Government · head to head
Bonfire vs Silent Eight

Bonfire
Government
Public sector sourcing and bid evaluation software with scored, auditable award decisions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Silent Eight
Cybersecurity
AI adjudication of sanctions screening and AML alerts
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bonfire it is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.; Silent Eight automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- They diverge on capability: Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bonfire and Silent Eight actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bonfire | Silent Eight |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bonfire
- Solicitation posting
- Sealed submission intake
- Scored evaluation workspace
- Audit trail
- Supplier portal
- Requirement matrices
Only in Silent Eight
- Alert adjudication
- Narrative generation
- Name screening automation
- Quality assurance
- Shadow mode
- Model transparency reporting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bonfire
- An agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation recordnot Silent Eight
- A procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and emailnot Silent Eight
- A university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement systemnot Silent Eight
- An agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing listnot Silent Eight
Silent Eight
- A bank whose level one screening team spends most of its time closing obvious false name matchesnot Bonfire
- A payments institution with alert volumes growing faster than it can recruit and train analystsnot Bonfire
- A compliance function asked by a regulator to demonstrate consistency of alert decisions across offshore teamsnot Bonfire
- An institution that has just tightened screening thresholds after an enforcement action and cannot staff the resulting alert increasenot Bonfire
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bonfire
- It is a sourcing and evaluation tool rather than full procure to pay, so requisitions, purchase orders and invoicing stay in the finance system and the join between them is the agency's problem.
- Since the acquisition path from GTY to GI Partners to Euna Solutions, Bonfire sits in a portfolio alongside products it once competed with, which narrows a shortlist that appears independent.
- Suppliers must register on the portal to bid, and small local vendors reliably complain about the extra account, which can reduce responses on low value solicitations.
- Pricing is quoted rather than published and scales with solicitation volume, so an agency with a few very large procurements pays a model designed around throughput.
- Contract management after award is thin compared with dedicated contract lifecycle products, so agencies often buy a second system for the obligations the award created.
Silent Eight
- Automated disposition has to clear model risk governance and a regulator, and the shadow running period before auto-close is permitted can consume most of the first year of the contract.
- It does not improve detection, so an institution with a poorly tuned monitoring system automates the handling of bad alerts rather than fixing why they exist.
- Pricing is tied to alert volume, which means efficiency gains elsewhere that reduce alerts also reduce the vendor bill in a way sales teams structure minimums against.
- The headcount saving is only realised if the institution actually reduces the analyst pool, and many banks redeploy rather than cut, leaving the business case unrealised on paper.
- As a mid-sized private vendor serving tier one banks, concentration risk cuts both ways; the loss of one large client materially affects the company, and buyers should ask about financial stability during diligence.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bonfire
On request- Bonfire$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and annual solicitation volume
- Supplier side registration is free, which is how the vendor network grows
- Implementation and training quoted separately from subscription
Silent Eight
On request- Iris$undefined/year
- Priced by alert volume adjudicated
- Deploys against existing screening and monitoring systems
- Shadow mode evaluation period
Which should you pick?
Choose Bonfire if
- You need solicitation posting.
- You also want sealed submission intake.
Choose Silent Eight if
- You need alert adjudication.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want narrative generation.
Questions people ask
- Is Bonfire or Silent Eight better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bonfire starts at On request and Silent Eight at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bonfire or Silent Eight?
- Bonfire starts at On request and Silent Eight at On request.
- Does Bonfire or Silent Eight run on more platforms?
- Bonfire runs on Web. Silent Eight runs on Web, Linux.
- What is Bonfire best used for?
- Bonfire is most often used for an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record, a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email, a university or health system applying public procurement rules without a public procurement system, an agency wanting suppliers to self register and receive addenda automatically rather than by mailing list. Of those, an agency that has lost or nearly lost a bid protest and needs a defensible evaluation record and a procurement team running scoring committees currently held together by spreadsheets and email are not what Silent Eight is typically brought in for.
