Fleet Management · head to head
Chevin FleetWave vs Mapillary

Chevin FleetWave
Fleet Management
Fleet management system covering vehicles and equipment assets, sold in three tiers from FleetWave Lite at £3 per vehicle per month upward
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Mapillary
Maps
Platform for street-level imagery that crowdsources images to map the world and
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chevin FleetWave only the Lite tier has a published price; any fleet with real operational complexity ends up in the unpublished Core or Advanced tier regardless of the appealing £3 headline figure.; Mapillary no pricing information published on main website pages, suggesting either free service or hidden pricing model
- They diverge on capability: Chevin FleetWave covers Maintenance scheduling, Mapillary covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chevin FleetWave and Mapillary actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chevin FleetWave | Mapillary |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per vehicle per month (Lite); quote for Core and Advanced | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Category | Fleet Management | Maps |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chevin FleetWave
- Maintenance scheduling
- Compliance tracking
- Fuel management
- Total cost of ownership reporting
- Multi-asset tracking
- Accident and incident recording
Only in Mapillary
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chevin FleetWave
- A smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance trackingnot Mapillary
- A mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate toolsnot Mapillary
- An operation needing total cost of ownership reporting broken down by vehicle and asset typenot Mapillary
- A fleet outgrowing FleetWave Lite and needing Core or Advanced tier compliance and reporting depthnot Mapillary
Mapillary
- Street-level imagery for map editing and verificationnot Chevin FleetWave
- Crowdsourcing photos to keep a map currentnot Chevin FleetWave
- Extracting map features automatically with computer visionnot Chevin FleetWave
- Embedding street imagery with MapillaryJSnot Chevin FleetWave
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chevin FleetWave
- Only the Lite tier has a published price; any fleet with real operational complexity ends up in the unpublished Core or Advanced tier regardless of the appealing £3 headline figure.
- Pricing is in GBP by default, reflecting Chevin UK base, which adds currency conversion uncertainty for buyers budgeting in other currencies before a formal quote.
- The Lite tier is explicitly a simpler feature set, so a fleet that starts there and later needs compliance depth or multi-asset TCO reporting faces a tier upgrade and a new, unpublished price negotiation.
- As a UK-headquartered vendor, integration depth with US-centric telematics and fuel card providers may be less mature than with UK and European partners.
- Equipment and asset pricing at $0.50 per asset is a separate line item from the vehicle rate, so a mixed vehicle-and-equipment fleet needs to calculate two different per-unit costs to budget accurately.
Mapillary
- No pricing information published on main website pages, suggesting either free service or hidden pricing model
- Unclear monetization strategy makes it difficult for businesses to understand licensing costs for commercial use
- No published tier structure or feature limits visible to potential customers
Pricing, plan by plan
Chevin FleetWave
On request- FleetWave Lite$undefined/month
- £3 per vehicle per month
- Equipment and associated assets $0.50 per asset
- Simpler feature set aimed at smaller or less complex fleets
- FleetWave Core / Advanced$undefined/year
- No published pricing, consultation required
- Expanded compliance, TCO and multi-asset reporting features
Mapillary
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Mapillary review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Chevin FleetWave if
- You need maintenance scheduling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want compliance tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Chevin FleetWave or Mapillary better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chevin FleetWave starts at On request and Mapillary at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chevin FleetWave or Mapillary?
- Chevin FleetWave starts at On request and Mapillary at On request.
- Does Chevin FleetWave or Mapillary run on more platforms?
- Chevin FleetWave runs on Web, iOS, Android. Mapillary runs on Web.
- What is Chevin FleetWave best used for?
- Chevin FleetWave is most often used for a smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance tracking, a mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate tools, an operation needing total cost of ownership reporting broken down by vehicle and asset type, a fleet outgrowing fleetwave lite and needing core or advanced tier compliance and reporting depth. Of those, a smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance tracking and a mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate tools are not what Mapillary is typically brought in for.
- What can Chevin FleetWave do that Mapillary cannot?
- Chevin FleetWave covers Maintenance scheduling, Compliance tracking, Fuel management, Total cost of ownership reporting. Mapillary covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chevin FleetWave: Is FleetWave pricing public?
