Databases · head to head
Canary Labs vs Qdrant

Canary Labs
Databases
Industrial process historian with published per-tag pricing and no client licence fees
- From
- $3000/year
- Rated
- -

Qdrant
Databases
High-performance vector database for similarity search and embedding-based retrieval
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Qdrant has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Canary Labs pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.; Qdrant free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Canary Labs and Qdrant actually diverge.
| Attribute | Canary Labs | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Per tag band per year | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming) |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Canary Labs
- Loss-less compression
- Unlimited clients
- Store and forward
- Views service
- Sparkplug B
- Calculation engine
- Axiom
- ODBC and REST
Only in Qdrant
Nothing recorded that Canary Labs does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Canary Labs
- A manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a PI System enterprise agreementnot Qdrant
- A water utility replacing SCADA-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next SCADA replacementnot Qdrant
- An Ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboardsnot Qdrant
- A plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an auditnot Qdrant
Qdrant
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backends for LLM applicationsnot Canary Labs
- Semantic search across large document corporanot Canary Labs
- Multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systemsnot Canary Labs
- Similarity-based product or content recommendationsnot Canary Labs
- Real-time vector indexing for streaming embedding datanot Canary Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Canary Labs
- Pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.
- CustomerCare at 18 percent of licence cost is effectively mandatory on perpetual licences because lapsing it removes upgrades, so the perpetual option is not really a one-time cost.
- The storage format is proprietary; getting data out at volume means the ODBC connector, an additional 2,500 USD one-time or 1,000 USD a year, or writing against the REST API.
- Canary is a small vendor with a limited partner network outside North America, so support coverage and integrator availability in Europe and Asia are thinner than for AVEVA or Ignition.
- It is a Windows-only server product with no Linux or container deployment, which complicates placing collectors in modern edge estates.
Qdrant
- Free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
- Standard and Premium pricing usage-based; specific costs not published; requires calculator or quote
- Requires understanding of embeddings and vector search concepts; not suitable for SQL-only teams
- Early-stage serverless offering (coming soon) suggests maturity gaps in that deployment model
Pricing, plan by plan
Canary Labs
$3000/year- Subscription, 3,500 tags$3000/year
- Unlimited Axiom clients
- Unlimited Excel clients
- Support and upgrades included
- Perpetual, 3,500 tags$8730/one-time
- 7,400 USD licence plus 1,330 USD first-year CustomerCare
- CustomerCare renews at 18 percent of licence cost per year
- Unlimited clients
- Private cloud, 3,500 tags$12320/year
- Hosted by Canary
- 1,500 USD one-time setup fee per system
- Scales to around 58,684 USD per year at 60,000 tags
- Enterprise unlimited$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags
- Negotiated licensing terms
- Quoted pricing
Qdrant
Free- FreeFree
- Single-node cluster
- 0.5 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
- Standard$undefined/usage-based
- Dedicated resources
- Flexible scaling
- High availability
- Premium$undefined/minimum spend
- SSO and SAML
- Private VPC links
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Canary Labs if
- You need loss-less compression.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want unlimited clients.
Choose Qdrant if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
Questions people ask
- Is Canary Labs or Qdrant better?
- Neither clearly leads. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year and Qdrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Canary Labs or Qdrant?
- Qdrant has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3000/year for Canary Labs and Free for Qdrant.
- Does Canary Labs or Qdrant run on more platforms?
- Canary Labs runs on Windows, Web. Qdrant runs on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
- Can I use Qdrant for free?
- Yes. Qdrant has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year.
- What is Canary Labs best used for?
- Canary Labs is most often used for a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement, a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement, an ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboards, a plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an audit. Of those, a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement and a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement are not what Qdrant is typically brought in for.
- What can Canary Labs do that Qdrant cannot?
- Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, Unlimited clients, Store and forward, Views service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Canary Labs: What does Canary cost?
