Marketing · head to head
Bloomreach vs Umami

Bloomreach
Marketing
Ecommerce search, merchandising and customer engagement sold as three separately bought products
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Umami
Marketing
Open source, cookie-free web analytics you can self-host for the cost of a database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Umami has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Bloomreach the three products have separate origins, separate pricing units and separate onboarding, so a single bundled quote hides which parts you are actually committing to.; Umami there is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- They diverge on capability: Bloomreach covers Engagement CDP, Umami covers Cookie-free tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bloomreach and Umami actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bloomreach | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per month by event count |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, REST API | Web, Linux |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bloomreach
- Engagement CDP
- Campaign orchestration
- Discovery search
- Recommendations
- Jinja templating
- Reports and dashboards
Only in Umami
- Cookie-free tracking
- Self-hosting
- Small tracking script
- Custom events
- Funnels and goals
- Multi-site and teams
- Public dashboards
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bloomreach
- A retailer replacing a legacy ESP that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sendingnot Umami
- Merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion levernot Umami
- Building weblayers and email content from the same customer profile without duplicating logic in two toolsnot Umami
- Running campaign analytics over raw events instead of exporting to a separate warehouse and BI stacknot Umami
Umami
- A developer who wants traffic numbers on a personal or client site without adding a consent bannernot Bloomreach
- An organisation whose legal or procurement team has ruled out sending visitor data to a US advertising companynot Bloomreach
- A high-traffic site where hosted analytics priced by pageview band has become expensive and self-hosting removes the ceiling entirelynot Bloomreach
- A team that wants analytics data in a database they already control so they can query and join it themselvesnot Bloomreach
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bloomreach
- The three products have separate origins, separate pricing units and separate onboarding, so a single bundled quote hides which parts you are actually committing to.
- Engagement is priced on tracked profiles, so a customer database that keeps every inactive account raises the bill whether or not those people are ever messaged.
- The flexibility of the data model and Jinja templating needs technical ownership, and marketing teams without a developer typically use a fraction of the product they pay for.
- Content is the least invested of the three lines and buyers evaluating it against dedicated headless CMS vendors usually find the gap widening.
- Support and implementation quality vary between the Bratislava engineering base for Engagement and the US organisation, and escalation paths differ by product.
Umami
- There is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Self-hosting is only free in licence terms; you own the database, the upgrades, the backups and the query performance at scale, and a busy site's events table grows quickly enough to need real attention.
- Because it stores no persistent identifier, it cannot follow a user across devices or sessions in any meaningful way, which makes returning-visitor and lifetime-value questions unanswerable by design rather than by omission.
- Cloud overage is billed per event beyond the plan allowance, so a traffic spike or a badly instrumented custom event can produce a bill materially above the $20 or $200 headline before anyone notices.
- It is maintained by a small team, so the pace of new capability is modest and enterprise expectations such as SSO, granular role permissions and formal support agreements are limited compared with commercial analytics vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Bloomreach
On request- Bloomreach Engagement$undefined/year
- Priced by tracked customer profiles and event volume
- Channels and AI modules licensed separately
- Annual contract
- Bloomreach Discovery$undefined/year
- Priced by search and recommendation request volume
- Catalogue size and traffic bands
- Annual contract
Umami
Free- Self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- No event limit imposed by the software
- Unlimited websites and users
- Cloud HobbyFree
- Up to 100,000 events per month
- 3 websites
- 6 months data retention
- Cloud Pro$20/month
- Up to 1,000,000 events per month
- Unlimited websites
- Unlimited team members
- Cloud Business$200/month
- Up to 10,000,000 events per month
- All Pro features
- Higher volume overage rate
Which should you pick?
Choose Bloomreach if
- You need engagement cdp.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, REST API.
- You also want campaign orchestration.
Choose Umami if
- You need cookie-free tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want self-hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is Bloomreach or Umami better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bloomreach starts at On request and Umami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bloomreach or Umami?
- Umami has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Bloomreach and Free for Umami.
- Does Bloomreach or Umami run on more platforms?
