Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

Annalise.ai vs Epic MyChart

Annalise.ai logo

Annalise.ai

Healthcare

Multi-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
E

Epic MyChart

Healthcare

Patient portal for accessing health records and communicating with providers

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Annalise.ai the United States cleared indication covers roughly ten findings for triage and notification, far fewer than the model reports, so a buyer who evaluates the full multi-finding output and then contracts in the United States gets a much narrower cleared use.; Epic MyChart myChart is not a direct-to-consumer product; Epic markets it as a tool that healthcare organizations license and configure to engage their own patients, so access depends entirely on a patient's provider having deployed Epic.
  • They diverge on capability: Annalise.ai covers Annalise Enterprise CXR, Epic MyChart covers View Medical Records.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Annalise.ai and Epic MyChart actually diverge.

Attributes where Annalise.ai and Epic MyChart differ
AttributeAnnalise.aiEpic MyChart
PlatformsWeb, Cloud, On-premiseWeb, Mobile
FoundedUnknown1979

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Annalise.ai

  • Annalise Enterprise CXR
  • Annalise Enterprise CTB
  • Triage and notification
  • Worklist reprioritisation
  • Localisation overlays
  • Confidence output
  • PACS-native deployment
  • On-premise or cloud inference

Only in Epic MyChart

  • View Medical Records
  • Secure Messaging
  • Appointment Scheduling
  • Prescription Management
  • Bill Pay
  • Medical History
  • Epic EHR
  • Lab Systems

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Annalise.ai

  • An emergency department wanting pneumothorax and intracranial haemorrhage pushed to the front of the reading queue overnight when cover is thinnestnot Epic MyChart
  • A teleradiology provider covering many small hospitals that needs consistent triage before a human readsnot Epic MyChart
  • A screening programme in Europe where the broader CE marked decision support indication, rather than the narrow United States triage clearance, is what is being deployednot Epic MyChart
  • A radiology department building an AI governance programme that wants one vendor covering both chest radiograph and head CT rather than contracting two separate algorithm suppliersnot Epic MyChart

Epic MyChart

  • Patient Carenot Annalise.ai
  • Medical Recordsnot Annalise.ai
  • Practice Managementnot Annalise.ai
  • Telehealthnot Annalise.ai

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Annalise.ai

  • The United States cleared indication covers roughly ten findings for triage and notification, far fewer than the model reports, so a buyer who evaluates the full multi-finding output and then contracts in the United States gets a much narrower cleared use.
  • Triage AI reprioritises a worklist but does not change clinical decisions on its own, so departments that do not redesign how urgent studies are picked up see no measurable improvement in time to treatment.
  • Published validation is largely reader study evidence on detection of individual findings; prospective evidence of shorter time to treatment in routine emergency care is thin.
  • The Annalise brand is being migrated under the Harrison.ai name for the critical care offering, which creates ambiguity in multi-year contracts about what product name is actually being supported.
  • A high finding count raises the alert burden, and departments report that low prevalence findings generate false positives that erode radiologist trust unless the alerting thresholds are tuned locally.

Epic MyChart

  • MyChart is not a direct-to-consumer product; Epic markets it as a tool that healthcare organizations license and configure to engage their own patients, so access depends entirely on a patient's provider having deployed Epic.

Pricing, plan by plan

Annalise.ai

On request
  • Annalise Enterprise$undefined/year
    • Priced per study analysed or as an annual volume subscription
    • CXR and CTB licensed separately
    • Cleared finding set differs by market, which changes what you are buying

Epic MyChart

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Epic MyChart review.

Which should you pick?

Choose Annalise.ai if

  • You need annalise enterprise cxr.
  • You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
  • You also want annalise enterprise ctb.
Annalise.ai review

Choose Epic MyChart if

  • You need view medical records.
  • You work on Web, Mobile.
  • You also want secure messaging.
Epic MyChart review

Questions people ask

Is Annalise.ai or Epic MyChart better?
Neither clearly leads. Annalise.ai starts at On request and Epic MyChart at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Annalise.ai or Epic MyChart?
Annalise.ai starts at On request and Epic MyChart at On request.
Does Annalise.ai or Epic MyChart run on more platforms?
Annalise.ai runs on Web, Cloud, On-premise. Epic MyChart runs on Web, Mobile.
What is Annalise.ai best used for?
Annalise.ai is most often used for an emergency department wanting pneumothorax and intracranial haemorrhage pushed to the front of the reading queue overnight when cover is thinnest, a teleradiology provider covering many small hospitals that needs consistent triage before a human reads, a screening programme in europe where the broader ce marked decision support indication, rather than the narrow united states triage clearance, is what is being deployed, a radiology department building an ai governance programme that wants one vendor covering both chest radiograph and head ct rather than contracting two separate algorithm suppliers. Of those, an emergency department wanting pneumothorax and intracranial haemorrhage pushed to the front of the reading queue overnight when cover is thinnest and a teleradiology provider covering many small hospitals that needs consistent triage before a human reads are not what Epic MyChart is typically brought in for.
What can Annalise.ai do that Epic MyChart cannot?
Annalise.ai covers Annalise Enterprise CXR, Annalise Enterprise CTB, Triage and notification, Worklist reprioritisation. Epic MyChart covers View Medical Records, Secure Messaging, Appointment Scheduling, Prescription Management.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Annalise.ai: How many findings are FDA cleared?

Around ten across chest X-ray and head CT, for triage and notification only. The model reports far more findings than that; the rest are not cleared in the United States.

Annalise.ai: Is the European position different?

Yes. CE marking under the medical device regulation covers a broader decision support indication than the United States triage and notification clearances, so the same software is a different regulatory product depending on where you deploy it.

Annalise.ai: Does it diagnose?

No. In the United States it is a triage and notification device: it flags studies for earlier review, and the radiologist makes the diagnosis.

Annalise.ai: Is Annalise.ai becoming Harrison.ai?

The critical care offering is now marketed under the Harrison.ai name. Ask the vendor to name the contracted product explicitly before signing a multi-year deal.

Share

Related pages

More on Annalise.ai

More on Epic MyChart

Keep looking

Other head to heads