Softwr

Recruitment · head to head

Bullhorn vs ClearCompany

Bullhorn logo

Bullhorn

Recruitment

Applicant tracking and CRM for staffing and recruitment agencies, including contract placement, timesheets and pay-bill

From
On request
Rated
-
ClearCompany logo

ClearCompany

Recruitment

Talent management platform unifying hiring, onboarding, performance, and learning

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bullhorn pricing is per user on annual contracts with minimum seat counts, so agencies with seasonal consultants pay for licences that sit idle for months.; ClearCompany no pricing is published anywhere on the site; every plan requires a demo or sales request to get a quote.
  • They diverge on capability: Bullhorn covers Recruitment CRM, ClearCompany covers Applicant tracking & recruiting.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bullhorn and ClearCompany actually diverge.

Attributes where Bullhorn and ClearCompany differ
AttributeBullhornClearCompany
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Androidweb, api

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Recruitment).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bullhorn

  • Recruitment CRM
  • Applicant tracking
  • Pay and bill
  • Bullhorn Automation
  • Analytics
  • Executive search
  • Salesforce edition

Only in ClearCompany

  • Applicant tracking & recruiting
  • Performance management
  • Learning management
  • Compensation management
  • People analytics
  • Talent AI
  • HR system integrations

Both cover

  • Onboarding

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bullhorn

  • A contract staffing agency that needs worked hours to become both a worker payment and a client invoice against one placement recordnot ClearCompany
  • A recruitment firm where consultants sell to clients and manage candidates in the same working daynot ClearCompany
  • An agency consolidating several acquired offices onto one system of recordnot ClearCompany
  • An executive search practice needing assignment-based workflow rather than requisition-based trackingnot ClearCompany

ClearCompany

  • Mid-to-large organizations consolidating hiring and talent management in one platformnot Bullhorn
  • HR teams wanting recruiting insights connected to onboarding and performance datanot Bullhorn
  • Companies building structured learning and compensation programs alongside hiringnot Bullhorn
  • Organizations needing workforce analytics across the full employee lifecyclenot Bullhorn

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bullhorn

  • Pricing is per user on annual contracts with minimum seat counts, so agencies with seasonal consultants pay for licences that sit idle for months.
  • The product estate has been assembled through a decade of acquisitions, which leaves overlapping modules, inconsistent interfaces and more than one supported way to do the same task.
  • Implementation and data migration are multi-month projects requiring paid services, and agencies moving from another system routinely underestimate the effort of cleaning candidate and client records first.
  • The interface is dated relative to newer recruitment tools, and consultants coming from consumer-grade software need real training rather than picking it up unaided.
  • It is built for agency economics and is a poor fit for corporate in-house hiring, where the client and margin concepts are meaningless and the licence cost buys capability that will never be used.

ClearCompany

  • No pricing is published anywhere on the site; every plan requires a demo or sales request to get a quote.
  • There is no self-serve free trial, unlike lighter-weight ATS competitors aimed at smaller teams.
  • The breadth of modules (ClearRecruit, ClearTalent, ClearGrow, ClearLearn, TotalTalent) makes it harder to evaluate which package fits a smaller team's needs without sales involvement.

Pricing, plan by plan

Bullhorn

On request
  • Bullhorn ATS and CRM$undefined/year
    • Priced per user per month on an annual contract
    • Minimum user counts apply
    • Implementation and data migration quoted separately

ClearCompany

On request
  • ClearRecruit$undefined/mo
    • Candidate attraction
    • Recruiting experience
    • Background checks
  • ClearTalent$undefined/mo
    • Onboarding
    • Goals & alignment
    • Learning management
  • ClearGrow$undefined/mo
    • Performance management
    • Employee management
    • Learning management
  • ClearLearn$undefined/mo
    • Learning management focus

Which should you pick?

Choose Bullhorn if

  • You need recruitment crm.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want applicant tracking.

Choose ClearCompany if

  • You need applicant tracking & recruiting.
  • You work on web, api.
  • You also want performance management.

Questions people ask

Is Bullhorn or ClearCompany better?
Neither clearly leads. Bullhorn starts at On request and ClearCompany at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bullhorn or ClearCompany?
Bullhorn starts at On request and ClearCompany at On request.
Does Bullhorn or ClearCompany run on more platforms?
Bullhorn runs on Web, iOS, Android. ClearCompany runs on web, api.
What is Bullhorn best used for?
Bullhorn is most often used for a contract staffing agency that needs worked hours to become both a worker payment and a client invoice against one placement record, a recruitment firm where consultants sell to clients and manage candidates in the same working day, an agency consolidating several acquired offices onto one system of record, an executive search practice needing assignment-based workflow rather than requisition-based tracking. Of those, a contract staffing agency that needs worked hours to become both a worker payment and a client invoice against one placement record and a recruitment firm where consultants sell to clients and manage candidates in the same working day are not what ClearCompany is typically brought in for.
What can Bullhorn do that ClearCompany cannot?
Bullhorn covers Recruitment CRM, Applicant tracking, Pay and bill, Bullhorn Automation. ClearCompany covers Applicant tracking & recruiting, Performance management, Learning management, Compensation management. Both handle Onboarding.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Bullhorn: Is Bullhorn suitable for in-house corporate recruiting?

No. It is built around client relationships, margins and placements. Corporate teams should buy a requisition-based ATS instead.

ClearCompany: What does ClearCompany cost?

ClearCompany does not publish pricing. It offers packages like ClearRecruit, ClearTalent, ClearGrow, ClearLearn, and TotalTalent, and visitors must book a demo or request pricing to get a quote.

Source
Bullhorn: Who owns Bullhorn?

Insight Partners has held a majority stake since 2012, and the company has grown substantially through acquisition since then.

ClearCompany: Is there a free plan or trial?

No free trial information is provided on ClearCompany's pricing page; the company routes all pricing inquiries through a demo request.

Source
Bullhorn: Does it handle temporary worker payroll?

It captures time, calculates pay and bill rates and produces payroll and invoicing outputs. Actual payroll processing is done by a payroll provider it exports to.

ClearCompany: What does ClearCompany integrate with?

ClearCompany connects with existing HR systems as part of its shared platform foundation, aiming to eliminate data silos between recruiting, performance, and learning tools.

Source
Bullhorn: What does implementation involve?

Data migration, workflow configuration and training, typically several months for an established agency, with services charged on top of the licence.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads