Backup · head to head
Bacula vs Portworx Backup

Portworx Backup
Backup
Kubernetes application backup with a free tier up to one terabyte
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bacula the community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.; Portworx Backup the paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bacula and Portworx Backup actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bacula | Portworx Backup |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Per node hour |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bacula
Nothing recorded that Portworx Backup does not also cover.
Only in Portworx Backup
- Application-level backup
- Any CSI provider
- Cross-cluster restore
- Namespace and label selection
- Scheduled policies
- Role-based access
- Free tier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bacula
- Linux, Windows, and macOS network backup at scalenot Portworx Backup
- VMware, KVM, Hyper-V virtual machine backupnot Portworx Backup
- MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL database backupnot Portworx Backup
- Microsoft Exchange Server backupnot Portworx Backup
- Tape backup and enterprise data retentionnot Portworx Backup
Portworx Backup
- A platform team running Velero that needs an accountable vendor for restore failuresnot Bacula
- Protecting Kubernetes applications across EKS, GKE and on premises clusters under one policy setnot Bacula
- Restoring a namespace into a different cloud provider as a disaster recovery testnot Bacula
- A small team that wants real Kubernetes backup within the free one terabyte tier before committing budgetnot Bacula
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bacula
- The community edition has no vendor support contract; bacula.org directs support and paid deployments toward the separate commercial Bacula Enterprise product instead.
Portworx Backup
- The paid tier carries a 1,000 node hour monthly minimum, so a cluster that only needs occasional protection still pays a floor.
- It is licensed separately from Portworx Enterprise, so organisations that assumed storage and backup came together find a second subscription in the quote.
- The free tier caps at one terabyte of protected data, which is quickly exceeded by any database of consequence and forces a jump straight to the minimum commitment.
- Backup targets are object stores you provide, so restore egress charges from your cloud provider are outside the vendor price and appear during a recovery rather than in procurement.
- Application-consistent backup of databases still depends on correct pre and post hooks, so the product does not remove the requirement to understand and rehearse your own restore ordering.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bacula
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Bacula review.
Portworx Backup
Free- FreeFree
- Up to one terabyte of protected data
- No feature restrictions
- Fully managed service
- Portworx Backup$0.2/node hour
- Minimum 1,000 node hours per month
- Unlimited protected capacity
- Any Container Storage Interface provider
Which should you pick?
Choose Portworx Backup if
- You need application-level backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want any csi provider.
Questions people ask
- Is Bacula or Portworx Backup better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bacula starts at Free and Portworx Backup at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bacula or Portworx Backup?
- Bacula starts at Free and Portworx Backup at Free.
- Does Bacula or Portworx Backup run on more platforms?
- Bacula runs on Web. Portworx Backup runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Bacula for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bacula best used for?
- Bacula is most often used for linux, windows, and macos network backup at scale, vmware, kvm, hyper-v virtual machine backup, mysql, oracle, postgresql database backup, microsoft exchange server backup. Of those, linux, windows, and macos network backup at scale and vmware, kvm, hyper-v virtual machine backup are not what Portworx Backup is typically brought in for.
- What can Bacula do that Portworx Backup cannot?
- Portworx Backup covers Application-level backup, Any CSI provider, Cross-cluster restore, Namespace and label selection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bacula: How much does Bacula cost?
Bacula Community Edition is free and open source. Bacula Enterprise is a commercial offering with a free trial available, but specific pricing is not listed on the main website.
SourcePortworx Backup: Is the free tier real?
Yes, up to one terabyte of protected data with no feature restrictions as a managed service. It is a usable production tier for small footprints, not a trial.
Bacula: Is Bacula free?
Bacula Community Edition is fully free and open source. Enterprise Edition is commercial but offers a free trial to evaluate features before purchasing.
SourcePortworx Backup: Does it only protect Portworx volumes?
No. It works across Container Storage Interface providers, including cloud provider storage and other vendors' drivers.
Portworx Backup: Is it included with Portworx Enterprise?
No. It is a separate licence at 0.20 USD per node hour with its own minimum.
Related pages
More on Portworx Backup
Other head to heads
- Bacula vs UrBackup
- Bacula vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Bacula vs Backupify
- Bacula vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Bacula vs Spanning Backup
- Bacula vs CloudAlly
- Bacula vs Velero
- Bacula vs Kopia
- Bacula vs Amanda Enterprise
- Bacula vs Clonezilla
- Bacula vs Restic
- Bacula vs Redstor
- Bacula vs rustic
- Bacula vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Bacula vs SysCloud
- Bacula vs Trilio
- Bacula vs Unitrends Backup
- Bacula vs HYCU
- Bacula vs BDRShield
- Bacula vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Bacula vs CloudCasa
- Bacula vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Bacula vs Datto Backup
- Bacula vs HPE StoreOnce
- Bacula vs MSP360 Backup
- Bacula vs N-able Backup
- Bacula vs OwnBackup
- Portworx Backup vs UrBackup
- Portworx Backup vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Portworx Backup vs Backupify
- Portworx Backup vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Portworx Backup vs Spanning Backup
- Portworx Backup vs CloudAlly
- Portworx Backup vs Velero
- Portworx Backup vs Kopia
- Portworx Backup vs Amanda Enterprise
- Portworx Backup vs Clonezilla
- Portworx Backup vs Restic
- Portworx Backup vs Redstor
- Portworx Backup vs rustic
- Portworx Backup vs StorageCraft ShadowProtect
- Portworx Backup vs SysCloud
- Portworx Backup vs Trilio
- Portworx Backup vs Unitrends Backup
- Portworx Backup vs HYCU
- Portworx Backup vs BDRShield
- Portworx Backup vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Portworx Backup vs CloudCasa
- Portworx Backup vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Portworx Backup vs Datto Backup
- Portworx Backup vs HPE StoreOnce
- Portworx Backup vs MSP360 Backup
- Portworx Backup vs N-able Backup
- Portworx Backup vs OwnBackup

