Accounting · head to head
Airbase vs DATEV

Airbase
Accounting
Spend management combining corporate cards, bill payment and expense claims, now part of Paylocity
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -

DATEV
Accounting
German accounting, payroll and tax software built around the tax adviser rather than the business
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Airbase card issuing and bill payment are built around United States entities and United States bank accounts, so a group with subsidiaries abroad keeps running local card and payment processes alongside and does not get the single ledger of spend that justified the purchase.; DATEV dATEV does not publish transparent per-customer pricing the way a SaaS vendor does; your real cost is buried in your tax adviser's fee note, so comparing it against Lexware or sevdesk on price is genuinely hard.
- They diverge on capability: Airbase covers Corporate cards, DATEV covers Unternehmen online.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Airbase and DATEV actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Airbase
- Corporate cards
- Virtual cards per vendor
- Bill payment
- Expense reimbursement
- Unified approval policy
- Purchase intake and procurement
- Automated coding
- Receipt collection
Only in DATEV
- Unternehmen online
- Lohn und Gehalt
- Rechnungswesen
- Jahresabschluss
- DATEV DMS
- Meine Steuern
- DATEV-Schnittstelle
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Airbase
- A company that has outgrown one shared company card and needs per person and per subscription cards with real limitsnot DATEV
- A finance team where supplier invoices arrive in an inbox and approval is whoever replies, with no record afterwardsnot DATEV
- A controller trying to close the month without rebuilding card and expense coding from statements every timenot DATEV
- An organisation that wants spend approved before it is committed rather than discovered when the invoice arrivesnot DATEV
DATEV
- A German GmbH that wants its Steuerberater to keep doing the books but wants receipts to stop travelling in a shoeboxnot Airbase
- A payroll department that must file social insurance and wage tax returns to German statutory deadlines without an external bureaunot Airbase
- An SME preparing an e-Bilanz and audit-ready GoBD document archivenot Airbase
- A tax firm standardising dozens of client engagements on one chart of accounts and one document workflownot Airbase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Airbase
- Card issuing and bill payment are built around United States entities and United States bank accounts, so a group with subsidiaries abroad keeps running local card and payment processes alongside and does not get the single ledger of spend that justified the purchase.
- The value depends on nearly all spend flowing through the platform, which makes partial adoption almost worthless and means the rollout is a change management exercise across every budget holder rather than a finance department deployment.
- Paylocity's acquisition in 2024 reorients the roadmap towards a human capital management suite, so expense reimbursement is likely to be well served while procurement and the more finance specific features compete for attention with payroll and HR priorities.
- Pricing combines a platform fee with tiering on features and users, and part of the economics rests on interchange rebates from card spend, so a company that puts most of its spend on transfers rather than cards pays the fee without earning the offset.
- The general ledger sync is a mapping you own, so a chart of accounts change, a new department dimension or a ledger migration means reworking the coding rules, and a bad mapping quietly posts correct approvals to the wrong accounts.
DATEV
- DATEV does not publish transparent per-customer pricing the way a SaaS vendor does; your real cost is buried in your tax adviser's fee note, so comparing it against Lexware or sevdesk on price is genuinely hard.
- The board has decided to wind down the Austria-specific portfolio: existing products remain usable to 31 December 2028, are free of charge during 2029, and cannot be used after 31 December 2029, so any Austrian entity on DATEV has a forced migration dated in advance.
- It is built for German statutory practice, so a group with subsidiaries outside the DACH region will run DATEV for Germany and something else everywhere else, with a consolidation step in between.
- Large parts of the suite are still Windows desktop software installed on a workstation or terminal server, which means IT overhead most companies no longer budget for when they think they are buying cloud accounting.
- The lock-in is social as well as technical: because your adviser holds the installation and the history, changing accounting software usually forces you to change or retrain your adviser, which is a far bigger decision than a software migration.
Pricing, plan by plan
Airbase
$29/month- StandardFree
- Corporate cards
- Expense reports
- Bill pay
- Premium$10/month
- Advanced approvals
- NetSuite sync
- Procurement
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Custom workflows
- API access
- Dedicated support
DATEV
On request- DATEV Unternehmen online$undefined/month
- Receipt and bank data exchange with your tax adviser
- Cash book and master data modules
- Ordered and usually rebilled through the adviser
- DATEV Mittelstand$undefined/month
- In-house financial accounting and invoicing
- Payroll modules licensed separately
- Per-workplace licensing
- Lohn und Gehalt$undefined/month
- German payroll runs and statutory electronic filings
- Priced by number of payslips
- Typically operated by the adviser on the client's behalf
Which should you pick?
Choose Airbase if
- You need corporate cards.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want virtual cards per vendor.
Choose DATEV if
- You need unternehmen online.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want lohn und gehalt.
Questions people ask
- Is Airbase or DATEV better?
- Neither clearly leads. Airbase starts at $29/month and DATEV at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Airbase or DATEV?
- Airbase starts at $29/month and DATEV at On request.
- Does Airbase or DATEV run on more platforms?
- Airbase runs on Web, Ios, Android. DATEV runs on Windows, Web.
