Softwr

Software · head to head

Bacula vs Restic

B

Bacula

Software

The best open source backup software for Linux

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Restic logo

Restic

Software

Fast, secure, and efficient backup program

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bacula the community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.; Restic cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bacula and Restic actually diverge.

Attributes where Bacula and Restic differ
AttributeBaculaRestic
Pricing modelopen-sourcefree
PlatformsWebWindows, Mac, Linux
FoundedUnknown2014

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bacula

Nothing recorded that Restic does not also cover.

Only in Restic

  • Content-defined chunking
  • Cryptographic verification
  • Deduplication
  • Encryption
  • Multiple backends
  • Snapshot management
  • AWS S3
  • Azure

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bacula

No use cases recorded yet. See the Bacula review.

Restic

  • Encrypted deduplicated backups to S3, B2, SFTP and local disk from the command linenot Bacula
  • Scripted server backups with snapshot retention policiesnot Bacula

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bacula

  • The community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.

Restic

  • Cold storage is not natively supported; restoring from S3 Glacier and S3 Glacier Deep Archive is only available as an experimental feature behind a feature flag
  • A Windows file whose name contains a character Windows treats as invalid cannot be read by restic and has to be renamed
  • Antivirus real-time protection degrades performance on Windows unless the restic binary is added to an exclusions list
  • On large repositories the built-in five minute stuck-request timeout fires during file listing and has to be raised manually with --stuck-request-timeout

Pricing, plan by plan

Bacula

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Bacula review.

Restic

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Content-defined chunking
    • Encryption
    • Multiple backends

Which should you pick?

Choose Bacula if

  • You want to start without paying.
Bacula review

Choose Restic if

  • You need content-defined chunking.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, Mac, Linux.
  • You also want cryptographic verification.
Restic review

Questions people ask

Is Bacula or Restic better?
Neither clearly leads. Bacula starts at Free and Restic at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bacula or Restic?
Bacula starts at Free and Restic at Free.
Does Bacula or Restic run on more platforms?
Bacula runs on Web. Restic runs on Windows, Mac, Linux.
Can I use Bacula for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What can Bacula do that Restic cannot?
Restic covers Content-defined chunking, Cryptographic verification, Deduplication, Encryption.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Bacula

More on Restic

Keep looking

Other head to heads