CAD · head to head
3D-Coat vs COMSOL Multiphysics

COMSOL Multiphysics
CAD
Finite element simulation built around coupling physics, with add-on modules licensed separately
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: 3D-Coat specific pricing not disclosed on website; COMSOL Multiphysics the base licence covers very little on its own and nearly every practical problem needs one or more add-on modules, each priced separately, so the quoted total is typically a multiple of the headline base figure.
- They diverge on capability: 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, COMSOL Multiphysics covers Coupled multiphysics solving.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which 3D-Coat and COMSOL Multiphysics actually diverge.
| Attribute | 3D-Coat | COMSOL Multiphysics |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/month | On request |
| Pricing model | one-time | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, MacOS, Linux | Windows, Linux, macOS |
| Founded | 2007 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CAD).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in 3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting
- Surface sculpting
- Retopology
- UV mapping
- Texture painting
- PBR materials
- Smart materials
- Baking
Only in COMSOL Multiphysics
- Coupled multiphysics solving
- Equation-based modelling
- Add-on module library
- Application Builder
- COMSOL Compiler and Server
- CAD import and LiveLink
- Parametric sweeps and optimisation
- Cluster and cloud computing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
3D-Coat
- Voxel sculpting from a digital clay blocknot COMSOL Multiphysics
- Retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshesnot COMSOL Multiphysics
- UV mapping and PBR texturingnot COMSOL Multiphysics
- Preparing print-ready models for 3D printingnot COMSOL Multiphysics
- Node-based material authoring on the GPUnot COMSOL Multiphysics
COMSOL Multiphysics
- Modelling a device where physics are strongly coupled, such as induction heating that changes material properties which change the fieldnot 3D-Coat
- Research work needing custom partial differential equations that no packaged solver in a mainstream tool providesnot 3D-Coat
- Packaging a validated model as an app so process engineers can run studies without learning the simulation toolnot 3D-Coat
- A department wanting shared concurrent access via a Floating Network Licence, with cluster runs at no extra licence costnot 3D-Coat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
3D-Coat
- Specific pricing not disclosed on website
- 3DCoatPrint free version limited to 40K triangles on export
- Requires contacting sales or visiting store for pricing details
COMSOL Multiphysics
- The base licence covers very little on its own and nearly every practical problem needs one or more add-on modules, each priced separately, so the quoted total is typically a multiple of the headline base figure.
- Perpetual licences renew maintenance at 20% of the then-current price each year, and because that percentage applies to the whole module stack the annual bill grows as your module list does and as list prices rise.
- No pricing at all is published, so procurement cannot benchmark or budget without a sales engagement, and comparisons against Ansys or SolidWorks Simulation are effectively impossible before that point.
- Named Single-User and CPU-locked licences do not share, so a team of six that bought individual licences ends up with idle seats while a Floating Network Licence would have covered them, and switching licence type is a commercial renegotiation.
- Solving strongly coupled systems is memory hungry and slow, and models that look modest in the GUI routinely need tens of gigabytes of RAM, so hardware cost is a real and often underestimated part of adoption.
Pricing, plan by plan
3D-Coat
$29/month- Amateur$99/month
- Non-commercial use
- Professional$379/month
- Full commercial license
- Floating$568/month
- Network licensing
COMSOL Multiphysics
On request- COMSOL Multiphysics base licence$undefined/year
- CPU-locked, Named Single-User or Floating Network licence types
- Perpetual or term licensing
- Perpetual includes updates and support for 12 months, then renews at 20% of current price
- Academic licences$undefined/year
- Class Kit Licence for up to 30 concurrent users per class
- Academic Server Licence for up to 300 concurrent app users
- Quote through the academic sales channel
Which should you pick?
Choose 3D-Coat if
- You need voxel sculpting.
- You work on Windows, MacOS, Linux.
- You also want surface sculpting.
Choose COMSOL Multiphysics if
- You need coupled multiphysics solving.
- You work on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- You also want equation-based modelling.
Questions people ask
- Is 3D-Coat or COMSOL Multiphysics better?
