Cybersecurity · head to head
Entrust Identity as a Service vs PartyKit

Entrust Identity as a Service
Cybersecurity
Workforce and customer authentication from a certificate authority
- From
- $2/month
- Free plan
- No
PartyKit
Developer Tools
Platform for building and deploying realtime multiplayer servers on the edge
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only PartyKit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Entrust Identity as a Service the application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.; PartyKit documentation and FAQ material on the marketing site is sparse compared to larger realtime platforms.
- They diverge on capability: Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, PartyKit covers Stateful edge servers.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Entrust Identity as a Service and PartyKit actually diverge.
| Attribute | Entrust Identity as a Service | PartyKit |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux | web, api |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Entrust Identity as a Service
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Adaptive authentication
- Passwordless login
- Credential lifecycle
- Derived PIV credentials
- Directory integration
Only in PartyKit
- Stateful edge servers
- WebSocket-first API
- CRDT library compatibility
- Framework integrations
- Global edge deployment
- Custom domains
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- A government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing PIV smart card estatenot PartyKit
- A bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staffnot PartyKit
- An organisation already buying Entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendornot PartyKit
- A defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorlynot PartyKit
PartyKit
- Multiplayer collaborative appsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Realtime AI agent backendsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Live cursors and presencenot Entrust Identity as a Service
- Collaborative whiteboards and documentsnot Entrust Identity as a Service
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Entrust Identity as a Service
- The application integration catalogue is smaller than that of the dedicated identity vendors, so uncommon SaaS applications more often need custom SAML configuration rather than a template.
- Developer experience for customer identity use cases is behind the specialists, and teams building consumer signup flows will find the APIs and documentation less complete.
- Advanced capabilities including adaptive authentication and credential management sit above the published entry price, so the two dollar figure rarely reflects what a regulated buyer actually spends.
- There are two overlapping products, Identity as a Service and Identity Enterprise, and choosing wrongly at the start means a migration later rather than a licence change.
- Identity governance, access certification and privileged access are not covered, so an organisation with audit-driven access review requirements needs a second vendor alongside it.
PartyKit
- Documentation and FAQ material on the marketing site is sparse compared to larger realtime platforms.
- Commercial free tier requires deploying to the user's own Cloudflare account, adding setup complexity.
- Storage on the free Individual plan clears every 24 hours, limiting it to prototyping rather than persistent production data.
- Smaller ecosystem and community than more established realtime infrastructure providers.
Pricing, plan by plan
Entrust Identity as a Service
$2/month- Workforce Standard$2/month
- Multi-factor authentication
- Single sign-on
- Directory integration
- Higher tiers$undefined/month
- Adaptive risk-based authentication
- Certificate and smart card credential management
- Derived PIV credentials
PartyKit
Free- IndividualFree
- Up to 10 live projects
- Deploy to the global edge platform
- Storage clears every 24 hours
- CommercialFree
- Unlimited projects
- Custom domains
- Runs on your own Cloudflare account; pay only Cloudflare usage
Which should you pick?
Choose Entrust Identity as a Service if
- You need multi-factor authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux.
- You also want single sign-on.
Choose PartyKit if
- You need stateful edge servers.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want websocket-first api.
Questions people ask
- Is Entrust Identity as a Service or PartyKit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month and PartyKit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Entrust Identity as a Service or PartyKit?
- PartyKit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2/month for Entrust Identity as a Service and Free for PartyKit.
- Does Entrust Identity as a Service or PartyKit run on more platforms?
- Entrust Identity as a Service runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux. PartyKit runs on web, api.
- Can I use PartyKit for free?
- Yes. PartyKit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Entrust Identity as a Service starts at $2/month.
- What is Entrust Identity as a Service best used for?
