Softwr

Accounting · head to head

Carta vs RazorpayX

Carta logo

Carta

Accounting

Cap table, equity and 409A valuation software built around United States private company practice

From
$29/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
RazorpayX logo

RazorpayX

Accounting

Indian business banking layer for current accounts, automated payouts, vendor payments and payroll

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Carta pricing scales with the number of stakeholders on the cap table, so a company that grants options broadly pays a rising annual fee for employees and small angels who sign in once a year, and the cost keeps climbing after the round that justified it is spent.; RazorpayX everything is India specific, the rails, the currency, the statutory deductions and the filings, so a company that redomiciles or expands abroad gets no reuse and has to run a second banking and payroll stack in the new jurisdiction.
  • They diverge on capability: Carta covers Cap table of record, RazorpayX covers Current account.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Carta and RazorpayX actually diverge.

Attributes where Carta and RazorpayX differ
AttributeCartaRazorpayX
Starting price$29/monthOn request
Pricing modelsubscriptionusage-based
PlatformsWeb, Ios, AndroidWeb
Founded2012Unknown

Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Carta

  • Cap table of record
  • 409A valuations
  • Electronic issuance
  • Vesting and exercise
  • Employee portal
  • Scenario modelling
  • Waterfall analysis
  • ASC 718 expense reporting

Only in RazorpayX

  • Current account
  • Payout API
  • Bulk payouts
  • Payout links
  • Vendor payments
  • Payroll
  • Statutory filing support
  • Corporate cards

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Carta

  • A startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read itnot RazorpayX
  • A company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409A before it can set a strike pricenot RazorpayX
  • A finance team preparing its first audit and needing ASC 718 stock compensation schedules that tie to the grant recordsnot RazorpayX
  • A venture fund that wants LP reporting, capital calls and SPV administration handled outside a spreadsheetnot RazorpayX

RazorpayX

  • An Indian marketplace settling thousands of seller payouts on a schedule that no bank portal can supportnot Carta
  • A startup running payroll for a growing team that needs provident fund, employee state insurance and tax deduction handled without an in house specialistnot Carta
  • A company paying many vendors monthly that needs tax deducted at source calculated and recorded against each paymentnot Carta
  • A product team that needs disbursements to happen from application code with webhook confirmation rather than from a treasury spreadsheetnot Carta

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Carta

  • Pricing scales with the number of stakeholders on the cap table, so a company that grants options broadly pays a rising annual fee for employees and small angels who sign in once a year, and the cost keeps climbing after the round that justified it is spent.
  • The cap table is a legal record assembled from years of board consents, so migrating to another provider means re-entering historical transactions and having counsel confirm the rebuilt table matches the signed documents, which is why most companies stay whatever they think of the service.
  • The product is built around United States company law and tax practice, Delaware entities, 409A and ASC 718, so a company incorporated in the United Kingdom, Europe or elsewhere gets a record keeping tool while the valuation and compliance features that carry the price are of limited or no use.
  • 409A valuations are delivered on a cadence and require a refresh after each material event or every twelve months, so a company that raises or changes materially is repeatedly back in a valuation process with fees and turnaround time attached, and a late valuation blocks option issuance.
  • Carta drew sustained criticism in 2024 over how customer cap table data intersected with its secondary trading business, and although it exited that activity the episode is a live reason to check what a vendor holding your ownership record is permitted to do with it.

RazorpayX

  • Everything is India specific, the rails, the currency, the statutory deductions and the filings, so a company that redomiciles or expands abroad gets no reuse and has to run a second banking and payroll stack in the new jurisdiction.
  • The current account is held with a partner bank while the interface and the relationship belong to Razorpay, so an escalation about the account itself can fall between two organisations and the deposit protection you have depends on the bank, not on the fintech.
  • Indian payment fintechs are subject to active central bank intervention, and Razorpay itself spent a period unable to onboard new merchants following a regulatory direction, so single provider concentration for both collections and payouts is a live continuity risk rather than a theoretical one.
  • Payouts carry per transaction charges beyond an included allowance and payroll is charged per employee, so a high volume settlement business or a company hiring quickly finds the running cost scales directly with the activity that made the product attractive.
  • Support is largely ticket based and account management is reserved for larger accounts, so a failed high value payout or a payroll run that does not credit becomes a queue rather than a call, which is a poor position to be in on a salary date.

