Construction · head to head
Contractor Foreman vs Sitemark

Contractor Foreman
Construction
Construction management for contractors covering scheduling, invoicing and crew management
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sitemark
Construction
Drone-based progress tracking, quality control and commissioning built specifically for solar farms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Contractor Foreman has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Contractor Foreman 100-day money-back guarantee only available for annual billing, not monthly; Sitemark it only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Contractor Foreman and Sitemark actually diverge.
| Attribute | Contractor Foreman | Sitemark |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Contractor Foreman
Nothing recorded that Sitemark does not also cover.
Only in Sitemark
- Construction progress tracking
- As-built versus design comparison
- Thermographic inspection
- Defect localisation
- Commissioning workflows
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
- Drone and robotics ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Contractor Foreman
- Construction project management and trackingnot Sitemark
- Field team crew coordinationnot Sitemark
- Project timeline managementnot Sitemark
- Multi-project workload balancing for contractorsnot Sitemark
Sitemark
- An EPC contractor on a multi-hundred-megawatt ground-mount plant that must report weekly installed counts to a lender and cannot do it by walking the rowsnot Contractor Foreman
- An asset owner accepting a plant at provisional acceptance who needs documented evidence that what was built matches the issued design before signingnot Contractor Foreman
- An operations team running annual thermographic inspection across a portfolio, wanting defects mapped to module positions so a technician goes straight to the faultnot Contractor Foreman
- A developer comparing defect and underperformance rates across contractors and module suppliers to inform the next procurement roundnot Contractor Foreman
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Contractor Foreman
- 100-day money-back guarantee only available for annual billing, not monthly
- All plans include 30-day trial, but commitment ends trial with charges
- Stripe payment adds 2.9% + $0.30 per transaction fee; ACH adds 1% + $0.30 max fee
Sitemark
- It only does solar, so a mixed renewables portfolio still needs a second platform for wind, storage and substations, and the consolidation argument for buying it collapses.
- Pricing is quoted on site count and unpublished variables, which penalises owners of many small distributed assets relative to one operator of a single large plant with the same total capacity.
- You still need someone to fly the site, and Sitemark does not remove the drone operator cost, permits or airspace constraints; it monetises the data after the flight.
- Automated progress counting depends on a clean, current design layout, and on projects where the layout changes weekly the comparison generates false deviations that erode trust in the numbers.
- Thermographic defect detection needs the plant producing at sufficient irradiance, so inspection windows in northern latitudes are narrow and a missed window pushes findings into the next season.
Pricing, plan by plan
Contractor Foreman
Free- Basic$49/month
- 1 user
- 30-day free trial
- 100-day money-back guarantee (annual only)
- Standard$105/month
- 3 users
- 30-day free trial
- 100-day money-back guarantee (annual only)
- Plus$166/month
- 8 users
- 30-day free trial
- 100-day money-back guarantee (annual only)
- Pro$221/month
- 15 users
- 30-day free trial
- 100-day money-back guarantee (annual only)
Sitemark
On request- Sitemark Construction$undefined/year
- Priced on number of sites and other variables
- Progress tracking across construction activities
- As-built versus design quality control
- Sitemark Operations$undefined/year
- Thermographic inspection and defect detection
- Ticketing and work management
- Portfolio dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Sitemark if
- You need construction progress tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want as-built versus design comparison.
Questions people ask
- Is Contractor Foreman or Sitemark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Contractor Foreman starts at Free and Sitemark at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Contractor Foreman or Sitemark?
- Contractor Foreman has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Contractor Foreman and On request for Sitemark.
- Does Contractor Foreman or Sitemark run on more platforms?
- Contractor Foreman runs on Web. Sitemark runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Contractor Foreman for free?
- Yes. Contractor Foreman has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Sitemark starts at On request.
- What is Contractor Foreman best used for?
- Contractor Foreman is most often used for construction project management and tracking, field team crew coordination, project timeline management, multi-project workload balancing for contractors. Of those, construction project management and tracking and field team crew coordination are not what Sitemark is typically brought in for.
- What can Contractor Foreman do that Sitemark cannot?
- Sitemark covers Construction progress tracking, As-built versus design comparison, Thermographic inspection, Defect localisation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Contractor Foreman: How much does Contractor Foreman cost?