- Entrust Identity as a Service is most often used for a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate, a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff, an organisation already buying entrust certificates that wants credential issuance and authentication from one vendor, a defence supplier required to use certificate-based authentication that mainstream cloud identity products handle poorly. Of those, a government agency needing derived mobile credentials from an existing piv smart card estate and a bank that must support hardware tokens for corporate treasury users alongside push authentication for staff are not what PartyKit is typically brought in for.
- What can Entrust Identity as a Service do that PartyKit cannot?
- Entrust Identity as a Service covers Multi-factor authentication, Single sign-on, Adaptive authentication, Passwordless login. PartyKit covers Stateful edge servers, WebSocket-first API, CRDT library compatibility, Framework integrations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Entrust Identity as a Service: Is MFA included or extra?
Multi-factor authentication is included in the workforce bundles rather than sold separately, which is not true of every competitor. Adaptive risk-based authentication sits in higher tiers.
PartyKit: How much does PartyKit cost?
PartyKit is completely free. Both the Individual and Commercial plans have no upfront costs.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Does it do identity governance?
No. Access certification, role mining and joiner-mover-leaver governance require a separate product such as SailPoint or Saviynt.
PartyKit: What is PartyKit's Individual plan?
The Individual plan is free and includes deployment to a global edge platform, support for up to 10 live projects, and is suitable for small projects. Storage is cleared every 24 hours.
SourceEntrust Identity as a Service: Why choose this over Okta or Entra ID?
Almost always because of PKI, smart cards or derived credentials. Without that requirement the mainstream platforms are the stronger general purpose choice.
PartyKit: What is PartyKit's Commercial plan?
The Commercial plan is free but requires deploying to your own Cloudflare account. It includes custom domains, unlimited projects, and you pay only your Cloudflare usage costs.
SourcePartyKit: Can I upgrade from Individual to Commercial plan?
Yes, both plans are free but offer different feature sets. The Commercial plan removes project restrictions but requires managing your own Cloudflare infrastructure.
SourceRelated pages
More on Entrust Identity as a Service
Other head to heads
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Cisco Duo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs JumpCloud
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Ping Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Frontegg
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authelia
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Beyond Identity
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Transmit Security
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Akeyless
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs authentik
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Logto
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Speakeasy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Authy
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs ExpressVPN
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Falco
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Fenergo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Google Authenticator
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Grype
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Hanwha Vision
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Soketi
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs GitHub Copilot
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Pieces for Developers
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs CodeSandbox
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Moonrepo
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Swagger UI
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Coder
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs StackBlitz
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Deep Code
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Refact
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Earthly
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Buildkite
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs SonarQube
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sourcegraph
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Sweep
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Visual Studio
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Warp
- Entrust Identity as a Service vs Xlinesoft
- PartyKit vs Cisco Duo
- PartyKit vs JumpCloud
- PartyKit vs Ping Identity
- PartyKit vs Frontegg
- PartyKit vs Authelia
- PartyKit vs Beyond Identity
- PartyKit vs Transmit Security
- PartyKit vs Akeyless
- PartyKit vs authentik
- PartyKit vs Logto
- PartyKit vs Speakeasy
- PartyKit vs Authy
- PartyKit vs ExpressVPN
- PartyKit vs Falco
- PartyKit vs Fenergo
- PartyKit vs Google Authenticator
- PartyKit vs Grype
- PartyKit vs Hanwha Vision
- PartyKit vs Soketi
- PartyKit vs GitHub Copilot
- PartyKit vs Pieces for Developers
- PartyKit vs CodeSandbox
- PartyKit vs Moonrepo
- PartyKit vs Swagger UI
- PartyKit vs Coder
- PartyKit vs StackBlitz
- PartyKit vs Deep Code
- PartyKit vs Refact
- PartyKit vs Earthly
- PartyKit vs Buildkite
- PartyKit vs SonarQube
- PartyKit vs Sourcegraph
- PartyKit vs Sweep
- PartyKit vs Visual Studio
- PartyKit vs Warp
- PartyKit vs Xlinesoft
