Marketing · head to head
Iterable vs Umami

Iterable
Marketing
The AI customer engagement platform global brands trust to create experiences that drive growth…
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Umami
Marketing
Open source, cookie-free web analytics you can self-host for the cost of a database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Umami has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Iterable no pricing information published on their site - contact sales required; Umami there is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Iterable and Umami actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Iterable
Nothing recorded that Umami does not also cover.
Only in Umami
- Cookie-free tracking
- Self-hosting
- Small tracking script
- Custom events
- Funnels and goals
- Multi-site and teams
- Public dashboards
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Iterable
- Personalizing customer journeys across all channelsnot Umami
- Optimizing retention through lifecycle messagingnot Umami
- Driving upsells with intelligent segmentationnot Umami
- Adapting campaigns based on real-time behaviornot Umami
Umami
- A developer who wants traffic numbers on a personal or client site without adding a consent bannernot Iterable
- An organisation whose legal or procurement team has ruled out sending visitor data to a US advertising companynot Iterable
- A high-traffic site where hosted analytics priced by pageview band has become expensive and self-hosting removes the ceiling entirelynot Iterable
- A team that wants analytics data in a database they already control so they can query and join it themselvesnot Iterable
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Iterable
- no pricing information published on their site - contact sales required
Umami
- There is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Self-hosting is only free in licence terms; you own the database, the upgrades, the backups and the query performance at scale, and a busy site's events table grows quickly enough to need real attention.
- Because it stores no persistent identifier, it cannot follow a user across devices or sessions in any meaningful way, which makes returning-visitor and lifetime-value questions unanswerable by design rather than by omission.
- Cloud overage is billed per event beyond the plan allowance, so a traffic spike or a badly instrumented custom event can produce a bill materially above the $20 or $200 headline before anyone notices.
- It is maintained by a small team, so the pace of new capability is modest and enterprise expectations such as SSO, granular role permissions and formal support agreements are limited compared with commercial analytics vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Iterable
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Iterable review.
Umami
Free- Self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- No event limit imposed by the software
- Unlimited websites and users
- Cloud HobbyFree
- Up to 100,000 events per month
- 3 websites
- 6 months data retention
- Cloud Pro$20/month
- Up to 1,000,000 events per month
- Unlimited websites
- Unlimited team members
- Cloud Business$200/month
- Up to 10,000,000 events per month
- All Pro features
- Higher volume overage rate
Which should you pick?
Choose Iterable if
Nothing in the data separates Iterable from Umami on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Umami if
- You need cookie-free tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want self-hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is Iterable or Umami better?
- Neither clearly leads. Iterable starts at On request and Umami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Iterable or Umami?
- Umami has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Iterable and Free for Umami.
- Does Iterable or Umami run on more platforms?
- Iterable runs on Web. Umami runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Umami for free?
- Yes. Umami has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Iterable starts at On request.
- What is Iterable best used for?
- Iterable is most often used for personalizing customer journeys across all channels, optimizing retention through lifecycle messaging, driving upsells with intelligent segmentation, adapting campaigns based on real-time behavior. Of those, personalizing customer journeys across all channels and optimizing retention through lifecycle messaging are not what Umami is typically brought in for.
- What can Iterable do that Umami cannot?
- Umami covers Cookie-free tracking, Self-hosting, Small tracking script, Custom events.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Iterable: How much does Iterable cost?
Iterable does not publish pricing on their website. Interested customers must contact their sales team, book a demo, or request a quote through their website for pricing information.
SourceUmami: Is Umami really free?
Self-hosted, yes; it is MIT licensed with no event cap. You pay for the server and database. Umami Cloud has a free tier at 100,000 events a month and paid tiers from $20.
Umami: Do I need a cookie consent banner?
For Umami analytics specifically, generally no, because it sets no cookies and stores no personal data. Other tags on your site may still require one.
Umami: Can it replace Google Analytics?
For traffic, referrers and event counts, yes. For attribution modelling, audiences and advertising integration, no.
Umami: What does it need to run?
A container and a PostgreSQL or MySQL database. Most people deploy it on infrastructure they already pay for.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Iterable vs WebEngage
- Iterable vs Wrike
- Iterable vs Hootsuite
- Iterable vs Optimove
- Iterable vs Wunderkind
- Iterable vs Buffer
- Iterable vs Moz
- Iterable vs MoEngage
- Iterable vs Customer.io
- Iterable vs Northbeam
- Iterable vs CleverTap
- Iterable vs Netcore Cloud
- Iterable vs Woopra
- Iterable vs Optimizely
- Iterable vs Vimeo
- Iterable vs Matomo
- Iterable vs Plausible
- Iterable vs Fathom Analytics
- Iterable vs Mautic
- Iterable vs Countly
- Iterable vs Freshpaint
- Iterable vs Simple Analytics
- Iterable vs Attribution
- Iterable vs CallRail
- Iterable vs Microsoft Clarity
- Iterable vs Octoboard
- Iterable vs Onclusive
- Iterable vs Whatagraph
- Umami vs WebEngage
- Umami vs Wrike
- Umami vs Hootsuite
- Umami vs Optimove
- Umami vs Wunderkind
- Umami vs Buffer
- Umami vs Moz
- Umami vs MoEngage
- Umami vs Customer.io
- Umami vs Northbeam
- Umami vs CleverTap
- Umami vs Netcore Cloud
- Umami vs Woopra
- Umami vs Optimizely
- Umami vs Vimeo
- Umami vs Matomo
- Umami vs Plausible
- Umami vs Fathom Analytics
- Umami vs Mautic
- Umami vs Countly
- Umami vs Freshpaint
- Umami vs Simple Analytics
- Umami vs Attribution
- Umami vs CallRail
- Umami vs Microsoft Clarity
- Umami vs Octoboard
- Umami vs Onclusive
- Umami vs Whatagraph
