Blacksmithvs
WarpBuild


WarpBuild: Similar per-minute GitHub Actions runner pricing with comparable performance
Overview
Blacksmith accelerates CI/CD pipelines by providing faster, more cost-effective GitHub Actions runners as a drop-in replacement. The platform runs GitHub Actions on bare metal gaming CPUs with high single-core performance, features co-located dependency caching, and includes managed Docker layer persistence. Runners are available across multiple operating systems including Ubuntu x64 (0.004/min), Ubuntu ARM (0.0025/min), Windows x64 (0.008/min), and macOS M4 (0.08/min), each offering similar cost savings compared to GitHub's standard runners. All plans include a free tier of 3,000 minutes per month, an observability console for debugging CI pipelines, and support for Docker layer caching and sticky disks as add-ons. The platform is trusted by over 3,000 organizations and processes over 50 million jobs monthly. Enterprise customers receive custom pricing, 99.9% SLA guarantees, 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization consulting.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Blacksmith.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


WarpBuild: Similar per-minute GitHub Actions runner pricing with comparable performance


Depot: Full CI/CD platform with runners and build caching


GitHub Actions: GitHub's native runners with standard pricing
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Ubuntu x64
$0.004 /minute
Ubuntu ARM
$0.003 /minute
Windows x64
$0.008 /minute
macOS M4
$0.08 /minute
Enterprise
On request
Capabilities
Bare metal runners
High-performance bare metal infrastructure
Multiple OS support
Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS runners
ARM support
ARM architecture runners available
Docker layer caching
Persistent Docker layer cache storage
Sticky disks
Persistent disk storage across runs
GitHub Actions observability
Debug and monitor CI pipeline execution
Free tier
3,000 free minutes per month
Static IPs
Optional static IP addresses
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceYes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceEnterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceKeep looking
Code editing. Redefined.
Find and fix problems in JavaScript code
Fast, disk space efficient package manager
High-performance build system for JavaScript and TypeScript monorepos
AI pair programmer for developers
Open source design and prototyping platform
Open-source identity and access management server.
A language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software
A cross-platform IDE for C and C++
Software development environments and toolchains for Ada, C/C++ and Rust
Complete toolchain for embedded software development
Extensible, customizable free text editor and computing environment
Microcontroller Development Kit for Arm-based devices
Next generation frontend tooling
Multi-language build system with fast, correct incremental builds
Cloud platform for instant, isolated development sandboxes and code execution
Open-source, extensible IDE historically centered on Java development
Monorepo build system and version manager platform
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Blacksmith, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Interactive API documentation generated from OpenAPI specs
Engineering guardrails for the AI era
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
Monorepo build system and version manager platform
Fast, scalable build system with intelligent defaults for Python and more
Distributed CI and remote caching for monorepo teams
The dev platform for the next 100 billion commits