- What is Airbase best used for?
- Airbase is most often used for a company that has outgrown one shared company card and needs per person and per subscription cards with real limits, a finance team where supplier invoices arrive in an inbox and approval is whoever replies, with no record afterwards, a controller trying to close the month without rebuilding card and expense coding from statements every time, an organisation that wants spend approved before it is committed rather than discovered when the invoice arrives. Of those, a company that has outgrown one shared company card and needs per person and per subscription cards with real limits and a finance team where supplier invoices arrive in an inbox and approval is whoever replies, with no record afterwards are not what DATEV is typically brought in for.
- What can Airbase do that DATEV cannot?
- Airbase covers Corporate cards, Virtual cards per vendor, Bill payment, Expense reimbursement. DATEV covers Unternehmen online, Lohn und Gehalt, Rechnungswesen, Jahresabschluss.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Airbase: Does it work for companies outside the United States?
Partially. Some international spend and reimbursement is supported, but card issuing and the payment rails are strongest for United States entities. Confirm coverage for each country you operate in before assuming it replaces local processes.
DATEV: Can I buy DATEV directly without a tax adviser?
In practice, no for most of the range. Membership of the cooperative is restricted to the tax and legal professions, and companies get access through their adviser or as a client of one.
Airbase: Does Airbase replace our accounting system?
No. It manages spend and pushes coded transactions into the ledger. QuickBooks, NetSuite or whatever else you use stays.
DATEV: Is DATEV usable outside Germany?
It operates in Austria, Italy, Spain, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Hungary, but the depth is German. The Austrian product line is being discontinued with a hard end date of 31 December 2029.
Airbase: What changed after the Paylocity acquisition?
Ownership and roadmap direction. The product continues, now positioned alongside Paylocity's payroll and HR products. If procurement is your main reason to buy, ask directly about investment in that module.
DATEV: What is the DATEV-Schnittstelle everyone mentions?
It is the standard export format German invoicing and ERP tools produce so bookkeeping data can be handed to a DATEV-based adviser. Supporting it is effectively a requirement to sell accounting-adjacent software in Germany.
Airbase: How is it priced?
A platform subscription with tiers, plus usage and user dimensions, partly offset by rebates on card spend. Because the rebate depends on card volume, model your own mix of card versus transfer spend before accepting a payback figure.
DATEV: Does DATEV handle e-invoicing under the German B2B mandate?
Yes, the accounting and invoicing modules were extended for the XRechnung and ZUGFeRD formats that the German B2B e-invoicing rules require.
Airbase: Can we use it for accounts payable only?
You can, but the approval consistency argument weakens considerably. Most of the reported benefit comes from cards, bills and reimbursements sharing one policy and one coding process.
Airbase: Will our auditors accept the approval records?
The per transaction record of approver, receipt and coding is generally what auditors want to see for spend testing. Agree the sampling approach with them early, particularly around any spend that still happens outside the platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Airbase vs Ramp
- Airbase vs Spendesk
- Airbase vs Fyle
- Airbase vs Brex
- Airbase vs Divvy
- Airbase vs SAP Concur
- Airbase vs Medius
- Airbase vs Tipalti
- Airbase vs Spendbase
- Airbase vs Plaid
- Airbase vs Wise Business
- Airbase vs Stampli
- Airbase vs Invoicera
- Airbase vs Lago
- Airbase vs Metronome
- Airbase vs Modern Treasury
- Airbase vs Moss
- Airbase vs RazorpayX
- Airbase vs Sage 50
- Airbase vs Lexware
- Airbase vs sevdesk
- Airbase vs Paychex
- Airbase vs QuickBooks
- Airbase vs ADP
- Airbase vs Bill.com
- Airbase vs FloQast
- Airbase vs Xero
- Airbase vs Zoho Books
- Airbase vs Money Forward Cloud
- Airbase vs Conta Azul
- Airbase vs Creem
- Airbase vs Dinero
- Airbase vs Dodo Payments
- Airbase vs Empower
- DATEV vs Ramp
- DATEV vs Spendesk
- DATEV vs Fyle
- DATEV vs Brex
- DATEV vs Divvy
- DATEV vs SAP Concur
- DATEV vs Medius
- DATEV vs Tipalti
- DATEV vs Spendbase
- DATEV vs Plaid
- DATEV vs Wise Business
- DATEV vs Stampli
- DATEV vs Invoicera
- DATEV vs Lago
- DATEV vs Metronome
- DATEV vs Modern Treasury
- DATEV vs Moss
- DATEV vs RazorpayX
- DATEV vs Sage 50
- DATEV vs Lexware
- DATEV vs sevdesk
- DATEV vs Paychex
- DATEV vs QuickBooks
- DATEV vs ADP
- DATEV vs Bill.com
- DATEV vs FloQast
- DATEV vs Xero
- DATEV vs Zoho Books
- DATEV vs Money Forward Cloud
- DATEV vs Conta Azul
- DATEV vs Creem
- DATEV vs Dinero
- DATEV vs Dodo Payments
- DATEV vs Empower