- Neither clearly leads. 3D-Coat starts at $29/month and COMSOL Multiphysics at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, 3D-Coat or COMSOL Multiphysics?
- 3D-Coat starts at $29/month and COMSOL Multiphysics at On request.
- Does 3D-Coat or COMSOL Multiphysics run on more platforms?
- 3D-Coat runs on Windows, MacOS, Linux. COMSOL Multiphysics runs on Windows, Linux, macOS.
- What is 3D-Coat best used for?
- 3D-Coat is most often used for voxel sculpting from a digital clay block, retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes, uv mapping and pbr texturing, preparing print-ready models for 3d printing. Of those, voxel sculpting from a digital clay block and retopology of high-density sculpts into production meshes are not what COMSOL Multiphysics is typically brought in for.
- What can 3D-Coat do that COMSOL Multiphysics cannot?
- 3D-Coat covers Voxel sculpting, Surface sculpting, Retopology, UV mapping. COMSOL Multiphysics covers Coupled multiphysics solving, Equation-based modelling, Add-on module library, Application Builder.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
3D-Coat: Is there a free version of 3D Coat?
Yes, 3D Coat offers multiple free options. 3DCoatPrint is a special free version designed for 3D print-ready models, limited to 40K triangles on export. Additionally, a 30-day unlimited trial is available for the full version.
SourceCOMSOL Multiphysics: Does the base licence include CFD or structural mechanics?
Only limited capability. Serious CFD, structural, RF and acoustics work each require the relevant add-on module at extra cost.
3D-Coat: What is the 30-day trial period for 3D Coat?
3D Coat provides a 30-day trial with unlimited learning resources. The trial grants full access to all tools needed to create production-ready, fully textured 3D models.
SourceCOMSOL Multiphysics: What does maintenance cost?
Perpetual licences include 12 months of updates and support, then renew at 20% of the then-current price per year.
3D-Coat: Does 3D Coat offer specialized versions?
Yes, 3D Coat offers 3DCoatTextura as a specialized version focused on texturing and rendering at a more affordable price than the full 3DCoat version.
SourceCOMSOL Multiphysics: Which licence type should a team buy?
Floating Network if more than a couple of people use it, since it shares concurrency and includes cluster and cloud computing at no extra charge.
COMSOL Multiphysics: Is pricing published?
No. COMSOL publishes licence types but no prices; every purchase goes through a quote.
Related pages
More on COMSOL Multiphysics
Other head to heads
- 3D-Coat vs FreeCAD
- 3D-Coat vs V-Ray
- 3D-Coat vs Enscape
- 3D-Coat vs KeyShot
- 3D-Coat vs Mudbox
- 3D-Coat vs ZBrush
- 3D-Coat vs Mari
- 3D-Coat vs Nomad Sculpt
- 3D-Coat vs Plasticity
- 3D-Coat vs Bentley MicroStation
- 3D-Coat vs Rhino 3D
- 3D-Coat vs Shapr3D
- 3D-Coat vs ANSYS Fluent
- 3D-Coat vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- 3D-Coat vs Carlson Software
- 3D-Coat vs Arnold
- 3D-Coat vs Inventor
- 3D-Coat vs OnShape
- 3D-Coat vs Siemens NX
- 3D-Coat vs Creo
- 3D-Coat vs nTop
- 3D-Coat vs Houdini
- 3D-Coat vs CoreTechnologie
- 3D-Coat vs Bambu Studio
- 3D-Coat vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- 3D-Coat vs Zoo
- 3D-Coat vs Twinmotion
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs FreeCAD
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs V-Ray
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Enscape
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs KeyShot
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Mudbox
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs ZBrush
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Mari
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Nomad Sculpt
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Plasticity
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Bentley MicroStation
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Rhino 3D
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Shapr3D
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs ANSYS Fluent
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Bentley iTwin Capture Modeler
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Carlson Software
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Arnold
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Inventor
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs OnShape
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Siemens NX
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Creo
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs nTop
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Houdini
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs CoreTechnologie
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Bambu Studio
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs MoI (Moment of Inspiration)
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Zoo
- COMSOL Multiphysics vs Twinmotion

