Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Helix

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Helix
Developer Tools
Post-modern modal text editor for the terminal, written in Rust
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Helix no official GUI application yet, so it requires comfort with terminal workflows.
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Helix covers Multiple Selections.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Helix actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Helix
- Multiple Selections
- Tree-sitter Syntax Trees
- Built-in LSP Support
- Fuzzy File Finder
- Project-wide Search
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Helix
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Helix
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Helix
Helix
- Editing code over SSH or in tmux sessionsnot authentik
- Working with syntax-aware selection and navigationnot authentik
- Getting IDE-like completion and diagnostics without plugin setupnot authentik
- Lightweight, low-resource code editing on laptopsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Helix
- No official GUI application yet, so it requires comfort with terminal workflows.
- Plugin ecosystem is far smaller than Vim's or Neovim's, limiting customization.
- Keybindings differ from both Vim and Kakoune, adding a learning curve for users of either.
- Configuration is more limited than Neovim's Lua-based extensibility.
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Helix
Free- FreeFree
- Full editor, no paid tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Helix if
- You need multiple selections.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on linux, mac, windows.
- You also want tree-sitter syntax trees.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Helix better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Helix at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Helix?
- authentik starts at Free and Helix at Free.
- Does authentik or Helix run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Helix runs on linux, mac, windows.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Helix is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Helix cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Helix covers Multiple Selections, Tree-sitter Syntax Trees, Built-in LSP Support, Fuzzy File Finder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Helix: Is Helix free to use?
Yes, Helix is free and open source, licensed under the Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL-2.0), with no paid tiers or subscriptions.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Helix: How do I install Helix?
Install via your operating system's package manager, or download pre-built binaries from GitHub Releases; the nightly version requires building from source.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Helix: Does Helix support plugins?
Not yet. Helix currently has no plugin system, though the project intends to add one eventually; it instead ships with built-in LSP and tree-sitter support out of the box.
SourceHelix: How do I configure Helix?
Helix ships with sane modern defaults requiring much less config-file fiddling than Vim, though settings can still be customized in a config.toml file.
SourceHelix: Where can I get help or support?
Support is community-driven via GitHub for code and issues, the Matrix chat for discussion, and OpenCollective for funding ongoing development.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs GNU Emacs
- authentik vs Notepad++
- authentik vs Frappe
- authentik vs Restate
- authentik vs Visual Studio Code
- authentik vs Penpot
- authentik vs Rust
- authentik vs Ansible
- authentik vs Bazel
- authentik vs Eclipse IDE
- authentik vs Pants Build
- authentik vs Swagger UI
- authentik vs Tilt
- authentik vs WarpBuild
- authentik vs Webpack
- authentik vs Avo
- authentik vs Azure DevOps
- authentik vs Backstage
- Helix vs Authelia
- Helix vs Logto
- Helix vs Ory
- Helix vs Passbolt
- Helix vs Clerk
- Helix vs 1Password
- Helix vs Frontegg
- Helix vs OWASP ZAP
- Helix vs Infisical
- Helix vs Chainguard
- Helix vs Bitwarden
- Helix vs Cosign
- Helix vs CyberGhost VPN
- Helix vs Dahua Technology
- Helix vs Descope
- Helix vs Drata
- Helix vs DTiQ
- Helix vs Ory Kratos
- Helix vs GNU Emacs
- Helix vs Notepad++
- Helix vs Frappe
- Helix vs Restate
- Helix vs Visual Studio Code
- Helix vs Penpot
- Helix vs Rust
- Helix vs Ansible
- Helix vs Bazel
- Helix vs Eclipse IDE
- Helix vs Pants Build
- Helix vs Swagger UI
- Helix vs Tilt
- Helix vs WarpBuild
- Helix vs Webpack
- Helix vs Avo
- Helix vs Azure DevOps
- Helix vs Backstage
