Spreadsheets · head to head
APITable vs GraphQL Apollo

APITable
Spreadsheets
Open source spreadsheet database with an API first design and an embeddable widget system
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: APITable records are held in the product own schema rather than as native database tables, so the practical row ceiling is a product limit and large tables should be load tested before commitment.; GraphQL Apollo standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- They diverge on capability: APITable covers API first design, GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which APITable and GraphQL Apollo actually diverge.
| Attribute | APITable | GraphQL Apollo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | freemium |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile |
| Category | Spreadsheets | APIs |
| Founded | Unknown | 2016 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in APITable
- API first design
- Widget SDK
- Embeddable views
- Multiple view types
- Linked records and formulas
- Self hosting
- Real time collaboration
Only in GraphQL Apollo
- Apollo Server
- Apollo Client
- GraphQL Federation
- REST APIs
- Microservices
- Databases
- JavaScript support
- Node.js support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
APITable
- Embedding an editable table view inside a product you are building, rather than sending users to another toolnot GraphQL Apollo
- An internal platform where tables are read and written mostly by code through the API and only occasionally by peoplenot GraphQL Apollo
- A self hosted replacement for a per seat spreadsheet database where seat count is the cost drivernot GraphQL Apollo
- Building a custom dashboard widget that sits beside the data instead of in a separate reporting toolnot GraphQL Apollo
GraphQL Apollo
- GraphQL API managementnot APITable
- Schema federationnot APITable
- API analytics and monitoringnot APITable
- Developer-focused infrastructurenot APITable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
APITable
- Records are held in the product own schema rather than as native database tables, so the practical row ceiling is a product limit and large tables should be load tested before commitment.
- The hosted free tier caps records per space, so evaluating on the cloud version gives a misleading picture of what the software can do when self hosted.
- Automation is thin compared with the commercial alternatives, and most real workflows end up in an external automation tool.
- The self hosted deployment is heavier than a single container, so running it properly means managing several services rather than one.
- Documentation and community activity are uneven in English, and finding an answer to an operational problem can take longer than the problem itself deserves.
GraphQL Apollo
- Standard and Enterprise plans require sales contact for custom pricing
- Free plan limited to 3 developers and 1-day retention
- Self-hosted router on free tier heavily rate-limited to 60 requests/minute
Pricing, plan by plan
APITable
Free- Self hosted open sourceFree
- No licence fee
- No product record cap on self hosted deployments
- Docker and Kubernetes deployment
GraphQL Apollo
Free- FreeFree
- 3 developers
- 1-day data retention
- Community support only
- Developer$5/per million requests
- $50 usage credit for new signups
- Up to 10 developers
- 7-day data retention
- Standard$null/custom
- Up to 30 developers
- 90-day data retention
- Standard support with SLA (8x5)
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited developers
- 18-month data retention
- Business support 24x7x365 with SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose APITable if
- You need api first design.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want widget sdk.
Choose GraphQL Apollo if
- You need apollo server.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- You also want apollo client.
Questions people ask
- Is APITable or GraphQL Apollo better?
- Neither clearly leads. APITable starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, APITable or GraphQL Apollo?
- APITable starts at Free and GraphQL Apollo at Free.
- Does APITable or GraphQL Apollo run on more platforms?
- APITable runs on Web, Linux. GraphQL Apollo runs on JavaScript, Node.js, Web, Mobile.
- Can I use APITable for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is APITable best used for?
- APITable is most often used for embedding an editable table view inside a product you are building, rather than sending users to another tool, an internal platform where tables are read and written mostly by code through the api and only occasionally by people, a self hosted replacement for a per seat spreadsheet database where seat count is the cost driver, building a custom dashboard widget that sits beside the data instead of in a separate reporting tool. Of those, embedding an editable table view inside a product you are building, rather than sending users to another tool and an internal platform where tables are read and written mostly by code through the api and only occasionally by people are not what GraphQL Apollo is typically brought in for.
