Customer Support · head to head
Calabrio ONE vs Reply.io

Calabrio ONE
Customer Support
Workforce management, quality and analytics suite for contact centres, now owned by Verint
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Reply.io
CRM
Multichannel sales engagement platform for email, LinkedIn, calls and SMS outreach
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only Reply.io has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Calabrio ONE ownership changed in November 2025 when Thoma Bravo took Verint private and merged it with Calabrio, so the product is no longer the independent alternative to Verint that most shortlists put it on for, and roadmap priorities across two overlapping suites will be decided by one company.; Reply.io multichannel features and CRM sync require the higher-priced Professional tier or above.
- They diverge on capability: Calabrio ONE covers Intelligent forecasting, Reply.io covers Multichannel sequences.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Calabrio ONE and Reply.io actually diverge.
| Attribute | Calabrio ONE | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | web, api |
| Category | Customer Support | CRM |
| Founded | Unknown | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Calabrio ONE
- Intelligent forecasting
- Automated scheduling
- Intraday optimisation
- Real-time adherence
- Agent self-service
- Call and screen recording
- Quality management
- Speech and desktop analytics
Only in Reply.io
- Multichannel sequences
- Contact database
- AI email assistant
- Deliverability tools
- CRM sync
- Reporting and analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Calabrio ONE
- A 1,200-seat contact centre on Amazon Connect needing forecasting and adherence that the native scheduling tools do not providenot Reply.io
- A multi-site operation replacing spreadsheet rostering that no longer copes with skills-based routing and part-time shift patternsnot Reply.io
- A retailer forecasting seasonal contact volume across voice, chat and email to decide temporary hiring numbers months aheadnot Reply.io
- A compliance-bound centre needing call and screen recording with retention and redaction controls independent of its telephony vendornot Reply.io
Reply.io
- Running multichannel outbound sequences combining email and LinkedInnot Calabrio ONE
- Automating cold calling and SMS follow-ups alongside emailnot Calabrio ONE
- Finding new B2B prospects from a built-in contact databasenot Calabrio ONE
- Syncing outreach activity into an existing CRMnot Calabrio ONE
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Calabrio ONE
- Ownership changed in November 2025 when Thoma Bravo took Verint private and merged it with Calabrio, so the product is no longer the independent alternative to Verint that most shortlists put it on for, and roadmap priorities across two overlapping suites will be decided by one company.
- The combined business has run substantial layoffs following the buyout, which raises real questions about support responsiveness and module investment that a prospective buyer should press on in contract negotiation.
- Pricing is quoted per agent per month, commonly cited from around 75 US dollars, with analytics and quality sold as separate modules, so the headline figure understates a full suite deployment considerably.
- There is no free trial and no self-service tier, meaning evaluating the forecasting engine against your own historical data requires a sales-led proof of concept measured in weeks.
- The forecasting and scheduling engine assumes an operations team that can configure shift rules, service level targets and skill routing correctly; deployed by a team without that expertise it produces schedules people override manually, which negates the reason to buy it.
Reply.io
- Multichannel features and CRM sync require the higher-priced Professional tier or above.
- LinkedIn and calling/SMS automation are billed as separate per-account add-ons on top of plan pricing.
- Pricing is per user, which can raise costs quickly for larger sales teams.
- Monthly (non-annual) billing carries a notable price premium over the advertised annual rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Calabrio ONE
On request- Calabrio ONE$undefined/year
- Workforce management forecasting and scheduling
- Real-time adherence
- Agent self-service and mobile app
Reply.io
Free- FreeFree
- Limited monthly emails
- Basic sequence features
- Starter$49/month
- Email-only sequences
- Billed annually per user
- Professional$89/month
- Multichannel sequences
- CRM sync
- Billed annually per user
- Ultimate$139/month
- Full AI suite
- Highest sending limits
- Advanced reporting and integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Calabrio ONE if
- You need intelligent forecasting.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want automated scheduling.
Choose Reply.io if
- You need multichannel sequences.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want contact database.
Questions people ask
- Is Calabrio ONE or Reply.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Calabrio ONE starts at On request and Reply.io at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Calabrio ONE or Reply.io?
- Reply.io has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Calabrio ONE and Free for Reply.io.
- Does Calabrio ONE or Reply.io run on more platforms?
- Calabrio ONE runs on Web, iOS, Android. Reply.io runs on web, api.
- Can I use Reply.io for free?
- Yes. Reply.io has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Calabrio ONE starts at On request.
