automation Integration
Postgres-backed distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript and Go
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

UiPath
Automation Integration
The leading platform for business process automation
- From
- $25/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Hatchet has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Hatchet postgres as the queue backend simplifies operations but sets a throughput ceiling, and very high task rates require database tuning or partitioning work that a purpose-built queue would not demand.; UiPath the Basic plan from $25 per month caps the tenant at 5 Basic users, 5 Plus users, 1 Pro user and 2 unattended robots
- They diverge on capability: Hatchet covers Postgres-backed queue, UiPath covers Desktop RPA.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Hatchet and UiPath actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Hatchet
- Postgres-backed queue
- Durable execution
- DAG workflows
- Concurrency and fairness
- Rate limiting
- Cron and scheduling
- Multi-language SDKs
- Self-hosting
Only in UiPath
- Desktop RPA
- Cloud RPA
- Process mining
- Task mining
- AI capabilities
- Monitoring
- Analytics
- 500+ connectors
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Hatchet
- An AI product running long agent pipelines that must survive worker restarts and resume mid-workflownot UiPath
- A team that outgrew Celery and wants concurrency keys, fairness and rate limiting without building themnot UiPath
- An engineering group that wants durable execution self-hosted with no datastore beyond the Postgres they already runnot UiPath
- A multi-tenant SaaS that needs one noisy customer's jobs not to starve everyone else'snot UiPath
UiPath
- Robotic process automation and business automationnot Hatchet
- Enterprise-wide deployment and process optimizationnot Hatchet
- UI automation and intelligent document processingnot Hatchet
- Large-scale automation programs with custom requirementsnot Hatchet
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Hatchet
- Postgres as the queue backend simplifies operations but sets a throughput ceiling, and very high task rates require database tuning or partitioning work that a purpose-built queue would not demand.
- Data retention on the managed tiers is three days on Team and seven on Scale, which is short for debugging intermittent failures and forces you to export run history elsewhere.
- The step from the free tier to Team is 500 US dollars a month plus usage, which is a large increment for a small team that simply needs a production SLA.
- Hatchet is a young company in a category with Temporal, Inngest and cloud-native alternatives already established, so ecosystem, hiring pool and third-party material are all thin.
- Self-hosting the MIT engine is realistic but you then run the engine, its Postgres and its workers yourself, and the managed features such as audit logs and support are not part of that.
UiPath
- The Basic plan from $25 per month caps the tenant at 5 Basic users, 5 Plus users, 1 Pro user and 2 unattended robots
- Basic tenants are hosted only in the European region
- Only the Basic tier carries a published price; Standard and Enterprise require contacting sales
- Self healing automation, process simulation, Elastic Robot Orchestration, bring your own encryption keys and dedicated deployments are Enterprise only
- Agent capability is limited on Basic and requires Standard or Enterprise
- Extra unattended robots are purchased separately on top of the plan
Pricing, plan by plan
Hatchet
Free- DeveloperFree
- First 100,000 task runs included
- $10 per million task runs after
- No card required
- Team$500/month
- Usage billed on top of the base fee
- 10 users and 5 tenants
- 3 day data retention
- Scale$1000/month
- Unlimited users and tenants
- 7 day data retention
- Audit logs
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- 300 million plus runs a month
- Latency guarantees and custom SLAs
- SSO and audit logging
UiPath
$25/month- Automation Cloud Basic$25/month
- Build and run basic personal automations
- Limited scale
- 99.9% service uptime
- Automation Cloud Standard$null/month
- Enterprise automation capabilities
- Document classification and extraction at scale
- No limits to scale
- Automation Cloud Enterprise$null/month
- Self-healing UI automation
- Process optimization and simulation
- Infrastructure automation
- Test Cloud Standard$null/month
- Contact Sales for pricing
Which should you pick?
Choose Hatchet if
- You need postgres-backed queue.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
- You also want durable execution.
Questions people ask
- Is Hatchet or UiPath better?
- Neither clearly leads. Hatchet starts at Free and UiPath at $25/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Hatchet or UiPath?
- Hatchet has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Hatchet and $25/month for UiPath.
