APIs · head to head
Increase vs Thunder Client

Increase
APIs
Direct banking API for ACH, wires, real-time payments, accounts and cards
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Thunder Client
APIs
Lightweight REST API client built as VSCode extension
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Thunder Client has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Increase the published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.; Thunder Client paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
- They diverge on capability: Increase covers ACH origination and receipt, Thunder Client covers REST Client.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Increase and Thunder Client actually diverge.
| Attribute | Increase | Thunder Client |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | API, Web | VSCode extension, Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 2021 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Increase
- ACH origination and receipt
- Domestic wires
- Real-time payments
- Bank accounts
- Cards
- Cheques
- Sandbox and simulations
- Audit and reconciliation data
Only in Thunder Client
- REST Client
- Environment variables
- Response testing
- VSCode
- GitHub
- Webhook support
- VSCode extension support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Increase
- A payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ACH and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processornot Thunder Client
- A marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbersnot Thunder Client
- A fintech that wants FedNow and RTP payouts so recipients are paid outside banking hoursnot Thunder Client
- An engineering team that needs the underlying return codes and settlement timing visible in order to build correct reconciliation and retry logicnot Thunder Client
Thunder Client
- API Developmentnot Increase
- API Gatewaynot Increase
- API Testingnot Increase
- API Documentationnot Increase
- Microservicesnot Increase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Increase
- The published per transaction rates exclude a monthly platform fee that Increase states varies by use case, so the transparent price page cannot produce a total cost and the material part of the deal is still negotiated privately.
- Free allowances are deliberately small at ten account numbers and five physical cards, so any programme issuing accounts or cards at volume moves to quoted pricing almost immediately.
- Banking is provided through partner banks, so programme approval, compliance obligations and the ability to launch at all depend on a bank relationship you do not control, and post-Synapse bank risk appetite has tightened considerably.
- The API deliberately exposes payment rail mechanics rather than smoothing them, which is correct engineering but means a team without payments expertise will build reconciliation and return handling wrongly and only discover it when funds go astray.
- Coverage is United States only, so a company with international payout needs runs a second provider and reconciles two ledgers, and the single API argument disappears at the first cross border customer.
Thunder Client
- Paid plans are billed annually only: Starter is $3 per user per month and capped at a maximum of 10 seats, Business is $7 per user per month with 500 monthly collection runs per user, and Enterprise is $16 per user per month for unlimited runs
Pricing, plan by plan
Increase
On request- Increase Platform$undefined/month
- Monthly fee quoted by use case and not published
- Next-day ACH origination listed at 0.50 US dollars per transaction
- Same-day ACH origination listed at 2.00 per transaction
Thunder Client
Free- FreeFree
- REST client
- Collection management
- Local testing
- Pro$8/monthly
- Cloud sync
- Team collaboration
- Advanced features
Which should you pick?
Choose Increase if
- You need ach origination and receipt.
- You work on API, Web.
- You also want domestic wires.
Choose Thunder Client if
- You need rest client.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on VSCode extension, Web.
- You also want environment variables.
Questions people ask
- Is Increase or Thunder Client better?
- Neither clearly leads. Increase starts at On request and Thunder Client at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Increase or Thunder Client?
- Thunder Client has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Increase and Free for Thunder Client.
- Does Increase or Thunder Client run on more platforms?
- Increase runs on API, Web. Thunder Client runs on VSCode extension, Web.
- Can I use Thunder Client for free?
- Yes. Thunder Client has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Increase starts at On request.
- What is Increase best used for?
- Increase is most often used for a payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ach and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processor, a marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbers, a fintech that wants fednow and rtp payouts so recipients are paid outside banking hours, an engineering team that needs the underlying return codes and settlement timing visible in order to build correct reconciliation and retry logic. Of those, a payroll or treasury product that needs to originate same-day ach and wires under its own control rather than through a payment processor and a marketplace that must hold seller balances in ledgered accounts with real account and routing numbers are not what Thunder Client is typically brought in for.
- What can Increase do that Thunder Client cannot?
- Increase covers ACH origination and receipt, Domestic wires, Real-time payments, Bank accounts. Thunder Client covers REST Client, Environment variables, Response testing, VSCode.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Increase: Does Increase publish its pricing?
Partly. Per transaction fees for ACH, wires, RTP, FedNow and cards are listed publicly. The monthly platform fee is not, and it is described only as varying by use case.
Thunder Client: How much does Thunder Client cost?
Thunder Client publishes a free plan at no cost, then Starter at $3, Business at $7 and Enterprise at $16, all priced annually.
SourceIncrease: Who holds the deposits?
Partner banks, not Increase itself. That relationship determines your programme approval, your compliance obligations and your risk if the bank changes appetite.
Thunder Client: Is Thunder Client free?
Yes, there is a free plan. It is used through the Thunder Client extension for VS Code, available from the marketplace, with limits applied compared with the paid tiers.
SourceIncrease: Is it international?
No. Increase covers United States rails only, so cross border payouts require a second provider.
Increase: How is it different from a middleware BaaS platform?
It exposes the rails rather than abstracting them, showing real return codes and settlement timing. That suits teams who understand payments and punishes teams who do not.
Related pages
More on Thunder Client
Other head to heads
- Increase vs Dwolla
- Increase vs Astra
- Increase vs Unit
- Increase vs Treasury Prime
- Increase vs Sila
- Increase vs Moov
- Increase vs Column
- Increase vs Lithic
- Increase vs Volt
- Increase vs Swan
- Increase vs TrueLayer
- Increase vs Griffin
- Increase vs KeystoneJS
- Increase vs Kong
- Increase vs Liveblocks
- Increase vs Moesif
- Increase vs Ozone API
- Increase vs Parse Server
- Increase vs REST Client VSCode
- Increase vs PocketBase
- Increase vs Appwrite
- Increase vs Hasura
- Increase vs Sanity
- Increase vs Bruno
- Increase vs Paw
- Increase vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Increase vs HTTPie
- Increase vs Prisma
- Increase vs RapidAPI
- Increase vs 10x Banking
- Increase vs Brite Payments
- Increase vs Bud Financial
- Increase vs Episode Six
- Increase vs Kong Gateway
- Increase vs Swagger
- Thunder Client vs Dwolla
- Thunder Client vs Astra
- Thunder Client vs Unit
- Thunder Client vs Treasury Prime
- Thunder Client vs Sila
- Thunder Client vs Moov
- Thunder Client vs Column
- Thunder Client vs Lithic
- Thunder Client vs Volt
- Thunder Client vs Swan
- Thunder Client vs TrueLayer
- Thunder Client vs Griffin
- Thunder Client vs KeystoneJS
- Thunder Client vs Kong
- Thunder Client vs Liveblocks
- Thunder Client vs Moesif
- Thunder Client vs Ozone API
- Thunder Client vs Parse Server
- Thunder Client vs REST Client VSCode
- Thunder Client vs PocketBase
- Thunder Client vs Appwrite
- Thunder Client vs Hasura
- Thunder Client vs Sanity
- Thunder Client vs Bruno
- Thunder Client vs Paw
- Thunder Client vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Thunder Client vs HTTPie
- Thunder Client vs Prisma
- Thunder Client vs RapidAPI
- Thunder Client vs 10x Banking
- Thunder Client vs Brite Payments
- Thunder Client vs Bud Financial
- Thunder Client vs Episode Six
- Thunder Client vs Kong Gateway
- Thunder Client vs Swagger
