Softwr

Software · head to head

Bruno vs GraphQL Playground

Bruno logo

Bruno

Software

Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections

From
Free
Rated
-
GraphQL Playground logo

GraphQL Playground

Software

GraphQL IDE and documentation tool for building GraphQL APIs

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; GraphQL Playground apollo's own documentation states GraphQL Playground is officially retired and no longer recommended, directing users to Apollo Sandbox instead
  • They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, GraphQL Playground covers Query building.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Bruno and GraphQL Playground actually diverge.

Attributes where Bruno and GraphQL Playground differ
AttributeBrunoGraphQL Playground
PlatformsWindows, MacOS, LinuxWeb, Electron, Self-hosted
Founded20222018

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Bruno

  • API Testing
  • Environment management
  • Git-friendly storage
  • GitHub
  • Git repositories
  • Local file system
  • Windows support
  • MacOS support

Only in GraphQL Playground

  • Query building
  • Schema introspection
  • Real-time testing
  • GraphQL servers
  • Apollo Studio
  • Custom servers
  • Web support
  • Electron support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Bruno

  • Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot GraphQL Playground
  • Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot GraphQL Playground
  • Offline API development without an accountnot GraphQL Playground
  • Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot GraphQL Playground

GraphQL Playground

  • API Developmentnot Bruno
  • API Gatewaynot Bruno
  • API Testingnot Bruno
  • API Documentationnot Bruno
  • Microservicesnot Bruno

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Bruno

  • Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
  • OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
  • SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
  • Private workspaces are a paid feature
  • Advertised prices are annual rates

GraphQL Playground

  • Apollo's own documentation states GraphQL Playground is officially retired and no longer recommended, directing users to Apollo Sandbox instead

Pricing, plan by plan

Bruno

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full IDE features
    • Git integration
    • Local storage

GraphQL Playground

Free
  • Open SourceFree
    • Full GraphQL IDE
    • Community support

Which should you pick?

Choose Bruno if

  • You need api testing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
  • You also want environment management.

Choose GraphQL Playground if

  • You need query building.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Electron, Self-hosted.
  • You also want schema introspection.

Questions people ask

Is Bruno or GraphQL Playground better?
Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and GraphQL Playground at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Bruno or GraphQL Playground?
Bruno starts at Free and GraphQL Playground at Free.
Does Bruno or GraphQL Playground run on more platforms?
Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. GraphQL Playground runs on Web, Electron, Self-hosted.
Can I use Bruno for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Bruno best used for?
Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what GraphQL Playground is typically brought in for.
What can Bruno do that GraphQL Playground cannot?
Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub. GraphQL Playground covers Query building, Schema introspection, Real-time testing, GraphQL servers.

Related pages

Other head to heads