- Does Hatchet or UiPath run on more platforms?
- Hatchet runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud. UiPath runs on Desktop, Web.
- Can I use Hatchet for free?
- Yes. Hatchet has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. UiPath starts at $25/month.
- What is Hatchet best used for?
- Hatchet is most often used for an ai product running long agent pipelines that must survive worker restarts and resume mid-workflow, a team that outgrew celery and wants concurrency keys, fairness and rate limiting without building them, an engineering group that wants durable execution self-hosted with no datastore beyond the postgres they already run, a multi-tenant saas that needs one noisy customer's jobs not to starve everyone else's. Of those, an ai product running long agent pipelines that must survive worker restarts and resume mid-workflow and a team that outgrew celery and wants concurrency keys, fairness and rate limiting without building them are not what UiPath is typically brought in for.
- What can Hatchet do that UiPath cannot?
- Hatchet covers Postgres-backed queue, Durable execution, DAG workflows, Concurrency and fairness. UiPath covers Desktop RPA, Cloud RPA, Process mining, Task mining.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Hatchet: Is Hatchet open source?
Yes, the engine is MIT licensed and can be self-hosted, with a managed cloud offered alongside.
UiPath: How much does UiPath cost?
UiPath Automation Cloud Basic starts at $25/month for individuals and small teams. Standard and Enterprise tiers require contacting sales for custom pricing based on organizational needs.
SourceHatchet: What does it cost?
Free for the first 100,000 task runs, then 10 US dollars per million. Team is 500 US dollars a month plus usage; Scale is 1,000.
UiPath: What are the limitations of UiPath's Basic tier?
The Basic tier at $25/month is limited to building and running basic personal automations at limited scale, with European region hosting only and bronze-level support. Standard and Enterprise tiers remove these limits.
SourceHatchet: Why Postgres as the queue?
So durable task state lives in a database your team already backs up, replicates and can inspect with SQL, instead of a second system.
UiPath: Does UiPath charge for users and robots separately?
UiPath's pricing tiers include base costs, but users, robots, and agents may require additional purchases beyond the tier pricing, depending on organizational requirements.
SourceHatchet: How does it compare with Temporal?
Lighter to adopt and operate, with a much smaller ecosystem and a lower throughput ceiling from the Postgres backend.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Hatchet vs Temporal
- Hatchet vs Inngest
- Hatchet vs Dagster
- Hatchet vs Orkes
- Hatchet vs Flowable
- Hatchet vs jBPM
- Hatchet vs Prefect
- Hatchet vs Camunda
- Hatchet vs Autonoly
- Hatchet vs Decodable
- Hatchet vs CrewAI
- Hatchet vs Cyclr
- Hatchet vs Paragon
- Hatchet vs Workato
- Hatchet vs Automation Anywhere
- Hatchet vs Blue Prism
- Hatchet vs Celigo
- Hatchet vs Talend
- Hatchet vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Hatchet vs Nintex
- Hatchet vs Tray.io
- Hatchet vs Boomi
- Hatchet vs n8n
- Hatchet vs Jitterbit
- Hatchet vs Activiti
- Hatchet vs Automate.io
- Hatchet vs Browser Use
- Hatchet vs Browserbase
- UiPath vs Temporal
- UiPath vs Inngest
- UiPath vs Dagster
- UiPath vs Orkes
- UiPath vs Flowable
- UiPath vs jBPM
- UiPath vs Prefect
- UiPath vs Camunda
- UiPath vs Autonoly
- UiPath vs Decodable
- UiPath vs CrewAI
- UiPath vs Cyclr
- UiPath vs Paragon
- UiPath vs Workato
- UiPath vs Automation Anywhere
- UiPath vs Blue Prism
- UiPath vs Celigo
- UiPath vs Talend
- UiPath vs Microsoft Power Automate
- UiPath vs Nintex
- UiPath vs Tray.io
- UiPath vs Boomi
- UiPath vs n8n
- UiPath vs Jitterbit
- UiPath vs Activiti
- UiPath vs Automate.io
- UiPath vs Browser Use
- UiPath vs Browserbase