8,730 USD for a 3,500 tag perpetual system including first-year CustomerCare, or 3,000 USD a year on subscription.
Qdrant: Can I use Qdrant for free?
Yes, Qdrant offers a free tier that provides a single node cluster with 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 4GB disk space. It includes free cloud inference with selected models and is described as free forever for testing and prototypes.
SourceCanary Labs: Are client licences extra?
No. Unlimited Axiom browser clients and unlimited Excel clients are included on every tier.
Qdrant: How is Qdrant Cloud billing calculated?
Billing is calculated based on actual resource usage during each billing period. You are charged hourly for compute (vCPU), memory (GB), storage (GB), backups, and any paid inference tokens used.
SourceCanary Labs: Is perpetual cheaper than subscription?
Canary states perpetual pays off after roughly three years, and after that you still pay 18 percent CustomerCare annually.
Qdrant: What happens if I scale beyond the free tier?
The Standard Tier uses the same usage-based billing model as the free tier but adds features like dedicated resources with flexible scaling, highly available setups with backup and disaster recovery, and a 99.5% uptime SLA.
SourceCanary Labs: Does it use lossy compression?
No. Canary stores every collected value rather than approximating the trend, which matters for regulated data retention.
Qdrant: What SLA does Qdrant offer?
The Standard Tier provides 99.5% uptime SLA. The Premium Tier, which requires a minimum spend for enterprises, offers 99.9% uptime SLA along with single sign-on and private VPC links.
SourceQdrant: Are there dedicated cloud infrastructure options?
Yes, Qdrant offers Hybrid Cloud (runs on your infrastructure) and Private Cloud (complete isolation) options, both with custom pricing that requires contacting the sales team.
SourceRelated pages
More on Canary Labs
Other head to heads
- Canary Labs vs VerneMQ
- Canary Labs vs EMQX
- Canary Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Canary Labs vs QuestDB
- Canary Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Canary Labs vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Canary Labs vs Apache Doris
- Canary Labs vs Convex
- Canary Labs vs Instaclustr
- Canary Labs vs Cockroach Labs
- Canary Labs vs Meilisearch
- Canary Labs vs DuckDB
- Canary Labs vs BigQuery
- Canary Labs vs CosmosDB
- Canary Labs vs DataStax
- Canary Labs vs dbt
- Canary Labs vs FaunaDB
- Canary Labs vs Zilliz
- Canary Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Canary Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Canary Labs vs Airtable
- Canary Labs vs Chroma
- Canary Labs vs Vespa
- Canary Labs vs YugabyteDB
- Canary Labs vs NATS
- Canary Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Canary Labs vs Apache Druid
- Canary Labs vs Grist
- Canary Labs vs IBM Db2
- Canary Labs vs Knack
- Canary Labs vs LanceDB
- Canary Labs vs Marqo
- Qdrant vs VerneMQ
- Qdrant vs EMQX
- Qdrant vs TimescaleDB
- Qdrant vs QuestDB
- Qdrant vs Solace PubSub+
- Qdrant vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Qdrant vs Apache Doris
- Qdrant vs Convex
- Qdrant vs Instaclustr
- Qdrant vs Cockroach Labs
- Qdrant vs Meilisearch
- Qdrant vs DuckDB
- Qdrant vs BigQuery
- Qdrant vs CosmosDB
- Qdrant vs DataStax
- Qdrant vs dbt
- Qdrant vs FaunaDB
- Qdrant vs Zilliz
- Qdrant vs PostgreSQL
- Qdrant vs Amazon Aurora
- Qdrant vs Airtable
- Qdrant vs Chroma
- Qdrant vs Vespa
- Qdrant vs YugabyteDB
- Qdrant vs NATS
- Qdrant vs Elasticsearch
- Qdrant vs Apache Druid
- Qdrant vs Grist
- Qdrant vs IBM Db2
- Qdrant vs Knack
- Qdrant vs LanceDB
- Qdrant vs Marqo
