Backup · head to head
HYCU vs Trilio

HYCU
Backup
Backup as a service spanning SaaS applications as well as infrastructure
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Trilio
Backup
Backup and recovery for OpenStack, Kubernetes and Red Hat Virtualization
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Trilio has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: HYCU pricing is quoted with different billing units for different services, so an estate spanning virtual machines, cloud and SaaS is billed three ways and annual forecasting becomes guesswork.; Trilio coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- They diverge on capability: HYCU covers R-Cloud platform, Trilio covers OpenStack backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HYCU and Trilio actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HYCU
- R-Cloud platform
- SaaS application backup
- Nutanix and VMware backup
- Cloud infrastructure backup
- R-Graph
- Development kit
- Immutable backup targets
Only in Trilio
- OpenStack backup
- Kubernetes backup
- OpenShift Virtualization
- Open format backups
- Incremental forever
- Self-service restore
- Free basic edition
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HYCU
- An organisation that has just realised its Okta, Jira and GitHub data is not covered by any backup product it ownsnot Trilio
- A Nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machinesnot Trilio
- A mid-market IT team wanting one vendor across on premises virtual machines, cloud workloads and SaaS applicationsnot Trilio
- Building an immutable off-site copy with object lock to satisfy a cyber insurance requirementnot Trilio
Trilio
- A telco running an OpenStack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agentsnot HYCU
- An organisation migrating virtual machines from VMware to OpenShift Virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day onenot HYCU
- A research institution protecting tenant workloads where each tenant should restore its own data without a ticketnot HYCU
- A platform team wanting to evaluate Kubernetes backup properly on ten nodes before committing budgetnot HYCU
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HYCU
- Pricing is quoted with different billing units for different services, so an estate spanning virtual machines, cloud and SaaS is billed three ways and annual forecasting becomes guesswork.
- Backup storage and cloud egress on restore are billed by your cloud provider rather than by HYCU, which means the recovery cost of a large incident appears on a different invoice and is rarely modelled in advance.
- SaaS integration depth varies considerably by application, and a source appearing on the supported list does not guarantee that every object type within it is captured; verify the specific data you need.
- Integrations built with the development kit may come from partners rather than HYCU, so the support path for a given source is worth establishing before you rely on it.
- The product's Nutanix heritage still shows in feature depth, and organisations with predominantly VMware or physical estates often find the incumbent backup vendors more mature for those workloads.
Trilio
- Coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- Trilio is a small vendor next to the backup incumbents, and buyers with ten year retention obligations should assess the risk of the company being acquired or wound down.
- Enterprise pricing is per node or per virtual machine and is not published, which makes it hard to compare against per-terabyte competitors without going through sales.
- The free basic edition stops at ten nodes with community support only, so the step from evaluation to production is a full commercial negotiation rather than a tier upgrade.
- Restore performance depends on the object storage or NFS target you supply, and egress charges from a cloud object store during a large recovery sit outside the vendor quote entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
HYCU
On request- HYCU R-Cloud$undefined/year
- Consumption pricing by virtual machine, tebibyte or gibibyte depending on service
- Different units for different data sources under one agreement
- Cloud storage target costs billed separately by your provider
Trilio
Free- Basic EditionFree
- Up to ten nodes
- No time limit
- Community support only
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/year
- Priced per node or per virtual machine annually
- No scale limits
- OpenStack, Kubernetes, OpenShift and Red Hat Virtualization
Which should you pick?
Choose HYCU if
- You need r-cloud platform.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want saas application backup.
Choose Trilio if
- You need openstack backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want kubernetes backup.
Questions people ask
- Is HYCU or Trilio better?
- Neither clearly leads. HYCU starts at On request and Trilio at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HYCU or Trilio?
- Trilio has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for HYCU and Free for Trilio.
- Does HYCU or Trilio run on more platforms?
- HYCU runs on Web, Linux, Windows. Trilio runs on Linux, Web.
- Can I use Trilio for free?
- Yes. Trilio has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. HYCU starts at On request.
- What is HYCU best used for?
- HYCU is most often used for an organisation that has just realised its okta, jira and github data is not covered by any backup product it owns, a nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machines, a mid-market it team wanting one vendor across on premises virtual machines, cloud workloads and saas applications, building an immutable off-site copy with object lock to satisfy a cyber insurance requirement. Of those, an organisation that has just realised its okta, jira and github data is not covered by any backup product it owns and a nutanix environment needing agentless backup that understands the platform rather than treating it as generic virtual machines are not what Trilio is typically brought in for.
- What can HYCU do that Trilio cannot?
- HYCU covers R-Cloud platform, SaaS application backup, Nutanix and VMware backup, Cloud infrastructure backup. Trilio covers OpenStack backup, Kubernetes backup, OpenShift Virtualization, Open format backups.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HYCU: Is pricing published?
No. It is consumption based by virtual machine, tebibyte or gibibyte depending on the service, and quoted. Ask specifically which unit applies to each data source in your estate.
Trilio: Is the free edition production usable?
It is functionally complete up to ten nodes with community support only. Use it to evaluate, but understand that production incidents have no vendor behind them at that tier.
HYCU: Does it really back up SaaS applications?
Yes, that is the main differentiator, with a long supported source list. Confirm the depth of coverage for the specific objects you need in each application.
Trilio: Does it support OpenShift Virtualization?
Yes, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists for organisations moving virtual machines off VMware.
HYCU: Who holds the encryption keys?
Ask directly and get it in writing. Key custody differs by deployment model and it determines whether you can render backup copies unreadable independently of the vendor.
Trilio: Where are backups stored?
On NFS or S3-compatible object storage you provide, in an open format rather than a proprietary vendor container.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- HYCU vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- HYCU vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- HYCU vs Portworx Backup
- HYCU vs Velero
- HYCU vs BDRShield
- HYCU vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- HYCU vs CloudCasa
- HYCU vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- HYCU vs Spanning Backup
- HYCU vs Keepit
- HYCU vs Rewind
- HYCU vs Cohesity
- HYCU vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- HYCU vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- HYCU vs IBM Storage Protect
- HYCU vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- HYCU vs Macrium Reflect
- HYCU vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- HYCU vs Kopia
- HYCU vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- HYCU vs Proxmox Backup Server
- HYCU vs Redstor
- HYCU vs rustic
- HYCU vs HPE StoreOnce
- HYCU vs MSP360 Backup
- HYCU vs N-able Backup
- HYCU vs OwnBackup
- Trilio vs Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
- Trilio vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Trilio vs Portworx Backup
- Trilio vs Velero
- Trilio vs BDRShield
- Trilio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Trilio vs CloudCasa
- Trilio vs AvePoint Cloud Backup
- Trilio vs Spanning Backup
- Trilio vs Keepit
- Trilio vs Rewind
- Trilio vs Cohesity
- Trilio vs Dell EMC NetWorker
- Trilio vs EaseUS Todo Backup
- Trilio vs IBM Storage Protect
- Trilio vs Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery
- Trilio vs Macrium Reflect
- Trilio vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Trilio vs Kopia
- Trilio vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Trilio vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Trilio vs Redstor
- Trilio vs rustic
- Trilio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Trilio vs MSP360 Backup
- Trilio vs N-able Backup
- Trilio vs OwnBackup
