Marketing · head to head
Countly vs jBPM

jBPM
Automation Integration
Long-running Java BPMN engine, now developed inside Apache KIE with commercial support from IBM
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Countly the private cloud plan starts at $175 a month and is described as usage based without stating the unit; jBPM the project moved to the Apache Software Foundation as Apache KIE and is still in incubation, which is a weaker governance signal than a vendor-owned product and a harder case to make to an architecture board.
- They diverge on capability: Countly covers Event tracking, jBPM covers BPMN 2.0 execution.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Countly and jBPM actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Countly
- Event tracking
- Crash reporting
- Analytics dashboard
- User retention
- Open-source
- Cloud deployment
- On-premise deployment
- Web support
Only in jBPM
- BPMN 2.0 execution
- Drools integration
- Human task service
- Kogito compilation
- Process designer
- Timers and signals
- REST and Java APIs
- Case management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Countly
- Product analytics for mobile and web applicationsnot jBPM
- Self hosting analytics where data cannot leave the organisationnot jBPM
jBPM
- A Java organisation already running jBPM 7 that needs to decide between the Apache KIE line, Kogito or migration awaynot Countly
- A team that wants BPMN processes and Drools business rules executing in one runtime without integrating two productsnot Countly
- A government or banking system with long-running processes needing durable timers and full audit history at no licence costnot Countly
- A Quarkus estate adopting Kogito to run compiled processes with container-appropriate startup timesnot Countly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Countly
- The private cloud plan starts at $175 a month and is described as usage based without stating the unit
- No event cap, data point limit or user limit is published for either paid plan
- The self hosted Enterprise edition is custom priced and billed annually
- Adaptivity and intelligence features are separately priced add ons on the cheaper plan
jBPM
- The project moved to the Apache Software Foundation as Apache KIE and is still in incubation, which is a weaker governance signal than a vendor-owned product and a harder case to make to an architecture board.
- The classic jBPM 7.x line has not had a Red Hat-sponsored release since 2023, so staying on it means running effectively frozen software while the development happens under a different name.
- Kogito is architecturally different from the classic runtime, using ahead-of-time compilation, so moving forward is a migration project rather than a version upgrade.
- Commercial support has shifted to IBM Business Automation Manager Open Editions, which means renegotiating with a different vendor under different terms than Red Hat customers signed.
- The tooling and workbench have long been the weakest part, and organisations routinely build their own process administration interfaces because the shipped ones are dated.
Pricing, plan by plan
Countly
Free- Flex (Private Cloud)$175/month
- Usage-based pricing (not seat-based)
- Advanced Analytics included
- Adaptivity and Intelligence available as add-ons
- Enterprise (Self-Hosted)$null/mo
- Custom pricing, requires demo booking
- All capabilities included
- Deploy on your infrastructure
jBPM
Free- jBPMFree
- Apache 2.0 licence with no usage restrictions
- Full BPMN engine, human tasks and Drools integration
- Community support via Apache KIE mailing lists
Which should you pick?
Choose Countly if
- You need event tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want crash reporting.
Choose jBPM if
- You need bpmn 2.0 execution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want drools integration.
Questions people ask
- Is Countly or jBPM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Countly starts at Free and jBPM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Countly or jBPM?
- Countly starts at Free and jBPM at Free.
- Does Countly or jBPM run on more platforms?
- Countly runs on Web, Mobile, Api. jBPM runs on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Countly for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Countly best used for?
- Countly is most often used for product analytics for mobile and web applications, self hosting analytics where data cannot leave the organisation. Of those, product analytics for mobile and web applications and self hosting analytics where data cannot leave the organisation are not what jBPM is typically brought in for.
- What can Countly do that jBPM cannot?
- Countly covers Event tracking, Crash reporting, Analytics dashboard, User retention. jBPM covers BPMN 2.0 execution, Drools integration, Human task service, Kogito compilation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Countly: How much does Countly cost?
Countly's Flex plan (private cloud) starts at $175/month with pay-as-you-go cancellation. Enterprise (self-hosted) requires custom pricing and annual billing. Both plans include advanced analytics, and Flex offers a 14-day free trial.
SourcejBPM: Is jBPM dead?
No. Development continues as part of Apache KIE, with releases through 2025, but the Red Hat-sponsored 7.x line has been static since 2023.
Countly: What is the difference between Countly Flex and Enterprise plans?
Flex uses usage-based pricing on Countly's cloud with monthly billing. Enterprise requires custom pricing and annual billing, but allows self-hosting on your infrastructure with zero vendor access to data, dedicated support, and included SLA.
SourcejBPM: Who provides commercial support?
IBM, through Business Automation Manager Open Editions, following the transition away from Red Hat Process Automation Manager as a growth product.
Countly: Can I add Adaptivity and Intelligence to Countly Flex?
Yes, Adaptivity and Intelligence suites can be added to Flex as needed. Both are included standard with Enterprise plans.
SourcejBPM: What is Kogito?
The cloud-native successor that compiles processes ahead of time for Quarkus and Spring Boot, architecturally different from the classic jBPM runtime.
jBPM: Does it cost anything?
No. It is Apache 2.0 licensed with no fee. Costs are support contracts and the engineering effort to run it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Countly vs Crazy Egg
- Countly vs Ruler Analytics
- Countly vs VWO
- Countly vs Northbeam
- Countly vs Umami
- Countly vs Matomo
- Countly vs Mautic
- Countly vs June
- Countly vs CleverTap
- Countly vs Moz
- Countly vs Microsoft Clarity
- Countly vs Netcore Cloud
- Countly vs Whatagraph
- Countly vs MoEngage
- Countly vs Optimizely
- Countly vs Vimeo
- Countly vs Attribution
- Countly vs Fathom Analytics
- Countly vs Temporal
- Countly vs Nintex
- Countly vs Flowable
- Countly vs Activiti
- Countly vs Camunda
- Countly vs Meltano
- Countly vs Airbyte
- Countly vs Windmill
- Countly vs Hatchet
- Countly vs n8n
- Countly vs RudderStack
- Countly vs Nango
- Countly vs Orkes
- Countly vs Polytomic
- Countly vs Relevance AI
- Countly vs Salesforce Flows
- Countly vs SnapLogic
- jBPM vs Crazy Egg
- jBPM vs Ruler Analytics
- jBPM vs VWO
- jBPM vs Northbeam
- jBPM vs Umami
- jBPM vs Matomo
- jBPM vs Mautic
- jBPM vs June
- jBPM vs CleverTap
- jBPM vs Moz
- jBPM vs Microsoft Clarity
- jBPM vs Netcore Cloud
- jBPM vs Whatagraph
- jBPM vs MoEngage
- jBPM vs Optimizely
- jBPM vs Vimeo
- jBPM vs Attribution
- jBPM vs Fathom Analytics
- jBPM vs Temporal
- jBPM vs Nintex
- jBPM vs Flowable
- jBPM vs Activiti
- jBPM vs Camunda
- jBPM vs Meltano
- jBPM vs Airbyte
- jBPM vs Windmill
- jBPM vs Hatchet
- jBPM vs n8n
- jBPM vs RudderStack
- jBPM vs Nango
- jBPM vs Orkes
- jBPM vs Polytomic
- jBPM vs Relevance AI
- jBPM vs Salesforce Flows
- jBPM vs SnapLogic

