Legal · head to head
CASEpeer vs Cookiebot

CASEpeer
Legal
Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms
- From
- $79/month
- Rated
- -

Cookiebot
Legal
Automated cookie scanning and consent banner for websites, owned by Usercentrics
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cookiebot has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CASEpeer it is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.; Cookiebot pricing is per domain and banded by subpage count, so an organisation with many brand domains or a large content site pays many multiples of the 7 euro headline, and the bands are counted from the scan rather than from what you think you publish.
- They diverge on capability: CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Cookiebot covers Automated cookie scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CASEpeer and Cookiebot actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CASEpeer
- Intake and case screening
- Medical treatment tracking
- Settlement and lien management
- Negotiation tracking
- Statute of limitations monitoring
Only in Cookiebot
- Automated cookie scanning
- Prior blocking
- Google Consent Mode v2
- IAB TCF support
- Consent logging
- Cookie declaration
- Multi-language banners
- Geotargeting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CASEpeer
- Plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien trackingnot Cookiebot
- Contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one placenot Cookiebot
- Personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measurednot Cookiebot
- Firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseloadnot Cookiebot
Cookiebot
- A marketing team that needs a defensible consent record for European visitors without adding privacy engineering headcountnot CASEpeer
- A site using Google Ads and Analytics that must send Consent Mode v2 signals or lose conversion measurement in the EEAnot CASEpeer
- An agency managing many small client sites that wants per-domain billing it can pass through at costnot CASEpeer
- A content-heavy publisher needing IAB TCF signals passed to advertising partnersnot CASEpeer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CASEpeer
- It is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.
- There is no full double-entry general ledger, so the firm still needs separate accounting software and somebody to reconcile between the two.
- The narrow personal injury focus means a practice that diversifies into family, employment or criminal work has to run a second system or migrate.
- It has changed corporate hands three times since 2021, from independent to MyCase to AffiniPay, now trading as 8am, so roadmap continuity is a fair question to put to the vendor.
- Sitting in the 8am group aligns it with LawPay and MyCase, so firms committed to a different payments provider get less from the integrations.
Cookiebot
- Pricing is per domain and banded by subpage count, so an organisation with many brand domains or a large content site pays many multiples of the 7 euro headline, and the bands are counted from the scan rather than from what you think you publish.
- Enterprise features such as single sign-on, banner A and B testing and a dedicated account manager sit on Usercentrics Web CMP rather than on Cookiebot, so growing out of Cookiebot means migrating to a sibling product with its own dashboard and contract.
- Prior blocking depends on Cookiebot recognising the script, and custom or first-party tags frequently need manual tagging, which means a site can believe it is blocking trackers when it is not until someone audits it.
- Scans crawl a limited number of subpages per band, so trackers that only appear on deep or gated pages can go undiscovered and unblocked between scans.
- The free tier carries Cookiebot branding and is limited to one domain and 50 subpages, which makes it a demonstration rather than a workable option for anything but a brochure site.
Pricing, plan by plan
CASEpeer
$79/month- Basic$79/month
- Personal injury case management
- Intake and treatment tracking
- No minimum seat count
- Pro$119/month
- Adds reporting and automation
- Lien and settlement tracking
- No long-term contract required
- Advanced$149/month
- Full feature set
- Advanced reporting
- No long-term contract required
Cookiebot
Free- FreeFree
- 1 domain, up to 50 subpages
- Automated scanning
- Google Consent Mode
- Premium Lite$7/month
- 1 domain, up to 50 subpages
- Custom banner design and logo
- Multi-language banners
- Premium Small$15/month
- Per domain
- Up to 350 subpages per domain
- Multiple domains supported
- Premium Medium$30/month
- Per domain
- Up to 3,500 subpages per domain
Which should you pick?
Choose CASEpeer if
- You need intake and case screening.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want medical treatment tracking.
Choose Cookiebot if
- You need automated cookie scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want prior blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is CASEpeer or Cookiebot better?
