Backup · head to head
Bacula vs CloudCasa

CloudCasa
Backup
SaaS Kubernetes backup and migration with published per-node pricing
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bacula the community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.; CloudCasa at $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bacula and CloudCasa actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bacula
Nothing recorded that CloudCasa does not also cover.
Only in CloudCasa
- SaaS control plane
- Free tier
- Cross-cluster restore
- Managed service support
- Bring your own storage
- Velero compatibility
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bacula
- Linux, Windows, and macOS network backup at scalenot CloudCasa
- VMware, KVM, Hyper-V virtual machine backupnot CloudCasa
- MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL database backupnot CloudCasa
- Microsoft Exchange Server backupnot CloudCasa
- Tape backup and enterprise data retentionnot CloudCasa
CloudCasa
- A team wanting Kubernetes backup running this afternoon without deploying and maintaining a backup servernot Bacula
- A small cluster of five nodes or fewer that needs real backup at no licence costnot Bacula
- An organisation running Velero already and wanting a managed control plane and catalogue over the topnot Bacula
- Migrating workloads between EKS and AKS where the tool must restore into a different distributionnot Bacula
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bacula
- The community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.
CloudCasa
- At $69 per node per month, a fifty-node estate costs over forty thousand dollars a year at list, which is more than many teams expect from a product marketed on its free tier.
- The control plane is SaaS, so cluster metadata and backup catalogues sit with the vendor, which rules it out where policy prohibits external services holding infrastructure detail.
- Per-node pricing punishes clusters built from many small nodes, so the licensing metric can push architecture decisions in directions the platform team would not otherwise choose.
- The free tier stops at five nodes with no intermediate step, so growth from five to six nodes moves you from nothing to a full commercial rate.
- Catalogic is a much smaller vendor than Veeam or Commvault, which matters for procurement risk assessments and for long-term support commitments on a system you may depend on for years.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bacula
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Bacula review.
CloudCasa
Free- BasicFree
- Up to 5 nodes at no cost
- Daily backup schedules for clusters and namespaces
- Basic and advanced restore options
- CloudCasa Pro$69/month
- Per node per month
- Advanced backup policies
- Application-aware backups
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Volume pricing negotiated
- Dedicated support and SLAs
- Custom retention and residency arrangements
Which should you pick?
Choose CloudCasa if
- You need saas control plane.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Kubernetes, Web.
- You also want free tier.
Questions people ask
- Is Bacula or CloudCasa better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bacula starts at Free and CloudCasa at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bacula or CloudCasa?
- Bacula starts at Free and CloudCasa at Free.
- Does Bacula or CloudCasa run on more platforms?
- Bacula runs on Web. CloudCasa runs on Kubernetes, Web.
- Can I use Bacula for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bacula best used for?
- Bacula is most often used for linux, windows, and macos network backup at scale, vmware, kvm, hyper-v virtual machine backup, mysql, oracle, postgresql database backup, microsoft exchange server backup. Of those, linux, windows, and macos network backup at scale and vmware, kvm, hyper-v virtual machine backup are not what CloudCasa is typically brought in for.
- What can Bacula do that CloudCasa cannot?
- CloudCasa covers SaaS control plane, Free tier, Cross-cluster restore, Managed service support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bacula: How much does Bacula cost?
Bacula Community Edition is free and open source. Bacula Enterprise is a commercial offering with a free trial available, but specific pricing is not listed on the main website.
SourceCloudCasa: What does it cost?
Free for up to five nodes. CloudCasa Pro is $69 per node per month. Enterprise arrangements are negotiated.
Bacula: Is Bacula free?
Bacula Community Edition is fully free and open source. Enterprise Edition is commercial but offers a free trial to evaluate features before purchasing.
SourceCloudCasa: Where does the backup data go?
Typically to your own S3-compatible bucket. The vendor hosts the control plane and catalogue, not necessarily your data.
CloudCasa: Does it work with Velero?
Yes. It can manage existing Velero installations, which makes it a lower-friction upgrade than a rip and replace.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bacula vs UrBackup
- Bacula vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Bacula vs Backupify
- Bacula vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Bacula vs Spanning Backup
- Bacula vs CloudAlly
- Bacula vs Velero
- Bacula vs Kopia
- Bacula vs Amanda Enterprise
- Bacula vs Clonezilla
- Bacula vs Restic
- Bacula vs Portworx Backup
- Bacula vs Redstor
- Bacula vs rustic
- Bacula vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Bacula vs SysCloud
- Bacula vs Trilio
- Bacula vs Unitrends Backup
- Bacula vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Bacula vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Bacula vs HYCU
- Bacula vs BDRShield
- Bacula vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Bacula vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Bacula vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Bacula vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Bacula vs IBM Storage Protect
- Bacula vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Bacula vs Macrium Reflect
- CloudCasa vs UrBackup
- CloudCasa vs Proxmox Backup Server
- CloudCasa vs Backupify
- CloudCasa vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- CloudCasa vs Spanning Backup
- CloudCasa vs CloudAlly
- CloudCasa vs Velero
- CloudCasa vs Kopia
- CloudCasa vs Amanda Enterprise
- CloudCasa vs Clonezilla
- CloudCasa vs Restic
- CloudCasa vs Portworx Backup
- CloudCasa vs Redstor
- CloudCasa vs rustic
- CloudCasa vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- CloudCasa vs SysCloud
- CloudCasa vs Trilio
- CloudCasa vs Unitrends Backup
- CloudCasa vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- CloudCasa vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- CloudCasa vs HYCU
- CloudCasa vs BDRShield
- CloudCasa vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- CloudCasa vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- CloudCasa vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- CloudCasa vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- CloudCasa vs IBM Storage Protect
- CloudCasa vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- CloudCasa vs Macrium Reflect

