Software · head to head
Bruno vs GraphQL Apollo

Bruno
Software
Open-source IDE for API exploration with git-friendly collections
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bruno native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month; GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat
- They diverge on capability: Bruno covers API Testing, GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bruno and GraphQL Apollo actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bruno | GraphQL Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, MacOS, Linux | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bruno
- API Testing
- Environment management
- Git-friendly storage
- GitHub
- Git repositories
- Local file system
- Windows support
- MacOS support
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bruno
- Sending and testing HTTP requests from a local clientnot GraphQL Apollo
- Keeping API collections in Git rather than a vendor cloudnot GraphQL Apollo
- Offline API development without an accountnot GraphQL Apollo
- Importing and syncing OpenAPI specificationsnot GraphQL Apollo
GraphQL Apollo
- API Developmentnot Bruno
- API Gatewaynot Bruno
- API Testingnot Bruno
- API Documentationnot Bruno
- Microservicesnot Bruno
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bruno
- Native Git integration, the feature that distinguishes it from cloud API clients, is Pro only at $6 per user per month
- OpenAPI syncs are capped at 5 a month on the free tier
- SSO, SCIM and user management require Ultimate at $11 per user per month
- Private workspaces are a paid feature
- Advertised prices are annual rates
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise tiers publish no figures and require contacting sales through a Talk to Sales link, while paid usage is metered at $5 per million requests rather than by seat
- Developer plan caps at 10 users and Standard caps at 30 users before requiring the sales-gated Enterprise tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Bruno
Free- Open SourceFree
- Full IDE features
- Git integration
- Local storage
GraphQL Apollo
Free- CommunityFree
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- Community support
- Studio Starter$49/monthly
- Apollo Studio
- GraphQL monitoring
- Collaboration
- Studio Professional$399/monthly
- Advanced analytics
- Priority support
- SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Bruno if
- You need api testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want environment management.
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Questions people ask
- Is Bruno or GraphQL Apollo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bruno starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bruno or GraphQL Apollo?
- Bruno starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free.
- Does Bruno or GraphQL Apollo run on more platforms?
- Bruno runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- Can I use Bruno for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Bruno best used for?
- Bruno is most often used for sending and testing http requests from a local client, keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud, offline api development without an account, importing and syncing openapi specifications. Of those, sending and testing http requests from a local client and keeping api collections in git rather than a vendor cloud are not what GraphQL Apollo is typically brought in for.
- What can Bruno do that GraphQL Apollo cannot?
- Bruno covers API Testing, Environment management, Git-friendly storage, GitHub. GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Bruno vs Appwrite
- Bruno vs Hasura
- Bruno vs PocketBase
- Bruno vs Sanity
- Bruno vs Apigee
- Bruno vs KeystoneJS
- Bruno vs Parse Server
- Bruno vs Stoplight
- Bruno vs Strapi
- Bruno vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Bruno vs Thunder Client
- Bruno vs WSO2 API Manager
- Bruno vs 3scale
- Bruno vs Akana
- Bruno vs Asyncapi
- Bruno vs AWS API Gateway
- Bruno vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Bruno vs Backendless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Apigee
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stoplight
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs 3scale
- GraphQL Apollo vs Akana
- GraphQL Apollo vs Asyncapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs AWS API Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- GraphQL Apollo vs Backendless

