Insurance · head to head
Verisk vs Vertafore Content

Verisk
Insurance
Insurance data, ISO forms and rating content that most American P&C products are built on
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Vertafore Content
Insurance
Digital content and marketing solution for agencies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Verisk the ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.; Vertafore Content the Internet Archive's capture of Vertafore's homepage on 31 December 2019 named the vendor's Content Management & Workflow category as ImageRight and WorkSmart, distinct products from a generic 'Vertafore Content' name, sold via demo request with no price figure published.
- They diverge on capability: Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content, Vertafore Content covers Content management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Verisk and Vertafore Content actually diverge.
| Attribute | Verisk | Vertafore Content |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, API, Windows | Web |
| Founded | Unknown | 1969 |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Verisk
- ISO forms and rating content
- ClaimSearch
- Extreme event models
- Property data
- Xactimate
- Underwriting analytics
Only in Vertafore Content
- Content management
- Email marketing
- Landing page builder
- Analytics
- Template library
- Mobile responsive
- SEO optimization
- Integration tools
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Verisk
- A carrier filing standard commercial lines products that must use recognised forms and loss costsnot Vertafore Content
- A claims organisation checking submitted claims against the industry database for prior activitynot Vertafore Content
- A property insurer pricing catastrophe exposure for reinsurance placementnot Vertafore Content
- An MGA that needs bureau content without building and filing proprietary forms in every statenot Vertafore Content
Vertafore Content
- Digital marketingnot Verisk
- Content creationnot Verisk
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Verisk
- The ISO content has no real substitute for a carrier writing standard lines, so renewal negotiations start from a position where walking away is not credible.
- Pricing is negotiated separately per product and per line, and large insurers routinely find overlapping agreements across underwriting, claims and actuarial that nobody had counted together.
- Circular updates to forms and loss costs must be loaded into your policy system on a schedule, which is recurring work that carriers with older platforms do partly by hand.
- The breadth of the portfolio means account management is spread across product teams, so a problem in one service does not necessarily get attention from the people selling you another.
- Usage-based components such as data prefill and claims searches make annual spend hard to forecast, and the variance lands in the year you grow fastest.
Vertafore Content
- The Internet Archive's capture of Vertafore's homepage on 31 December 2019 named the vendor's Content Management & Workflow category as ImageRight and WorkSmart, distinct products from a generic 'Vertafore Content' name, sold via demo request with no price figure published.
Pricing, plan by plan
Verisk
On request- Verisk Insurance Solutions$undefined/year
- ISO forms and loss cost licensing
- Data and analytics services by line
- API access
Vertafore Content
On request- Standard$undefined/month
- Content management
- Email marketing
- Landing pages
Which should you pick?
Choose Verisk if
- You need iso forms and rating content.
- You work on Web, API, Windows.
- You also want claimsearch.
Choose Vertafore Content if
- You need content management.
- You also want email marketing.
Questions people ask
- Is Verisk or Vertafore Content better?
- Neither clearly leads. Verisk starts at On request and Vertafore Content at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Verisk or Vertafore Content?
- Verisk starts at On request and Vertafore Content at On request.
- Does Verisk or Vertafore Content run on more platforms?
- Verisk runs on Web, API, Windows. Vertafore Content runs on Web.
- What is Verisk best used for?
- Verisk is most often used for a carrier filing standard commercial lines products that must use recognised forms and loss costs, a claims organisation checking submitted claims against the industry database for prior activity, a property insurer pricing catastrophe exposure for reinsurance placement, an mga that needs bureau content without building and filing proprietary forms in every state. Of those, a carrier filing standard commercial lines products that must use recognised forms and loss costs and a claims organisation checking submitted claims against the industry database for prior activity are not what Vertafore Content is typically brought in for.
- What can Verisk do that Vertafore Content cannot?
- Verisk covers ISO forms and rating content, ClaimSearch, Extreme event models, Property data. Vertafore Content covers Content management, Email marketing, Landing page builder, Analytics.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Verisk: Can a carrier avoid ISO content entirely?
Only by developing and filing proprietary forms and rates, which a handful of large insurers do. For everyone else the filing and legal cost of independence exceeds the licence.
Verisk: Is Xactimate part of Verisk?
Yes. It came with the Xactware acquisition and is the dominant property claims estimating tool in North America, used by carriers and by the contractors they pay.
Verisk: Did Verisk sell off businesses?
Yes. It divested non-insurance units including its energy research business in 2023 and refocused on insurance data and analytics.
Related pages
More on Vertafore Content
Other head to heads
- Verisk vs Origami Risk
- Verisk vs TurboRater
- Verisk vs EZLynx
- Verisk vs INSTANDA
- Verisk vs InsurancePro
- Verisk vs Ivans
- Verisk vs BriteCore
- Verisk vs Socotra
- Verisk vs Insurity Suite
- Verisk vs EIS Group
- Verisk vs Jenesis Software
- Verisk vs Novidea
- Verisk vs Hippo
- Verisk vs InsuredMine
- Verisk vs Insureon
- Verisk vs Indio
- Verisk vs Duck Creek Policy
- Verisk vs Duck Creek
- Verisk vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Verisk vs HawkSoft
- Verisk vs AgencyBloc
- Verisk vs Majesco
- Verisk vs AgencyZoom
- Verisk vs Snapsheet Claims
- Verisk vs Bolt Solutions
- Verisk vs Splice Software
- Verisk vs Tarmika
- Verisk vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Verisk vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Vertafore Content vs Origami Risk
- Vertafore Content vs TurboRater
- Vertafore Content vs EZLynx
- Vertafore Content vs INSTANDA
- Vertafore Content vs InsurancePro
- Vertafore Content vs Ivans
- Vertafore Content vs BriteCore
- Vertafore Content vs Socotra
- Vertafore Content vs Insurity Suite
- Vertafore Content vs EIS Group
- Vertafore Content vs Jenesis Software
- Vertafore Content vs Novidea
- Vertafore Content vs Hippo
- Vertafore Content vs InsuredMine
- Vertafore Content vs Insureon
- Vertafore Content vs Indio
- Vertafore Content vs Duck Creek Policy
- Vertafore Content vs Duck Creek
- Vertafore Content vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Vertafore Content vs HawkSoft
- Vertafore Content vs AgencyBloc
- Vertafore Content vs Majesco
- Vertafore Content vs AgencyZoom
- Vertafore Content vs Snapsheet Claims
- Vertafore Content vs Bolt Solutions
- Vertafore Content vs Splice Software
- Vertafore Content vs Tarmika
- Vertafore Content vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Vertafore Content vs Majesco Policy for L&A