- Bloomreach runs on Web, iOS, Android, REST API. Umami runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Umami for free?
- Yes. Umami has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Bloomreach starts at On request.
- What is Bloomreach best used for?
- Bloomreach is most often used for a retailer replacing a legacy esp that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sending, merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion lever, building weblayers and email content from the same customer profile without duplicating logic in two tools, running campaign analytics over raw events instead of exporting to a separate warehouse and bi stack. Of those, a retailer replacing a legacy esp that needs event-level segmentation rather than list-based sending and merchandising a large catalogue where site search relevance is the main conversion lever are not what Umami is typically brought in for.
- What can Bloomreach do that Umami cannot?
- Bloomreach covers Engagement CDP, Campaign orchestration, Discovery search, Recommendations. Umami covers Cookie-free tracking, Self-hosting, Small tracking script, Custom events.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bloomreach: Is Engagement just Exponea renamed?
It is the Exponea product line, continued and extended after the 2021 acquisition, with its engineering still centred in Slovakia. Buying it standalone is common.
Umami: Is Umami really free?
Self-hosted, yes; it is MIT licensed with no event cap. You pay for the server and database. Umami Cloud has a free tier at 100,000 events a month and paid tiers from $20.
Bloomreach: Do we have to take Discovery to get Engagement?
No. They are sold and priced separately, and plenty of customers run Engagement alongside a different search vendor.
Umami: Do I need a cookie consent banner?
For Umami analytics specifically, generally no, because it sets no cookies and stores no personal data. Other tags on your site may still require one.
Bloomreach: How is it priced?
Engagement by tracked profiles and event volume, Discovery by request volume. Neither is published, and both are annual commitments.
Umami: Can it replace Google Analytics?
For traffic, referrers and event counts, yes. For attribution modelling, audiences and advertising integration, no.
Umami: What does it need to run?
A container and a PostgreSQL or MySQL database. Most people deploy it on infrastructure they already pay for.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bloomreach vs Customer.io
- Bloomreach vs Insider
- Bloomreach vs Netcore Cloud
- Bloomreach vs Mautic
- Bloomreach vs WebEngage
- Bloomreach vs Freshpaint
- Bloomreach vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Bloomreach vs CleverTap
- Bloomreach vs Optimove
- Bloomreach vs Buffer
- Bloomreach vs Hootsuite
- Bloomreach vs Iterable
- Bloomreach vs Funnel.io
- Bloomreach vs Google Optimize
- Bloomreach vs Improvado
- Bloomreach vs Instapage
- Bloomreach vs Matomo
- Bloomreach vs Plausible
- Bloomreach vs Fathom Analytics
- Bloomreach vs Countly
- Bloomreach vs Simple Analytics
- Bloomreach vs Attribution
- Bloomreach vs CallRail
- Bloomreach vs Microsoft Clarity
- Bloomreach vs Octoboard
- Bloomreach vs Onclusive
- Bloomreach vs Woopra
- Bloomreach vs Wunderkind
- Bloomreach vs Whatagraph
- Bloomreach vs MoEngage
- Bloomreach vs Optimizely
- Umami vs Customer.io
- Umami vs Insider
- Umami vs Netcore Cloud
- Umami vs Mautic
- Umami vs WebEngage
- Umami vs Freshpaint
- Umami vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Umami vs CleverTap
- Umami vs Optimove
- Umami vs Buffer
- Umami vs Hootsuite
- Umami vs Iterable
- Umami vs Funnel.io
- Umami vs Google Optimize
- Umami vs Improvado
- Umami vs Instapage
- Umami vs Matomo
- Umami vs Plausible
- Umami vs Fathom Analytics
- Umami vs Countly
- Umami vs Simple Analytics
- Umami vs Attribution
- Umami vs CallRail
- Umami vs Microsoft Clarity
- Umami vs Octoboard
- Umami vs Onclusive
- Umami vs Woopra
- Umami vs Wunderkind
- Umami vs Whatagraph
- Umami vs MoEngage
- Umami vs Optimizely