- What can Bonfire do that Silent Eight cannot?
- Bonfire covers Solicitation posting, Sealed submission intake, Scored evaluation workspace, Audit trail. Silent Eight covers Alert adjudication, Narrative generation, Name screening automation, Quality assurance.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bonfire: Who owns Bonfire?
Euna Solutions. Bonfire was acquired by GTY Technology in 2019, GTY was taken private by GI Partners in 2022, and the portfolio was rebranded Euna Solutions in 2023.
Silent Eight: Does Silent Eight replace our screening system?
No. It consumes alerts from your existing screening and monitoring systems and decides them. The detection layer stays where it is.
Bonfire: Is it full procure to pay?
No. It covers sourcing and evaluation through award. Purchase orders and invoicing remain in the finance system.
Silent Eight: Will a regulator accept AI closing alerts?
It depends on your jurisdiction and your model governance evidence. Banks typically run extended shadow mode first and phase auto-closure by alert type.
Bonfire: What is the real value?
A defensible, time stamped evaluation record when an award is protested, which is the expensive failure mode in public procurement.
Silent Eight: Where is the company based?
Singapore, with offices in New York, London and Warsaw.
Bonfire: Can we see what other agencies pay?
Yes. These contracts are public records. Read several comparable awards before negotiating.
Related pages
More on Silent Eight
Other head to heads
- Bonfire vs Bidnet Direct
- Bonfire vs Periscope Holdings
- Bonfire vs NEOGOV
- Bonfire vs ArchiveSocial
- Bonfire vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Bonfire vs mySidewalk
- Bonfire vs SAP for Government
- Bonfire vs Clariti
- Bonfire vs GovPilot
- Bonfire vs Zencity
- Bonfire vs Tyler Technologies
- Bonfire vs Polco
- Bonfire vs SafeCity
- Bonfire vs SeeClickFix
- Bonfire vs ShotSpotter
- Bonfire vs Springbrook Software
- Bonfire vs Rock Solid
- Bonfire vs NICE Actimize
- Bonfire vs Quantexa
- Bonfire vs ThetaRay
- Bonfire vs Feedzai
- Bonfire vs Jumio
- Bonfire vs Sumsub
- Bonfire vs iDenfy
- Bonfire vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Bonfire vs Sardine
- Bonfire vs Camio
- Bonfire vs Unit21
- Bonfire vs Shufti Pro
- Bonfire vs NordPass
- Bonfire vs One Identity
- Bonfire vs Ory Kratos
- Bonfire vs OWASP ZAP
- Bonfire vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Bonfire vs Passbolt
- Silent Eight vs Bidnet Direct
- Silent Eight vs Periscope Holdings
- Silent Eight vs NEOGOV
- Silent Eight vs ArchiveSocial
- Silent Eight vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Silent Eight vs mySidewalk
- Silent Eight vs SAP for Government
- Silent Eight vs Clariti
- Silent Eight vs GovPilot
- Silent Eight vs Zencity
- Silent Eight vs Tyler Technologies
- Silent Eight vs Polco
- Silent Eight vs SafeCity
- Silent Eight vs SeeClickFix
- Silent Eight vs ShotSpotter
- Silent Eight vs Springbrook Software
- Silent Eight vs Rock Solid
- Silent Eight vs NICE Actimize
- Silent Eight vs Quantexa
- Silent Eight vs ThetaRay
- Silent Eight vs Feedzai
- Silent Eight vs Jumio
- Silent Eight vs Sumsub
- Silent Eight vs iDenfy
- Silent Eight vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Silent Eight vs Sardine
- Silent Eight vs Camio
- Silent Eight vs Unit21
- Silent Eight vs Shufti Pro
- Silent Eight vs NordPass
- Silent Eight vs One Identity
- Silent Eight vs Ory Kratos
- Silent Eight vs OWASP ZAP
- Silent Eight vs Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
- Silent Eight vs Passbolt
