LMS · head to head
Claroline vs Skilljar

Claroline
LMS
Open source French-language learning platform, now developed as Claroline Connect
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Skilljar
LMS
Customer education platform that treats training completion as a commercial signal in the CRM
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Claroline has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Claroline two products share the name and the abandoned original, last released in December 2021, dominates search results, so institutions regularly install unmaintained software believing it is current.; Skilljar pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
- They diverge on capability: Claroline covers Workspaces, Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Claroline and Skilljar actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (LMS).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Claroline
- Workspaces
- Resource model
- Learning paths
- Quizzes and evaluation
- Competency framework
- Planning and events
- Self-hosting
- SaaS option
Only in Skilljar
- Branded course catalogue
- CRM data write-back
- Certification with expiry
- Domain and theme control
- Self-paced and instructor-led
- Engagement analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Claroline
- A French or Belgian training organisation that needs a francophone platform where the interface and support are French-first rather than translated.not Skilljar
- A public body required to keep learner data on European infrastructure under an open licence it can audit.not Skilljar
- A training provider assembling learning paths from a shared library of reusable resources across many client workspaces rather than duplicating courses.not Skilljar
- An institution already running the abandoned Claroline 13 line that needs to plan a migration onto the maintained Connect codebase before its dependencies become unsupportable.not Skilljar
Skilljar
- A software company whose support ticket volume is driven by customers who were never trainednot Claroline
- Customer success teams that want training engagement visible next to renewal risk in Salesforcenot Claroline
- Partner certification programmes where credentials must expire and be renewednot Claroline
- Reducing time to first value during onboarding by giving customers self serve training before implementationnot Claroline
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Claroline
- Two products share the name and the abandoned original, last released in December 2021, dominates search results, so institutions regularly install unmaintained software believing it is current.
- The community is small compared with Moodle, so plugin choice, third-party integrations and the pool of people who can administer it in production are all thin.
- Documentation and community discussion are French-first and English coverage is partial and inconsistent, which raises the effort for any non-francophone team.
- The commercial hosting is offered by a small operator rather than a large partner network, so an institution depending on paid support has concentrated supplier risk.
- The workspace and resource model is different enough from a conventional course-based LMS that staff moving from Moodle or Canvas have to relearn how content is organised, and migrations do not map cleanly.
Skilljar
- Pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
- The commercial value depends on the Salesforce integration being properly configured, and companies with messy CRM data get engagement reporting joined to accounts that do not reflect reality.
- It is built for external audiences, so using it for internal employee compliance means paying for capability that internal training does not need.
- Content authoring is not a strength, so most customers licence an authoring tool separately and run two content workflows.
- Attribution remains contested. The platform shows that trained accounts renew better, but establishing that training caused the renewal rather than that engaged customers train more is a problem the reporting cannot solve for you.
Pricing, plan by plan
Claroline
Free- Claroline ConnectFree
- GPL licence, no fee
- Full source on GitHub
- You provide Symfony and PHP hosting and operations
- Hosted distribution$undefined/year
- Managed hosting, maintenance and updates
- Support from the commercial operator
- Quoted by user count
Skilljar
On request- Skilljar$undefined/year
- Annual enterprise contract, quoted
- Entry point sits well above self-serve course platforms
- Implementation and integration services quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Claroline if
- You need workspaces.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want resource model.
Choose Skilljar if
- You need branded course catalogue.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want crm data write-back.
Questions people ask
- Is Claroline or Skilljar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Claroline starts at Free and Skilljar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Claroline or Skilljar?
- Claroline has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Claroline and On request for Skilljar.
- Does Claroline or Skilljar run on more platforms?
- Claroline runs on Web, Linux. Skilljar runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Claroline for free?
- Yes. Claroline has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Skilljar starts at On request.
- What is Claroline best used for?
- Claroline is most often used for a french or belgian training organisation that needs a francophone platform where the interface and support are french-first rather than translated., a public body required to keep learner data on european infrastructure under an open licence it can audit., a training provider assembling learning paths from a shared library of reusable resources across many client workspaces rather than duplicating courses., an institution already running the abandoned claroline 13 line that needs to plan a migration onto the maintained connect codebase before its dependencies become unsupportable.. Of those, a french or belgian training organisation that needs a francophone platform where the interface and support are french-first rather than translated. and a public body required to keep learner data on european infrastructure under an open licence it can audit. are not what Skilljar is typically brought in for.
- What can Claroline do that Skilljar cannot?
- Claroline covers Workspaces, Resource model, Learning paths, Quizzes and evaluation. Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue, CRM data write-back, Certification with expiry, Domain and theme control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Claroline: Which Claroline should I install?
Claroline Connect, the Symfony and React codebase currently on version 15. The original PHP Claroline stopped at 13.1.3 in December 2021 and should not be deployed.
Skilljar: How is Skilljar different from a corporate LMS?
A corporate learning platform reports on employees for compliance. Skilljar reports on customers for retention and expansion, and writes that activity into the CRM so account teams see it.
Claroline: Is it still maintained?
Yes. Point releases in the 15.0 line continued into 2026 with active commits on GitHub.
Skilljar: Do learners need accounts before they can browse?
No. Catalogues can be public so prospects and customers browse and enrol without a sales conversation, which is a large part of the self serve onboarding case.
Claroline: Is it free?
The software is GPL and free. Hosted distribution with maintenance and support is a paid service from the commercial operator.
Skilljar: Is it worth it for a small customer education team?
Usually not at the start. The contract floor assumes an established programme, so prove the value on a cheaper platform and move once retention or revenue evidence exists.
Claroline: Does it work in English?
The interface has English, but documentation and community support are French-first, so a non-francophone team will hit gaps.
Claroline: How big is the ecosystem compared to Moodle?
Much smaller. If you need a wide plugin market or an easy administrator hiring pool, Moodle is the safer open source choice.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Claroline vs Sakai
- Claroline vs Moodle
- Claroline vs Docebo
- Claroline vs Chamilo
- Claroline vs Totara
- Claroline vs Canvas
- Claroline vs CYPHER Learning
- Claroline vs Google Classroom
- Claroline vs LearnDash
- Claroline vs Schoox
- Claroline vs Schoology
- Claroline vs Weet
- Claroline vs Cornerstone OnDemand
- Claroline vs D2L Brightspace
- Claroline vs Degreed
- Claroline vs Echo360
- Claroline vs Edmodo
- Claroline vs Absorb LMS
- Claroline vs LearnWorlds
- Claroline vs Thought Industries
- Claroline vs LearnUpon
- Claroline vs Tovuti LMS
- Claroline vs Whatfix
- Claroline vs Edpuzzle
- Claroline vs iSpring Learn
- Skilljar vs Sakai
- Skilljar vs Moodle
- Skilljar vs Docebo
- Skilljar vs Chamilo
- Skilljar vs Totara
- Skilljar vs Canvas
- Skilljar vs CYPHER Learning
- Skilljar vs Google Classroom
- Skilljar vs LearnDash
- Skilljar vs Schoox
- Skilljar vs Schoology
- Skilljar vs Weet
- Skilljar vs Cornerstone OnDemand
- Skilljar vs D2L Brightspace
- Skilljar vs Degreed
- Skilljar vs Echo360
- Skilljar vs Edmodo
- Skilljar vs Absorb LMS
- Skilljar vs LearnWorlds
- Skilljar vs Thought Industries
- Skilljar vs LearnUpon
- Skilljar vs Tovuti LMS
- Skilljar vs Whatfix
- Skilljar vs Edpuzzle
- Skilljar vs iSpring Learn
