Developer Tools · head to head
Blacksmith vs Logto

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Logto
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity and authentication infrastructure for apps and APIs
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs; Logto advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.
- They diverge on capability: Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Blacksmith and Logto actually diverge.
| Attribute | Blacksmith | Logto |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS | web, api |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
Only in Logto
- Prebuilt sign-in UI
- Social connectors
- Role-based access control
- Multi-factor authentication
- Machine-to-machine apps
- Audit logs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Logto
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Logto
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Logto
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Logto
Logto
- Adding sign-in to a new SaaS productnot Blacksmith
- Implementing SSO for B2B customersnot Blacksmith
- Securing internal APIs with M2M tokensnot Blacksmith
- Adding RBAC and organizations to a multi-tenant appnot Blacksmith
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Logto
- Advanced features like RBAC, organizations, MFA, and enterprise SSO are billed as separate paid add-ons rather than included in Pro.
- Enterprise pricing is not published and requires contacting sales.
- Token-based billing can make cost forecasting harder than flat per-MAU pricing for high-traffic apps.
Pricing, plan by plan
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Logto
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 50,000 MAU
- 50K tokens included
- 3 applications
- Pro$24/month
- Unlimited MAU and applications
- 3 included API resources
- Passkey sign-in
Which should you pick?
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Choose Logto if
- You need prebuilt sign-in ui.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want social connectors.
Questions people ask
- Is Blacksmith or Logto better?
- Neither clearly leads. Blacksmith starts at Free and Logto at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Blacksmith or Logto?
- Blacksmith starts at Free and Logto at Free.
- Does Blacksmith or Logto run on more platforms?
- Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS. Logto runs on web, api.
- Can I use Blacksmith for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Blacksmith best used for?
- Blacksmith is most often used for replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure, accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load, reducing cloud spend on github actions by 60% or more, supporting arm architecture builds without github runners. Of those, replacing github actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructure and accelerating ci build times for organizations with heavy ci load are not what Logto is typically brought in for.
- What can Blacksmith do that Logto cannot?
- Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching. Logto covers Prebuilt sign-in UI, Social connectors, Role-based access control, Multi-factor authentication.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceLogto: What does Logto cost?
Logto offers a Free plan at $0/month, a Pro plan starting at $24/month with 50K free tokens included, and a custom-priced Enterprise plan. Extra add-ons like RBAC or MFA are billed separately on Pro.
SourceBlacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceLogto: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Yes. The Free plan supports up to 50,000 monthly active users, 3 total applications, 1 machine-to-machine app, 3 social connectors, 1 webhook, and 3-day audit log retention.
SourceBlacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceLogto: How is usage metered?
Logto uses token-based billing: only access tokens issued for authentication and authorization activity are counted, rather than charging purely per MAU.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs Ory
- Blacksmith vs authentik
- Blacksmith vs Authelia
- Blacksmith vs Clerk
- Blacksmith vs 1Password
- Blacksmith vs Frontegg
- Blacksmith vs Sigstore
- Blacksmith vs Infisical
- Blacksmith vs OWASP ZAP
- Blacksmith vs Bitwarden
- Blacksmith vs Semgrep
- Blacksmith vs Veriff
- Blacksmith vs Brave Browser
- Blacksmith vs March Networks
- Blacksmith vs Salient CompleteView
- Blacksmith vs Sumsub
- Blacksmith vs Tuta
- Blacksmith vs Ory Kratos
- Logto vs WarpBuild
- Logto vs Depot
- Logto vs Namespace
- Logto vs Earthly
- Logto vs Nx Cloud
- Logto vs OpsLevel
- Logto vs Garden
- Logto vs ConfigCat
- Logto vs Dagger
- Logto vs Nix
- Logto vs Rust
- Logto vs Ansible
- Logto vs PartyKit
- Logto vs PhpStorm
- Logto vs Pieces for Developers
- Logto vs RAD Studio
- Logto vs Refact
- Logto vs Ory
- Logto vs authentik
- Logto vs Authelia
- Logto vs Clerk
- Logto vs 1Password
- Logto vs Frontegg
- Logto vs Sigstore
- Logto vs Infisical
- Logto vs OWASP ZAP
- Logto vs Bitwarden
- Logto vs Semgrep
- Logto vs Veriff
- Logto vs Brave Browser
- Logto vs March Networks
- Logto vs Salient CompleteView
- Logto vs Sumsub
- Logto vs Tuta
- Logto vs Ory Kratos