Only for the Lite tier, at £3 per vehicle per month plus $0.50 per equipment asset. Core and Advanced tiers require a consultation.
Mapillary: What is the pricing model for Mapillary?
Mapillary does not publish pricing information on its main website pages. The platform focuses on features like street-level imagery access, map updating through computer vision, and open data sharing, but specific costs and licensing tiers are not disclosed publicly.
SourceChevin FleetWave: What is the difference between Lite, Core and Advanced?
Lite is a simpler feature set for smaller or less complex fleets; Core and Advanced add compliance, TCO and multi-asset reporting depth, priced separately.
Mapillary: Can I use Mapillary for commercial purposes?
Specific details about commercial licensing for Mapillary are not published on the main website. Interested businesses should contact Mapillary directly through their support channels to discuss commercial use cases and licensing options.
SourceChevin FleetWave: Does it track non-vehicle equipment?
Yes, equipment and associated assets are tracked within the same platform, priced separately from vehicles.
Mapillary: Is Mapillary free to use for individual contributors?
Mapillary emphasizes open data sharing and community contributions but specific details about free vs. paid access for individuals are not clearly stated on the main website. Contact Mapillary support for clarification on access terms.
SourceRelated pages
More on Chevin FleetWave
Other head to heads
- Chevin FleetWave vs Samsara
- Chevin FleetWave vs AssetWorks
- Chevin FleetWave vs Geotab
- Chevin FleetWave vs Verizon Connect
- Chevin FleetWave vs Azuga
- Chevin FleetWave vs Omnitracs
- Chevin FleetWave vs Whip Around
- Chevin FleetWave vs Fleet Complete
- Chevin FleetWave vs CalAmp
- Chevin FleetWave vs Uptake
- Chevin FleetWave vs Motive
- Chevin FleetWave vs Route4Me
- Chevin FleetWave vs Lytx
- Chevin FleetWave vs NexTraq
- Chevin FleetWave vs Quartix
- Chevin FleetWave vs Ridecell
- Chevin FleetWave vs Webfleet
- Chevin FleetWave vs Mapbox
- Chevin FleetWave vs Google Maps Platform
- Chevin FleetWave vs HERE Technologies
- Chevin FleetWave vs Apple Maps
- Chevin FleetWave vs Bing Maps
- Chevin FleetWave vs CesiumJS
- Chevin FleetWave vs Ride with GPS
- Chevin FleetWave vs AllTrails
- Chevin FleetWave vs Gaia GPS
- Chevin FleetWave vs Correlator3D
- Chevin FleetWave vs Emlid Studio
- Chevin FleetWave vs Foursquare Places API
- Chevin FleetWave vs Kepler.gl
- Chevin FleetWave vs Trailforks
- Chevin FleetWave vs Cesium ion
- Chevin FleetWave vs Citymapper
- Mapillary vs Samsara
- Mapillary vs AssetWorks
- Mapillary vs Geotab
- Mapillary vs Verizon Connect
- Mapillary vs Azuga
- Mapillary vs Omnitracs
- Mapillary vs Whip Around
- Mapillary vs Fleet Complete
- Mapillary vs CalAmp
- Mapillary vs Uptake
- Mapillary vs Motive
- Mapillary vs Route4Me
- Mapillary vs Lytx
- Mapillary vs NexTraq
- Mapillary vs Quartix
- Mapillary vs Ridecell
- Mapillary vs Webfleet
- Mapillary vs Mapbox
- Mapillary vs Google Maps Platform
- Mapillary vs HERE Technologies
- Mapillary vs Apple Maps
- Mapillary vs Bing Maps
- Mapillary vs CesiumJS
- Mapillary vs Ride with GPS
- Mapillary vs AllTrails
- Mapillary vs Gaia GPS
- Mapillary vs Correlator3D
- Mapillary vs Emlid Studio
- Mapillary vs Foursquare Places API
- Mapillary vs Kepler.gl
- Mapillary vs Trailforks
- Mapillary vs Cesium ion
- Mapillary vs Citymapper
