APIs · head to head
GraphQL Apollo vs Rutter

Rutter
APIs
One API across accounting, commerce, payments and advertising platforms
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GraphQL Apollo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing; Rutter a unified schema exposes only the fields common across platforms, so the platform-specific detail underwriting models want usually requires passthrough calls and per-platform code, which is the work the unified API was bought to avoid.
- They diverge on capability: GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Rutter covers Accounting and ERP.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GraphQL Apollo and Rutter actually diverge.
| Attribute | GraphQL Apollo | Rutter |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile | Web, API |
| Founded | 2016 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
Only in Rutter
- Accounting and ERP
- Commerce data
- Payments data
- Advertising data
- Write operations
- Passthrough requests
- Observability tooling
- Sandbox
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot Rutter
- Schema federationnot Rutter
- API analytics and monitoringnot Rutter
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot Rutter
Rutter
- A revenue-based lender that must pull a merchant's sales, payouts and general ledger before pricing a facilitynot GraphQL Apollo
- A spend management product that needs to push bills and journal entries back into whichever accounting system its customer runsnot GraphQL Apollo
- A B2B payments platform reconciling invoices across customers using four different ERPsnot GraphQL Apollo
- An insurance or benefits provider that needs verified business financials without asking the customer to upload PDFsnot GraphQL Apollo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Rutter
- A unified schema exposes only the fields common across platforms, so the platform-specific detail underwriting models want usually requires passthrough calls and per-platform code, which is the work the unified API was bought to avoid.
- Write operations into accounting systems are where these products break, because each system validates differently, and a rejected journal entry surfaces as a support ticket against you rather than against the ERP.
- No pricing is published beyond a sandbox trial, so cost cannot be compared against alternatives without a sales process, and pricing tends to scale with connected accounts.
- QuickBooks Desktop and other on-premises systems require a local connector or hosted agent, which introduces installation steps your customers must complete and support burden you inherit.
- Sync freshness varies by platform and by customer authorisation state, so a product promising near real-time figures will find some connections update far less often than the marketing implies.
Pricing, plan by plan
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Rutter
On request- Starter$undefined/month
- Thirty day sandbox trial
- Test integrations with QuickBooks, Xero, FreshBooks and Zoho Books
- Documentation and workflow guides
- Full Access$undefined/year
- Production access across all platforms
- Includes NetSuite, QuickBooks Desktop and Sage Intacct
- Write operations and passthrough
Which should you pick?
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Choose Rutter if
- You need accounting and erp.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want commerce data.
Questions people ask
- Is GraphQL Apollo or Rutter better?
- Neither clearly leads. GraphQL Apollo starts at Free and Rutter at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GraphQL Apollo or Rutter?
- GraphQL Apollo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GraphQL Apollo and On request for Rutter.
- Does GraphQL Apollo or Rutter run on more platforms?
- GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile. Rutter runs on Web, API.
- Can I use GraphQL Apollo for free?
- Yes. GraphQL Apollo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Rutter starts at On request.
- What is GraphQL Apollo best used for?
- GraphQL Apollo is most often used for graphql api management, schema federation, api analytics and monitoring, developer-focused infrastructure. Of those, graphql api management and schema federation are not what Rutter is typically brought in for.
- What can GraphQL Apollo do that Rutter cannot?
- GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs. Rutter covers Accounting and ERP, Commerce data, Payments data, Advertising data.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceRutter: Does Rutter support QuickBooks Desktop?
Yes, which distinguishes it from unified APIs that only cover cloud accounting, and matters because many small businesses still run it.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceRutter: Can Rutter write data back?
Yes. Invoices, bills and journal entries can be pushed into supported accounting systems, not only read.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceRutter: Is there a free tier?
There is a thirty day sandbox trial with test data. Production access requires a paid plan with quoted pricing.
Rutter: What if the unified model lacks a field I need?
Rutter supports passthrough requests to the underlying platform API, though using them reintroduces platform-specific code.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Codat
- GraphQL Apollo vs Yodlee
- GraphQL Apollo vs Increase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Mambu
- GraphQL Apollo vs Unit
- GraphQL Apollo vs Astra
- GraphQL Apollo vs TrueLayer
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swan
- GraphQL Apollo vs Token.io
- GraphQL Apollo vs Yapily
- GraphQL Apollo vs Skaleet
- GraphQL Apollo vs Vodeno
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backendless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Convoy
- GraphQL Apollo vs Dwolla
- GraphQL Apollo vs Enable Banking
- GraphQL Apollo vs Flybits
- Rutter vs Hasura
- Rutter vs Appwrite
- Rutter vs PocketBase
- Rutter vs Sanity
- Rutter vs Strapi
- Rutter vs GraphQL Playground
- Rutter vs Kong Gateway
- Rutter vs Parse Server
- Rutter vs WSO2 API Manager
- Rutter vs Janus Gateway
- Rutter vs Directus
- Rutter vs KeystoneJS
- Rutter vs Solaris
- Rutter vs Stainless
- Rutter vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Rutter vs Thredd
- Rutter vs Thunder Client
- Rutter vs Codat
- Rutter vs Yodlee
- Rutter vs Increase
- Rutter vs Mambu
- Rutter vs Unit
- Rutter vs Astra
- Rutter vs TrueLayer
- Rutter vs Swan
- Rutter vs Token.io
- Rutter vs Yapily
- Rutter vs Skaleet
- Rutter vs Vodeno
- Rutter vs Backendless
- Rutter vs Convoy
- Rutter vs Dwolla
- Rutter vs Enable Banking
- Rutter vs Flybits

