Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs OpsLevel

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No

OpsLevel
Developer Tools
Internal developer portal that scores service ownership and production readiness
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; OpsLevel opsLevel does not publish prices at all, not even a starting figure, so you cannot size a budget or compare against Backstage's zero licence cost without entering a sales cycle.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, OpsLevel covers Service catalogue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and OpsLevel actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | OpsLevel |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | Web |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in OpsLevel
- Service catalogue
- Scorecards and rubric
- Checks
- Campaigns
- Self-service actions
- Slack and Teams integration
- Catalogue auto-enrichment
- Deployment on request
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot OpsLevel
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot OpsLevel
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot OpsLevel
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot OpsLevel
OpsLevel
- A platform team that needs to prove every production service has a named owner and an on-call rota before an auditnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Driving a fleet-wide migration such as a runtime upgrade across 400 services with a deadline and visible progressnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Giving developers a paved road to create a new service from a template without waiting on the platform teamnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- An organisation where an incident took an hour to route because nobody could identify the owning teamnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
OpsLevel
- OpsLevel does not publish prices at all, not even a starting figure, so you cannot size a budget or compare against Backstage's zero licence cost without entering a sales cycle.
- The Standard plan caps at 50 users, which is below the size at which service ownership becomes a real problem, so most genuine buyers land on Enterprise and its unpublished pricing.
- Scores are only as honest as the metadata teams maintain; where ownership records go stale the rubric produces confident numbers about a catalogue that no longer reflects reality, and leadership acts on them.
- It reports on quality rather than producing it, so it can generate friction between platform teams who set the rubric and product teams who see it as a scoreboard imposed on them without extra headcount to fix the findings.
- As a hosted product it needs read access to source control, cloud accounts and observability tooling, which is a meaningful vendor review in regulated environments; on-premises exists but only on the Enterprise tier.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
OpsLevel
On request- Standard$undefined/year
- Up to 50 users
- Unlimited catalogued components
- Scorecards, campaigns and the global rubric
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Unlimited users
- Custom integrations
- Customisable dashboards
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or OpsLevel better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and OpsLevel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or OpsLevel?
- Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and OpsLevel at On request.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or OpsLevel run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. OpsLevel runs on Web.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what OpsLevel is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that OpsLevel cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. OpsLevel covers Service catalogue, Scorecards and rubric, Checks, Campaigns.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
OpsLevel: How much does OpsLevel cost?
It does not publish pricing. Billing is per developer using the portal, with volume discounts, and a quote requires a sales conversation.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
OpsLevel: How does it compare with Backstage?
Backstage has no licence fee but you staff a team to build and run it. OpsLevel is hosted with checks, campaigns and scorecards out of the box, and you pay per developer instead.
Entrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
OpsLevel: Does it require writing catalogue YAML by hand?
No. It auto-discovers and enriches entries from connected systems, though teams still curate ownership and metadata.
OpsLevel: Can it run on premises?
Yes, but only on the Enterprise plan.
Related pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Backstage
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Earthly
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cortex
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Blacksmith
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Nix
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Depot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Spacelift
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ConfigCat
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Namespace
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ansible
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Garden
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs WarpBuild
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Pieces for Developers
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs RAD Studio
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Refact
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Restate
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs RubyMine
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Soketi
- OpsLevel vs Cisco Duo
- OpsLevel vs JumpCloud
- OpsLevel vs Ping Identity
- OpsLevel vs Frontegg
- OpsLevel vs Authelia
- OpsLevel vs Beyond Identity
- OpsLevel vs Transmit Security
- OpsLevel vs Akeyless
- OpsLevel vs authentik
- OpsLevel vs Logto
- OpsLevel vs Speakeasy
- OpsLevel vs Authy
- OpsLevel vs ExpressVPN
- OpsLevel vs Falco
- OpsLevel vs Fenergo
- OpsLevel vs Google Authenticator
- OpsLevel vs Grype
- OpsLevel vs Hanwha Vision
- OpsLevel vs Backstage
- OpsLevel vs Earthly
- OpsLevel vs Cortex
- OpsLevel vs Blacksmith
- OpsLevel vs Nix
- OpsLevel vs Depot
- OpsLevel vs Spacelift
- OpsLevel vs ConfigCat
- OpsLevel vs Namespace
- OpsLevel vs Ansible
- OpsLevel vs Garden
- OpsLevel vs WarpBuild
- OpsLevel vs Pieces for Developers
- OpsLevel vs RAD Studio
- OpsLevel vs Refact
- OpsLevel vs Restate
- OpsLevel vs RubyMine
- OpsLevel vs Soketi