- Neither clearly leads. CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Cookiebot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CASEpeer or Cookiebot?
- Cookiebot has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $79/month for CASEpeer and Free for Cookiebot.
- Does CASEpeer or Cookiebot run on more platforms?
- CASEpeer runs on Web, iOS, Android. Cookiebot runs on Web.
- Can I use Cookiebot for free?
- Yes. Cookiebot has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CASEpeer starts at $79/month.
- What is CASEpeer best used for?
- CASEpeer is most often used for plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking, contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place, personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measured, firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseload. Of those, plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking and contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place are not what Cookiebot is typically brought in for.
- What can CASEpeer do that Cookiebot cannot?
- CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Medical treatment tracking, Settlement and lien management, Negotiation tracking. Cookiebot covers Automated cookie scanning, Prior blocking, Google Consent Mode v2, IAB TCF support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CASEpeer: Is CASEpeer suitable for a corporate or defence firm?
No. It is built around contingency personal injury work: treatment, liens and settlement. A corporate firm billing hourly should look at Clio, Tabs3 or a large firm system instead.
Cookiebot: Who owns Cookiebot?
Usercentrics, which acquired the Danish developer Cybot in September 2021. It is sold as Cookiebot by Usercentrics alongside the separate Usercentrics Web CMP.
CASEpeer: What does CASEpeer cost?
Published per-user rates are 79 USD for Basic, 119 USD for Pro and 149 USD for Advanced per month, with no minimum seat count and no long-term contract required.
Cookiebot: What does a real deployment cost?
Between 7 and 90 euros per domain per month depending on subpage count. Ten domains on the medium band is 300 euros a month, not 7.
CASEpeer: Who owns CASEpeer?
It was acquired by MyCase in March 2021 and moved to AffiniPay in June 2022. AffiniPay rebranded to 8am in August 2025, so CASEpeer now sits alongside MyCase and LawPay in that group.
Cookiebot: Does it support Google Consent Mode v2?
Yes, and Cookiebot is in Google CMP partner programme, which matters if you run Google advertising into the EEA.
Cookiebot: Is the free plan usable in production?
Only for a single very small site. It caps at one domain and 50 subpages and shows Cookiebot branding on the banner.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CASEpeer vs Filevine
- CASEpeer vs Clio
- CASEpeer vs MyCase
- CASEpeer vs LexisNexis
- CASEpeer vs Docketwise
- CASEpeer vs Litify
- CASEpeer vs Relativity
- CASEpeer vs Everlaw
- CASEpeer vs Smokeball
- CASEpeer vs Logikcull
- CASEpeer vs DISCO
- CASEpeer vs iManage
- CASEpeer vs Intapp
- CASEpeer vs Litera
- CASEpeer vs Rocket Matter
- CASEpeer vs Secure Privacy
- CASEpeer vs Tabs3
- CASEpeer vs Didomi
- CASEpeer vs iubenda
- CASEpeer vs CosmoLex
- CASEpeer vs Lawmatics
- CASEpeer vs Aderant
- CASEpeer vs Ironclad
- CASEpeer vs Westlaw
- CASEpeer vs Harvey
- Cookiebot vs Filevine
- Cookiebot vs Clio
- Cookiebot vs MyCase
- Cookiebot vs LexisNexis
- Cookiebot vs Docketwise
- Cookiebot vs Litify
- Cookiebot vs Relativity
- Cookiebot vs Everlaw
- Cookiebot vs Smokeball
- Cookiebot vs Logikcull
- Cookiebot vs DISCO
- Cookiebot vs iManage
- Cookiebot vs Intapp
- Cookiebot vs Litera
- Cookiebot vs Rocket Matter
- Cookiebot vs Secure Privacy
- Cookiebot vs Tabs3
- Cookiebot vs Didomi
- Cookiebot vs iubenda
- Cookiebot vs CosmoLex
- Cookiebot vs Lawmatics
- Cookiebot vs Aderant
- Cookiebot vs Ironclad
- Cookiebot vs Westlaw
- Cookiebot vs Harvey
