APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch
APIs
Open-source API development ecosystem with web-based REST client
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Hoppscotch open-source project with no published commercial support plans or pricing
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Hoppscotch covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Hoppscotch actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Hoppscotch |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Web, Desktop, Self-hosted |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Hoppscotch
- REST Client
- WebSocket
- gRPC Client
- GitHub
- Documentation tools
- CI/CD
- Desktop support
- Self-hosted support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Hoppscotch
- Schema federationnot Hoppscotch
- API analytics and monitoringnot Hoppscotch
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Hoppscotch
Hoppscotch
- API Developmentnot GraphQL Apollo
- API Gatewaynot GraphQL Apollo
- API Testingnot GraphQL Apollo
- API Documentationnot GraphQL Apollo
- Microservicesnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Hoppscotch
- Open-source project with no published commercial support plans or pricing
- No official enterprise tier or SLA information disclosed
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Hoppscotch
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full REST client
- WebSocket support
- Community
- Teams$8/monthly
- Team collaboration
- Cloud sync
- Priority support
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Hoppscotch if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Self-hosted.
- You also want websocket.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Hoppscotch better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Hoppscotch at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Hoppscotch?
- GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Hoppscotch at Free.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Hoppscotch run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Hoppscotch runs on Web, Desktop, Self-hosted.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Hoppscotch is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Hoppscotch cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Hoppscotch covers REST Client, WebSocket, gRPC Client, GitHub. Both handle Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceHoppscotch: Is Hoppscotch free to use for API development?
Yes, Hoppscotch is a completely free, open-source API development ecosystem. There are no subscription fees, license costs, or registration requirements to access the core platform.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceHoppscotch: Can I deploy Hoppscotch on my own infrastructure?
As an open-source project, Hoppscotch can be self-hosted and deployed on your own infrastructure. The source code is available for customization and deployment in private environments.
SourceGraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceRelated pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Bruno
- GraphQL Apollo vs REST Client VSCode
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong
- GraphQL Apollo vs Tyk
- GraphQL Apollo vs curl
- GraphQL Apollo vs Aiia
- GraphQL Apollo vs Akana
- GraphQL Apollo vs Akoya
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apidog
- GraphQL Apollo vs Astra
- GraphQL Apollo vs Asyncapi
- Hoppscotch vs Hasura
- Hoppscotch vs Appwrite
- Hoppscotch vs PocketBase
- Hoppscotch vs Sanity
- Hoppscotch vs Strapi
- Hoppscotch vs GraphQL Playground
- Hoppscotch vs Kong Gateway
- Hoppscotch vs Parse Server
- Hoppscotch vs WSO2 API Manager
- Hoppscotch vs Janus Gateway
- Hoppscotch vs Directus
- Hoppscotch vs KeystoneJS
- Hoppscotch vs Solaris
- Hoppscotch vs Stainless
- Hoppscotch vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Hoppscotch vs Thredd
- Hoppscotch vs Thunder Client
- Hoppscotch vs Bruno
- Hoppscotch vs REST Client VSCode
- Hoppscotch vs Kong
- Hoppscotch vs Tyk
- Hoppscotch vs curl
- Hoppscotch vs Aiia
- Hoppscotch vs Akana
- Hoppscotch vs Akoya
- Hoppscotch vs Apidog
- Hoppscotch vs Astra
- Hoppscotch vs Asyncapi