- What can APITable do that GraphQL Apollo cannot?
- APITable covers API first design, Widget SDK, Embeddable views, Multiple view types. GraphQL Apollo covers Apollo Server, Apollo Client, GraphQL Federation, REST APIs.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
APITable: What is the record limit?
The self hosted edition has no product cap, but performance is bounded by the internal schema rather than by your database. Test at your expected size.
GraphQL Apollo: How much does Apollo GraphQL cost?
Apollo GraphQL is free for up to 3 developers. Paid plans start at $5 per million GraphQL requests on the Developer plan, which includes $50 usage credit for new signups. Standard and Enterprise plans require custom pricing via sales contact.
SourceAPITable: Can I embed it in my own product?
Yes, and that is the main reason to choose it. Views embed and the widget SDK extends them.
GraphQL Apollo: Is there a free version of Apollo GraphQL?
Yes, Apollo GraphQL offers a forever-free plan with no credit card required for up to 3 developers, including 1-day data retention, community support, and self-hosted GraphOS Router rate-limited to 60 requests per minute.
SourceAPITable: Is the hosted version representative?
No. Its free tier caps records per space, which is a commercial limit rather than a technical one.
GraphQL Apollo: What does Apollo's Enterprise plan include that Standard does not?
The Enterprise plan offers unlimited developers versus 30 on Standard, 18-month data retention versus 90 days, and 24x7x365 business support with SLA instead of 8x5 support. It also includes premium and professional services add-ons and custom MSA agreements. Both require custom pricing.
SourceAPITable: How hard is self hosting?
Harder than a single container. Plan for several services and someone to keep them running.
APITable: Does it do automations?
Lightly. Expect to pair it with an external automation tool for anything multi step.
Related pages
More on GraphQL Apollo
Other head to heads
- APITable vs Baserow
- APITable vs NocoDB
- APITable vs Teable
- APITable vs SeaTable
- APITable vs Mathesar
- APITable vs Rowy
- APITable vs Cube Software
- APITable vs Sigma Computing
- APITable vs Numbers
- APITable vs Tableau
- APITable vs Metabase
- APITable vs Looker
- APITable vs Equals
- APITable vs Coefficient
- APITable vs Hasura
- APITable vs Appwrite
- APITable vs PocketBase
- APITable vs Sanity
- APITable vs Strapi
- APITable vs GraphQL Playground
- APITable vs Kong Gateway
- APITable vs Parse Server
- APITable vs WSO2 API Manager
- APITable vs Janus Gateway
- APITable vs Directus
- APITable vs KeystoneJS
- APITable vs Solaris
- APITable vs Stainless
- APITable vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- APITable vs Thredd
- APITable vs Thunder Client
- GraphQL Apollo vs Baserow
- GraphQL Apollo vs NocoDB
- GraphQL Apollo vs Teable
- GraphQL Apollo vs SeaTable
- GraphQL Apollo vs Mathesar
- GraphQL Apollo vs Rowy
- GraphQL Apollo vs Cube Software
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sigma Computing
- GraphQL Apollo vs Numbers
- GraphQL Apollo vs Tableau
- GraphQL Apollo vs Metabase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Looker
- GraphQL Apollo vs Equals
- GraphQL Apollo vs Coefficient
- GraphQL Apollo vs Hasura
- GraphQL Apollo vs Appwrite
- GraphQL Apollo vs PocketBase
- GraphQL Apollo vs Sanity
- GraphQL Apollo vs Strapi
- GraphQL Apollo vs GraphQL Playground
- GraphQL Apollo vs Kong Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Parse Server
- GraphQL Apollo vs WSO2 API Manager
- GraphQL Apollo vs Janus Gateway
- GraphQL Apollo vs Directus
- GraphQL Apollo vs KeystoneJS
- GraphQL Apollo vs Solaris
- GraphQL Apollo vs Stainless
- GraphQL Apollo vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thredd
- GraphQL Apollo vs Thunder Client

