Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Blacksmith

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Blacksmith
Developer Tools
2x faster GitHub Actions with 60% cost savings
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Blacksmith per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- They diverge on capability: Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Blacksmith actually diverge.
| Attribute | Authelia | Blacksmith |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | Unknown |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted | GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Developer Tools |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Blacksmith
- Bare metal runners
- Multiple OS support
- ARM support
- Docker layer caching
- Sticky disks
- GitHub Actions observability
- Free tier
- Static IPs
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Blacksmith
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Blacksmith
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Blacksmith
Blacksmith
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster, cheaper infrastructurenot Authelia
- Accelerating CI build times for organizations with heavy CI loadnot Authelia
- Reducing cloud spend on GitHub Actions by 60% or morenot Authelia
- Supporting ARM architecture builds without GitHub runnersnot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Blacksmith
- Per-minute pricing model requires estimating usage to predict costs
- macOS M4 pricing ($0.08/min) is significantly higher than GitHub Actions
- Docker layer caching and sticky disks are paid add-ons at $0.50/GB/mo
- Static IP add-on costs $100/IP/mo
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Blacksmith
Free- Ubuntu x64$0.004/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Ubuntu ARM$0.0025/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- Windows x64$0.008/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
- macOS M4$0.08/minute
- 3,000 free minutes per month
- 2x faster hardware
- 4x faster cache downloads
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Blacksmith if
- You need bare metal runners.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- You also want multiple os support.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Blacksmith better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Blacksmith at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Blacksmith?
- Authelia starts at Free and Blacksmith at Free.
- Does Authelia or Blacksmith run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Blacksmith runs on GitHub Actions, Linux, Windows, macOS.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Blacksmith is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Blacksmith cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends. Blacksmith covers Bare metal runners, Multiple OS support, ARM support, Docker layer caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Blacksmith: How much do Blacksmith runners cost compared to GitHub Actions?
Blacksmith offers 60-75% cost savings depending on OS. Ubuntu x64 costs $0.004/min vs GitHub at $0.012/min. All plans include 3,000 free minutes monthly.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Blacksmith: Can I use Docker layer caching with Blacksmith?
Yes, Docker layer caching is available as an add-on at $0.50/GB/mo. Managed Docker layer persistence is included with the base service.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Blacksmith: What is the SLA for Enterprise plans?
Enterprise Blacksmith plans include a 99.9% SLA guarantee along with 24/7 priority support, dedicated Slack channels, white-glove onboarding, and CI optimization support.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs WarpBuild
- Authelia vs Depot
- Authelia vs Namespace
- Authelia vs Earthly
- Authelia vs Nx Cloud
- Authelia vs OpsLevel
- Authelia vs Garden
- Authelia vs ConfigCat
- Authelia vs Dagger
- Authelia vs Nix
- Authelia vs Rust
- Authelia vs Ansible
- Authelia vs PartyKit
- Authelia vs PhpStorm
- Authelia vs Pieces for Developers
- Authelia vs RAD Studio
- Authelia vs Refact
- Blacksmith vs authentik
- Blacksmith vs Logto
- Blacksmith vs Ory Kratos
- Blacksmith vs Frontegg
- Blacksmith vs Infisical
- Blacksmith vs Bitwarden
- Blacksmith vs Semgrep
- Blacksmith vs Trivy
- Blacksmith vs Chainguard
- Blacksmith vs Passbolt
- Blacksmith vs 1Password
- Blacksmith vs Signicat
- Blacksmith vs Silent Eight
- Blacksmith vs Socket
- Blacksmith vs Socure
- Blacksmith vs SonicWall
- Blacksmith vs Sophos Intercept X
- Blacksmith vs Ory
- Blacksmith vs WarpBuild
- Blacksmith vs Depot
- Blacksmith vs Namespace
- Blacksmith vs Earthly
- Blacksmith vs Nx Cloud
- Blacksmith vs OpsLevel
- Blacksmith vs Garden
- Blacksmith vs ConfigCat
- Blacksmith vs Dagger
- Blacksmith vs Nix
- Blacksmith vs Rust
- Blacksmith vs Ansible
- Blacksmith vs PartyKit
- Blacksmith vs PhpStorm
- Blacksmith vs Pieces for Developers
- Blacksmith vs RAD Studio
- Blacksmith vs Refact