- What is Calabrio ONE best used for?
- Calabrio ONE is most often used for a 1,200-seat contact centre on amazon connect needing forecasting and adherence that the native scheduling tools do not provide, a multi-site operation replacing spreadsheet rostering that no longer copes with skills-based routing and part-time shift patterns, a retailer forecasting seasonal contact volume across voice, chat and email to decide temporary hiring numbers months ahead, a compliance-bound centre needing call and screen recording with retention and redaction controls independent of its telephony vendor. Of those, a 1,200-seat contact centre on amazon connect needing forecasting and adherence that the native scheduling tools do not provide and a multi-site operation replacing spreadsheet rostering that no longer copes with skills-based routing and part-time shift patterns are not what Reply.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Calabrio ONE do that Reply.io cannot?
- Calabrio ONE covers Intelligent forecasting, Automated scheduling, Intraday optimisation, Real-time adherence. Reply.io covers Multichannel sequences, Contact database, AI email assistant, Deliverability tools.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Calabrio ONE: Is Calabrio still a separate product from Verint?
It is still sold and supported under the Calabrio name, but the companies merged under Thoma Bravo ownership in November 2025 and calabrio.com now redirects to verint.com.
Calabrio ONE: Will Calabrio customers be forced to migrate to Verint?
Verint has publicly committed to supporting and enhancing Calabrio solutions with no forced migration. Get that commitment written into your contract term rather than relying on the statement.
Calabrio ONE: Does it replace my contact centre platform?
No. It sits on top of your CCaaS or telephony platform and handles workforce management, recording and quality.
Calabrio ONE: What does it cost?
Nothing is published. Independent reporting puts the entry point near 75 US dollars per agent per month, rising with quality and analytics modules.
Related pages
More on Calabrio ONE
Other head to heads
- Calabrio ONE vs Klaus
- Calabrio ONE vs Playvox
- Calabrio ONE vs Assembled
- Calabrio ONE vs Kapture CX
- Calabrio ONE vs Level AI
- Calabrio ONE vs Ameyo
- Calabrio ONE vs Balto
- Calabrio ONE vs Cresta
- Calabrio ONE vs Alvaria
- Calabrio ONE vs Freshworks Customer Service Suite
- Calabrio ONE vs Zendesk
- Calabrio ONE vs Document360
- Calabrio ONE vs Observe.AI
- Calabrio ONE vs Podium
- Calabrio ONE vs Re:amaze
- Calabrio ONE vs RingCentral Contact Center
- Calabrio ONE vs SupportBee
- Calabrio ONE vs lemlist
- Calabrio ONE vs Woodpecker
- Calabrio ONE vs Snov.io
- Calabrio ONE vs Hunter
- Calabrio ONE vs Outreach
- Calabrio ONE vs Apollo.io
- Calabrio ONE vs Mixmax
- Calabrio ONE vs UpLead
- Calabrio ONE vs Seamless.AI
- Calabrio ONE vs Clari
- Calabrio ONE vs Gong
- Calabrio ONE vs Pipedrive
- Calabrio ONE vs OnePageCRM
- Calabrio ONE vs Ontraport
- Calabrio ONE vs Really Simple Systems
- Calabrio ONE vs Salesflare
- Calabrio ONE vs Scratchpad
- Reply.io vs Klaus
- Reply.io vs Playvox
- Reply.io vs Assembled
- Reply.io vs Kapture CX
- Reply.io vs Level AI
- Reply.io vs Ameyo
- Reply.io vs Balto
- Reply.io vs Cresta
- Reply.io vs Alvaria
- Reply.io vs Freshworks Customer Service Suite
- Reply.io vs Zendesk
- Reply.io vs Document360
- Reply.io vs Observe.AI
- Reply.io vs Podium
- Reply.io vs Re:amaze
- Reply.io vs RingCentral Contact Center
- Reply.io vs SupportBee
- Reply.io vs lemlist
- Reply.io vs Woodpecker
- Reply.io vs Snov.io
- Reply.io vs Hunter
- Reply.io vs Outreach
- Reply.io vs Apollo.io
- Reply.io vs Mixmax
- Reply.io vs UpLead
- Reply.io vs Seamless.AI
- Reply.io vs Clari
- Reply.io vs Gong
- Reply.io vs Pipedrive
- Reply.io vs OnePageCRM
- Reply.io vs Ontraport
- Reply.io vs Really Simple Systems
- Reply.io vs Salesflare
- Reply.io vs Scratchpad