Contractor Foreman pricing ranges from $49/month for 1 user (Basic) to $332/month for unlimited users (Unlimited). Annual payment provides 100-day money-back guarantee.
SourceSitemark: Is Sitemark priced per megawatt?
No. Sitemark states pricing is based on number of sites and other variables. Ask explicitly how a portfolio of small sites is treated, because per-site pricing is unkind to distributed assets.
Contractor Foreman: How many users are included in each Contractor Foreman plan?
Basic includes 1 user, Standard includes 3 users, Plus includes 8 users, Pro includes 15 users, and Unlimited plan includes unlimited users.
SourceSitemark: Do we have to use Sitemark drone pilots?
No. It accepts data from third-party drone operators, which lets you keep an existing flight contractor.
Contractor Foreman: Does Contractor Foreman offer a free trial?
Yes, all Contractor Foreman plans include a 30-day free trial with no charge until the trial ends. Annual plans also include a 100-day money-back guarantee.
SourceSitemark: Does it cover anything other than solar?
No. It is built specifically around solar plant structures and defect types.
Contractor Foreman: What payment methods does Contractor Foreman accept?
Contractor Foreman accepts Stripe payments (2.9% + $0.30 per transaction) and ACH bank transfers (1% + $0.30 max fee).
SourceSitemark: Can we export our data?
Yes, orthomosaics, defect lists and reports export. Confirm the format and whether historical inspections remain accessible after a subscription lapses.
Sitemark: Where is the company based?
Leuven, Belgium, with customers across Europe, the Middle East, Asia and the Americas.
Related pages
More on Contractor Foreman
Other head to heads
- Contractor Foreman vs Procore
- Contractor Foreman vs SketchUp
- Contractor Foreman vs ArchiCAD
- Contractor Foreman vs Autodesk Revit
- Contractor Foreman vs JobTread
- Contractor Foreman vs HCSS
- Contractor Foreman vs Knowify
- Contractor Foreman vs Reconstruct
- Contractor Foreman vs ALICE Technologies
- Contractor Foreman vs Assignar
- Contractor Foreman vs Buildxact
- Contractor Foreman vs Microsoft Project
- Contractor Foreman vs Houzz Pro
- Contractor Foreman vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Contractor Foreman vs Jonas Premier
- Contractor Foreman vs Kahua
- Contractor Foreman vs Kojo
- Contractor Foreman vs Dalux
- Contractor Foreman vs Buildots
- Contractor Foreman vs Propeller Aero
- Contractor Foreman vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Contractor Foreman vs B2W Estimate
- Contractor Foreman vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Contractor Foreman vs Primavera P6
- Contractor Foreman vs Smartsheet
- Contractor Foreman vs Vectorworks Architect
- Contractor Foreman vs Buildertrend
- Contractor Foreman vs Adaptive
- Contractor Foreman vs Document Crunch
- Contractor Foreman vs GCPay
- Contractor Foreman vs HammerTech
- Contractor Foreman vs Handoff
- Sitemark vs Procore
- Sitemark vs SketchUp
- Sitemark vs ArchiCAD
- Sitemark vs Autodesk Revit
- Sitemark vs JobTread
- Sitemark vs HCSS
- Sitemark vs Knowify
- Sitemark vs Reconstruct
- Sitemark vs ALICE Technologies
- Sitemark vs Assignar
- Sitemark vs Buildxact
- Sitemark vs Microsoft Project
- Sitemark vs Houzz Pro
- Sitemark vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Sitemark vs Jonas Premier
- Sitemark vs Kahua
- Sitemark vs Kojo
- Sitemark vs Dalux
- Sitemark vs Buildots
- Sitemark vs Propeller Aero
- Sitemark vs Skydio Dock for X10
- Sitemark vs B2W Estimate
- Sitemark vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Sitemark vs Primavera P6
- Sitemark vs Smartsheet
- Sitemark vs Vectorworks Architect
- Sitemark vs Buildertrend
- Sitemark vs Adaptive
- Sitemark vs Document Crunch
- Sitemark vs GCPay
- Sitemark vs HammerTech
- Sitemark vs Handoff