Pricing, plan by plan

Carta

$29/month
  • LaunchFree
    • Cap table
    • Stakeholder management
  • Seed$360/year
    • 409A valuations
    • Option exercising
    • Scenarios

RazorpayX

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the RazorpayX review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Carta if

  • You need cap table of record.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want 409a valuations.
Carta review

Choose RazorpayX if

  • You need current account.
  • You also want payout api.
RazorpayX review

Questions people ask

Is Carta or RazorpayX better?
Neither clearly leads. Carta starts at $29/month and RazorpayX at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Carta or RazorpayX?
Carta starts at $29/month and RazorpayX at On request.
Does Carta or RazorpayX run on more platforms?
Carta runs on Web, Ios, Android. RazorpayX runs on Web.
What is Carta best used for?
Carta is most often used for a startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read it, a company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409a before it can set a strike price, a finance team preparing its first audit and needing asc 718 stock compensation schedules that tie to the grant records, a venture fund that wants lp reporting, capital calls and spv administration handled outside a spreadsheet. Of those, a startup that has just closed a priced round and whose investors and counsel expect the cap table to live somewhere they can read it and a company issuing options to employees for the first time and needing a defensible 409a before it can set a strike price are not what RazorpayX is typically brought in for.
What can Carta do that RazorpayX cannot?
Carta covers Cap table of record, 409A valuations, Electronic issuance, Vesting and exercise. RazorpayX covers Current account, Payout API, Bulk payouts, Payout links.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Carta: Do I need Carta before I have employees with options?

No. Before options exist a spreadsheet reviewed by your lawyer is usually enough. The pressure to move normally comes at a priced round, or the first time you need a 409A to set a strike price.

RazorpayX: Is RazorpayX a bank?

No. The current account is provided by partner banks. RazorpayX supplies the interface, the payout automation and the payroll and compliance layer on top of it.

Carta: Is the 409A included in the subscription?

The subscription tiers bundle valuations differently and refreshes after material events can carry additional cost. Check what triggers a chargeable revaluation before you sign, because raising a round is exactly the moment you will need one.

RazorpayX: Can a company registered outside India use it?

No. It serves Indian registered entities, rupee accounts and Indian statutory requirements.

Carta: Can my accountant get the stock compensation numbers out of it?

Yes, it produces ASC 718 expense schedules and exports. If your accounts are prepared under a different framework, expect the schedules to be a starting point that your accountant reworks rather than something they post directly.

RazorpayX: Does the payroll module handle statutory compliance?

It calculates and supports the main statutory items, provident fund, employee state insurance, professional tax and income tax deduction, and assists with the periodic filings. Confirm the scope against your state specific obligations, since professional tax in particular varies.

Carta: Is it useful for a company outside the United States?

It can hold the share register and grants, and it does support some non United States structures. The 409A and United States tax workflow will not apply to you, so weigh it against local alternatives that understand your filings.

RazorpayX: What happens to my payouts if there is a regulatory action against Razorpay?

That has happened before in the form of a restriction on onboarding new merchants. Existing customers continued, but the episode is the reason many businesses keep a bank relationship and a second payout route alive alongside it.

Carta: How hard is it to leave?

Harder than the export button suggests. You can export the data, but the receiving system has to reproduce every historical grant, cancellation and transfer, and someone has to verify the result against the original signed consents.

RazorpayX: Does it connect to accounting software?

It integrates with the Indian accounting tools most of its customers use, so payouts and payroll postings do not have to be rekeyed. Check your specific product rather than assuming, because coverage is narrower than for global ledgers.

Carta: Who normally pays for it, the company or the investors?

The company, even though investors and counsel are frequent users. That is the usual complaint about the pricing model: the party paying is not the only party benefiting.

RazorpayX: How is it priced?

A plan fee with included payout volumes, per transaction charges beyond that, and a per employee charge for payroll. Model your actual payout count rather than the plan headline, because that is where the cost lands.

Share

Related pages

More on Carta

More on RazorpayX

Keep looking

Other head to heads