APIs · head to head
Bruno vs Increase

Bruno
APIs
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Increase
APIs
Direct banking API for ACH, wires, real-time payments, accounts and cards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Bruno has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; Increase the published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.
- They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, Increase covers ACH origination and receipt.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bruno and Increase actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- GitHub
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
Only in Increase
- ACH origination and receipt
- Domestic wires
- Real-time payments
- Bank accounts
- Cards
- Cheques
- Sandbox and simulations
- Audit and reconciliation data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot Increase
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot Increase
- Offline API development without an accountnot Increase
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot Increase
Increase
- A payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ACH and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processornot Bruno
- A marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbersnot Bruno
- A fintech that wants FedNow and RTP payouts so recipients are paid outside banking hoursnot Bruno
- An engineering team that needs the underlying return codes and settlement timing visible in order to build correct reconciliation and retry logicnot Bruno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
Increase
- The published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.
- Free allowances are deliberately small at ten account numbers and five physical cards, so any programme issuing accounts or cards at volume moves to quoted pricing almost immediately.
- Banking is provided through partner banks, so programme approval, compliance obligations and the ability to launch at all depend on a bank relationship you do not control, and post-Synapse bank risk appetite has tightened considerably.
- The API deliberately exposes payment rail mechanics rather than smoothing them, which is correct engineering but means a team without payments expertise will build reconciliation and return handling wrongly and only discover it when funds go astray.
- Coverage is United States only, so a company with international payout needs runs a second provider and reconciles two ledgers, and the single API argument disappears at the first cross border customer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core API Client
- Limited Git integration
- 2 Workspaces
- Pro$6/month
- Core API Client
- Native Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
- Ultimate$11/month
- Core API Client
- Full Git integration
- Unlimited Workspaces
Increase
On request- Increase Platform$undefined/month
- Monthly fee quoted by use case and not published
- Next-day ACH origination listed at 0.50 US dollars per transaction
- Same-day ACH origination listed at 2.00 per transaction
Which should you pick?
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Choose Increase if
- You need ach origination and receipt.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want domestic wires.
Questions people ask
- Is Bruno or Increase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and Increase at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bruno or Increase?
- Bruno has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Bruno and On request for Increase.
- Does Bruno or Increase run on more platforms?
- Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. Increase runs on API, Web.
- Can I use Bruno for free?
- Yes. Bruno has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Increase starts at On request.
- What is Bruno best used for?
- Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what Increase is typically brought in for.
- What can Bruno do that Increase cannot?
- Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub. Increase covers ACH origination and receipt, Domestic wires, Real-time payments, Bank accounts.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bruno: What is included in Bruno's free tier?
The Open Source plan includes the core API client, limited Git integration, and up to 2 workspaces at no cost. A 14-day free trial of the Ultimate plan is also available without requiring a credit card.
SourceIncrease: Does Increase publish its pricing?
Partly. Per transaction fees for ACH, wires, RTP, FedNow and cards are listed publicly. The monthly platform fee is not, and it is described only as varying by use case.
Bruno: What is the difference between Bruno Pro and Ultimate plans?
Pro ($6/month) includes native Git integration and unlimited workspaces. Ultimate ($11/month) adds SSO/SCIM support, audit logs, 24-hour support (vs. 48-hour), and an account manager. Ultimate supports unlimited OpenAPI syncs while Pro is limited to 5 per month.
SourceIncrease: Who holds the deposits?
Partner banks, not Increase itself. That relationship determines your programme approval, your compliance obligations and your risk if the bank changes appetite.
Bruno: How much does Bruno Pro save compared to other API tools?
The vendor claims Ultimate saves teams more than 70% versus Postman, though this comparison is promotional rather than a specific cost metric.
SourceIncrease: Is it international?
No. Increase covers United States rails only, so cross border payouts require a second provider.
Increase: How is it different from a middleware BaaS platform?
It exposes the rails rather than abstracting them, showing real return codes and settlement timing. That suits teams who understand payments and punishes teams who do not.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs REST Client VSCode
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs Apidog
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Hoppscotch
- Bruno vs HTTPie
- Bruno vs Kong
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs Tyk
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Basis Theory
- Bruno vs Boomi API Management
- Bruno vs Codat
- Bruno vs Kong Gateway
- Bruno vs Dwolla
- Bruno vs Astra
- Bruno vs Unit
- Bruno vs Treasury Prime
- Bruno vs Sila
- Bruno vs Moov
- Bruno vs Column
- Bruno vs Lithic
- Bruno vs Volt
- Bruno vs Swan
- Bruno vs TrueLayer
- Bruno vs Griffin
- Bruno vs KeystoneJS
- Bruno vs Liveblocks
- Bruno vs Moesif
- Bruno vs Ozone API
- Bruno vs Parse Server
- Increase vs PocketBase
- Increase vs REST Client VSCode
- Increase vs Appwrite
- Increase vs Hasura
- Increase vs Apidog
- Increase vs Sanity
- Increase vs Hoppscotch
- Increase vs HTTPie
- Increase vs Kong
- Increase vs Thunder Client
- Increase vs Tyk
- Increase vs Asyncapi
- Increase vs AWS API Gateway
- Increase vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Increase vs Basis Theory
- Increase vs Boomi API Management
- Increase vs Codat
- Increase vs Kong Gateway
- Increase vs Dwolla
- Increase vs Astra
- Increase vs Unit
- Increase vs Treasury Prime
- Increase vs Sila
- Increase vs Moov
- Increase vs Column
- Increase vs Lithic
- Increase vs Volt
- Increase vs Swan
- Increase vs TrueLayer
- Increase vs Griffin
- Increase vs KeystoneJS
- Increase vs Liveblocks
- Increase vs Moesif
- Increase vs Ozone API
- Increase vs Parse Server
