Backup · head to head
Bacula vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect

StorageCraft ShadowProtect
Backup
Fast and reliable image-based backup
- From
- $15/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Bacula has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bacula the community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.; StorageCraft ShadowProtect host-based backup requires Windows Server 2016 or above on the Hyper-V host, and desktop, client and Pro editions are not supported
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bacula and StorageCraft ShadowProtect actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bacula | StorageCraft ShadowProtect |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $15/month |
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, Linux, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2003 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bacula
Nothing recorded that StorageCraft ShadowProtect does not also cover.
Only in StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Image-based backup
- VirtualBoot
- Bare metal recovery
- Hardware-independent restore
- Incremental imaging
- ShadowStream replication
- VMware
- Hyper-V
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bacula
- Linux, Windows, and macOS network backup at scalenot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- VMware, KVM, Hyper-V virtual machine backupnot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL database backupnot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Microsoft Exchange Server backupnot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Tape backup and enterprise data retentionnot StorageCraft ShadowProtect
StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Backup and disaster recovery (legacy)not Bacula
- System image backup and recoverynot Bacula
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bacula
- The community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.
StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Host-based backup requires Windows Server 2016 or above on the Hyper-V host, and desktop, client and Pro editions are not supported
- Host-based and agent-based backup are mutually exclusive installation modes in ShadowProtect 8.0; one machine cannot run both
- Switching from agent-based to host-based requires a clean reinstall rather than an in-place upgrade
- Host-based backups are not compatible with VirtualBoot
- Granular file and folder recovery is not available for host-based backups; the whole backup must be restored to a .vhd or .vhdx first
- Host-based backup jobs do not report status to ShadowControl
- Advanced Verification in ImageManager 8.1 is not supported for host-based backups
- All host-based backups go into a single folder by default, so separating them per VM means creating a separate backup job for each
- Host-based licence keys are generated only through the Arcserve MSP portal
Pricing, plan by plan
Bacula
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Bacula review.
StorageCraft ShadowProtect
$15/month- ShadowProtect SPX$15/month
- Image-based backup
- VirtualBoot
- Bare metal recovery
Which should you pick?
Choose StorageCraft ShadowProtect if
- You need image-based backup.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want virtualboot.
Questions people ask
- Is Bacula or StorageCraft ShadowProtect better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bacula starts at Free and StorageCraft ShadowProtect at $15/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bacula or StorageCraft ShadowProtect?
- Bacula has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Bacula and $15/month for StorageCraft ShadowProtect.
- Does Bacula or StorageCraft ShadowProtect run on more platforms?
- Bacula runs on Web. StorageCraft ShadowProtect runs on Windows, Linux, Web.
- Can I use Bacula for free?
- Yes. Bacula has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. StorageCraft ShadowProtect starts at $15/month.
- What is Bacula best used for?
- Bacula is most often used for linux, windows, and macos network backup at scale, vmware, kvm, hyper-v virtual machine backup, mysql, oracle, postgresql database backup, microsoft exchange server backup. Of those, linux, windows, and macos network backup at scale and vmware, kvm, hyper-v virtual machine backup are not what StorageCraft ShadowProtect is typically brought in for.
- What can Bacula do that StorageCraft ShadowProtect cannot?
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect covers Image-based backup, VirtualBoot, Bare metal recovery, Hardware-independent restore.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bacula: How much does Bacula cost?
Bacula Community Edition is free and open source. Bacula Enterprise is a commercial offering with a free trial available, but specific pricing is not listed on the main website.
SourceStorageCraft ShadowProtect: How much does StorageCraft ShadowProtect cost?
StorageCraft no longer maintains independent product pricing. The domain redirects to ArcServe, and ArcServe does not publish specific pricing on its homepage. Prospective customers must request a trial, demo, or contact sales.
SourceBacula: Is Bacula free?
Bacula Community Edition is fully free and open source. Enterprise Edition is commercial but offers a free trial to evaluate features before purchasing.
SourceStorageCraft ShadowProtect: Where can I find StorageCraft pricing?
StorageCraft's website (storagecraft.com) now redirects to ArcServe.com. ArcServe does not publish pricing publicly. To obtain pricing information, users can start a trial, request a demo, or contact ArcServe's sales team.
SourceRelated pages
More on StorageCraft ShadowProtect
Other head to heads
- Bacula vs UrBackup
- Bacula vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Bacula vs Backupify
- Bacula vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Bacula vs Spanning Backup
- Bacula vs CloudAlly
- Bacula vs Velero
- Bacula vs Kopia
- Bacula vs Amanda Enterprise
- Bacula vs Clonezilla
- Bacula vs Restic
- Bacula vs Portworx Backup
- Bacula vs Redstor
- Bacula vs rustic
- Bacula vs SysCloud
- Bacula vs Trilio
- Bacula vs Unitrends Backup
- Bacula vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- Bacula vs Macrium Reflect
- Bacula vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Bacula vs HPE StoreOnce
- Bacula vs MSP360 Backup
- Bacula vs Axcient x360Recover
- Bacula vs IBM Storage Protect
- Bacula vs Rewind
- Bacula vs CloudCasa
- Bacula vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Bacula vs Datto Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs UrBackup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Proxmox Backup Server
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Backupify
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Spanning Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs CloudAlly
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Velero
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Kopia
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Amanda Enterprise
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Clonezilla
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Restic
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Portworx Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Redstor
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs rustic
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs SysCloud
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Trilio
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Unitrends Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Macrium Reflect
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs HPE StoreOnce
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs MSP360 Backup
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Axcient x360Recover
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs IBM Storage Protect
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Rewind
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs CloudCasa
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Cohesity DataProtect
- StorageCraft ShadowProtect vs Datto Backup

