LMS · head to head
Skilljar vs Weet

Skilljar
LMS
Customer education platform that treats training completion as a commercial signal in the CRM
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Weet
LMS
Asynchronous training video with AI avatars, quizzes and a searchable knowledge library
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Weet has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Skilljar pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.; Weet the free tier is capped at three weets, which is far tighter than the free tiers of the screen recording tools it is compared against, so any real evaluation has to happen on the paid plan.
- They diverge on capability: Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue, Weet covers Screen and webcam recording.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Skilljar and Weet actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (LMS).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Skilljar
- Branded course catalogue
- CRM data write-back
- Certification with expiry
- Domain and theme control
- Self-paced and instructor-led
- Engagement analytics
Only in Weet
- Screen and webcam recording
- Document to video
- AI avatars
- Automatic transcription
- Interactive annotations
- Quizzes and learning paths
- Central library
- GxP compliance
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Skilljar
- A software company whose support ticket volume is driven by customers who were never trainednot Weet
- Customer success teams that want training engagement visible next to renewal risk in Salesforcenot Weet
- Partner certification programmes where credentials must expire and be renewednot Weet
- Reducing time to first value during onboarding by giving customers self serve training before implementationnot Weet
Weet
- A life sciences or pharmaceutical team needing auditable GxP compliant training records rather than an untracked video librarynot Skilljar
- An internal enablement team converting existing written standard operating procedures into video without filming anythingnot Skilljar
- A distributed team building a searchable how to library so the same question is not answered live every weeknot Skilljar
- A training function that needs completion statistics and quiz results, not just view countsnot Skilljar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Skilljar
- Pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
- The commercial value depends on the Salesforce integration being properly configured, and companies with messy CRM data get engagement reporting joined to accounts that do not reflect reality.
- It is built for external audiences, so using it for internal employee compliance means paying for capability that internal training does not need.
- Content authoring is not a strength, so most customers licence an authoring tool separately and run two content workflows.
- Attribution remains contested. The platform shows that trained accounts renew better, but establishing that training caused the renewal rather than that engaged customers train more is a problem the reporting cannot solve for you.
Weet
- The free tier is capped at three weets, which is far tighter than the free tiers of the screen recording tools it is compared against, so any real evaluation has to happen on the paid plan.
- Quizzes, learning paths, single sign on and GxP compliance are all Enterprise only, so the features that distinguish Weet from a screen recorder are not available on the 24 US dollar Business tier at all.
- Pricing is per creator, so an organisation that wants many occasional contributors pays full price for people who publish twice a year, and in practice content production concentrates on a few seats.
- It competes against Loom and Guidde, which have far larger installed bases and integration ecosystems, so a team standardising on Weet accepts a smaller vendor in a category with heavy consolidation pressure.
- It is not a full learning management system, so an organisation with formal compliance training obligations beyond video completion still needs an LMS alongside it, which undercuts the case for a separate video tool.
Pricing, plan by plan
Skilljar
On request- Skilljar$undefined/year
- Annual enterprise contract, quoted
- Entry point sits well above self-serve course platforms
- Implementation and integration services quoted separately
Weet
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 3 weets
- AI avatars and screen and webcam recording
- Editing tools
- Business$24/month
- Per creator per month billed yearly, 29 US dollars billed monthly
- Unlimited weets per creator
- Interactive annotations
Which should you pick?
Choose Skilljar if
- You need branded course catalogue.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want crm data write-back.
Choose Weet if
- You need screen and webcam recording.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Chrome.
- You also want document to video.
Questions people ask
- Is Skilljar or Weet better?
- Neither clearly leads. Skilljar starts at On request and Weet at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Skilljar or Weet?
- Weet has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Skilljar and Free for Weet.
- Does Skilljar or Weet run on more platforms?
- Skilljar runs on Web, iOS, Android. Weet runs on Web, Chrome.
- Can I use Weet for free?
- Yes. Weet has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Skilljar starts at On request.
- What is Skilljar best used for?
- Skilljar is most often used for a software company whose support ticket volume is driven by customers who were never trained, customer success teams that want training engagement visible next to renewal risk in salesforce, partner certification programmes where credentials must expire and be renewed, reducing time to first value during onboarding by giving customers self serve training before implementation. Of those, a software company whose support ticket volume is driven by customers who were never trained and customer success teams that want training engagement visible next to renewal risk in salesforce are not what Weet is typically brought in for.
- What can Skilljar do that Weet cannot?
- Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue, CRM data write-back, Certification with expiry, Domain and theme control. Weet covers Screen and webcam recording, Document to video, AI avatars, Automatic transcription.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Skilljar: How is Skilljar different from a corporate LMS?
A corporate learning platform reports on employees for compliance. Skilljar reports on customers for retention and expansion, and writes that activity into the CRM so account teams see it.
Weet: Is Weet still operating?
Yes. The site and pricing page are live and maintained, and there is no sunset or shutdown notice.
Skilljar: Do learners need accounts before they can browse?
No. Catalogues can be public so prospects and customers browse and enrol without a sales conversation, which is a large part of the self serve onboarding case.
Weet: What does the free plan include?
Up to three weets with AI avatars, recording, editing and transcription. Three is a very low ceiling, so evaluate on Business.
Skilljar: Is it worth it for a small customer education team?
Usually not at the start. The contract floor assumes an established programme, so prove the value on a cheaper platform and move once retention or revenue evidence exists.
Weet: What is GxP compliance and who needs it?
It is the regulated practice framework used in pharmaceutical and life sciences manufacturing where training records must be auditable. It is on the Enterprise tier only and is the main reason a regulated company would choose Weet.
Weet: Is it a learning management system?
No. It handles video training and quizzes, but formal compliance training programmes need a proper LMS alongside it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Skilljar vs Docebo
- Skilljar vs Absorb LMS
- Skilljar vs LearnWorlds
- Skilljar vs Thought Industries
- Skilljar vs LearnUpon
- Skilljar vs Tovuti LMS
- Skilljar vs Sakai
- Skilljar vs Whatfix
- Skilljar vs Chamilo
- Skilljar vs CYPHER Learning
- Skilljar vs Totara
- Skilljar vs Canvas
- Skilljar vs D2L Brightspace
- Skilljar vs Degreed
- Skilljar vs Echo360
- Skilljar vs Edmodo
- Skilljar vs Edpuzzle
- Skilljar vs iSpring Learn
- Skilljar vs Claroline
- Skilljar vs LearnDash
- Skilljar vs Sana
- Skilljar vs Screencastify
- Skilljar vs LinkedIn Learning
- Skilljar vs Kajabi
- Skilljar vs Teachable
- Skilljar vs Pear Deck
- Skilljar vs Skillshare
- Weet vs Docebo
- Weet vs Absorb LMS
- Weet vs LearnWorlds
- Weet vs Thought Industries
- Weet vs LearnUpon
- Weet vs Tovuti LMS
- Weet vs Sakai
- Weet vs Whatfix
- Weet vs Chamilo
- Weet vs CYPHER Learning
- Weet vs Totara
- Weet vs Canvas
- Weet vs D2L Brightspace
- Weet vs Degreed
- Weet vs Echo360
- Weet vs Edmodo
- Weet vs Edpuzzle
- Weet vs iSpring Learn
- Weet vs Claroline
- Weet vs LearnDash
- Weet vs Sana
- Weet vs Screencastify
- Weet vs LinkedIn Learning
- Weet vs Kajabi
- Weet vs Teachable
- Weet vs Pear Deck
- Weet vs Skillshare
