Backup · head to head
IBM Storage Protect vs Trilio

IBM Storage Protect
Backup
Enterprise-scale data protection platform
- From
- $100/month
- Rated
- -

Trilio
Backup
Backup and recovery for OpenStack, Kubernetes and Red Hat Virtualization
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Trilio has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: IBM Storage Protect iBM United Kingdom Limited lists IBM Storage Protect for Cloud (Microsoft 365 edition) on G-Cloud 14 at £50.64 per user per year; Trilio coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- They diverge on capability: IBM Storage Protect covers Progressive incremental backup, Trilio covers OpenStack backup.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM Storage Protect and Trilio actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM Storage Protect | Trilio |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $100/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | Per node per year |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, Web | Linux, Web |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Backup).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM Storage Protect
- Progressive incremental backup
- Policy-based management
- Container protection
- Kubernetes support
- Data deduplication
- Instant restore
- VMware
- Hyper-V
Only in Trilio
- OpenStack backup
- Kubernetes backup
- OpenShift Virtualization
- Open format backups
- Incremental forever
- Self-service restore
- Free basic edition
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM Storage Protect
- Data protectionnot Trilio
- Disaster recoverynot Trilio
- Business continuitynot Trilio
- Ransomware protectionnot Trilio
- Compliancenot Trilio
Trilio
- A telco running an OpenStack cloud whose incumbent backup vendor supports it only through generic agentsnot IBM Storage Protect
- An organisation migrating virtual machines from VMware to OpenShift Virtualization and needing protection on the new platform from day onenot IBM Storage Protect
- A research institution protecting tenant workloads where each tenant should restore its own data without a ticketnot IBM Storage Protect
- A platform team wanting to evaluate Kubernetes backup properly on ten nodes before committing budgetnot IBM Storage Protect
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM Storage Protect
- IBM United Kingdom Limited lists IBM Storage Protect for Cloud (Microsoft 365 edition) on G-Cloud 14 at £50.64 per user per year
Trilio
- Coverage is deliberately narrow, so a mixed estate with VMware and physical servers needs a second backup product and two sets of restore procedures.
- Trilio is a small vendor next to the backup incumbents, and buyers with ten year retention obligations should assess the risk of the company being acquired or wound down.
- Enterprise pricing is per node or per virtual machine and is not published, which makes it hard to compare against per-terabyte competitors without going through sales.
- The free basic edition stops at ten nodes with community support only, so the step from evaluation to production is a full commercial negotiation rather than a tier upgrade.
- Restore performance depends on the object storage or NFS target you supply, and egress charges from a cloud object store during a large recovery sit outside the vendor quote entirely.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM Storage Protect
$100/month- Storage Protect$100/month
- Progressive incremental
- Container support
- Policy automation
Trilio
Free- Basic EditionFree
- Up to ten nodes
- No time limit
- Community support only
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/year
- Priced per node or per virtual machine annually
- No scale limits
- OpenStack, Kubernetes, OpenShift and Red Hat Virtualization
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM Storage Protect if
- You need progressive incremental backup.
- You work on Windows, Linux, Web.
- You also want policy-based management.
Choose Trilio if
- You need openstack backup.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Web.
- You also want kubernetes backup.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM Storage Protect or Trilio better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM Storage Protect starts at $100/month and Trilio at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM Storage Protect or Trilio?
- Trilio has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $100/month for IBM Storage Protect and Free for Trilio.
- Does IBM Storage Protect or Trilio run on more platforms?
- IBM Storage Protect runs on Windows, Linux, Web. Trilio runs on Linux, Web.
- Can I use Trilio for free?
- Yes. Trilio has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. IBM Storage Protect starts at $100/month.
- What is IBM Storage Protect best used for?
- IBM Storage Protect is most often used for data protection, disaster recovery, business continuity, ransomware protection. Of those, data protection and disaster recovery are not what Trilio is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM Storage Protect do that Trilio cannot?
- IBM Storage Protect covers Progressive incremental backup, Policy-based management, Container protection, Kubernetes support. Trilio covers OpenStack backup, Kubernetes backup, OpenShift Virtualization, Open format backups.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Trilio: Is the free edition production usable?
It is functionally complete up to ten nodes with community support only. Use it to evaluate, but understand that production incidents have no vendor behind them at that tier.
Trilio: Does it support OpenShift Virtualization?
Yes, which is the main reason it appears on shortlists for organisations moving virtual machines off VMware.
Trilio: Where are backups stored?
On NFS or S3-compatible object storage you provide, in an open format rather than a proprietary vendor container.
Related pages
More on IBM Storage Protect
Other head to heads
- IBM Storage Protect vs CloudAlly
- IBM Storage Protect vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- IBM Storage Protect vs Backupify
- IBM Storage Protect vs Spanning Backup
- IBM Storage Protect vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- IBM Storage Protect vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- IBM Storage Protect vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- IBM Storage Protect vs Quest NetVault Backup
- IBM Storage Protect vs Cohesity DataProtect
- IBM Storage Protect vs OwnBackup
- IBM Storage Protect vs Amanda Enterprise
- IBM Storage Protect vs Arcserve UDP
- IBM Storage Protect vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- IBM Storage Protect vs Proxmox Backup Server
- IBM Storage Protect vs Redstor
- IBM Storage Protect vs rustic
- IBM Storage Protect vs Velero
- IBM Storage Protect vs Portworx Backup
- IBM Storage Protect vs HYCU
- IBM Storage Protect vs BDRShield
- IBM Storage Protect vs CloudCasa
- IBM Storage Protect vs Kopia
- IBM Storage Protect vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- IBM Storage Protect vs HPE StoreOnce
- IBM Storage Protect vs MSP360 Backup
- IBM Storage Protect vs N-able Backup
- Trilio vs CloudAlly
- Trilio vs Acronis Cyber Protect
- Trilio vs Backupify
- Trilio vs Spanning Backup
- Trilio vs Commvault Complete Data Protection
- Trilio vs Rubrik Cloud Data Management
- Trilio vs Micro Focus Data Protector
- Trilio vs Quest NetVault Backup
- Trilio vs Cohesity DataProtect
- Trilio vs OwnBackup
- Trilio vs Amanda Enterprise
- Trilio vs Arcserve UDP
- Trilio vs Paragon Backup & Recovery
- Trilio vs Proxmox Backup Server
- Trilio vs Redstor
- Trilio vs rustic
- Trilio vs Velero
- Trilio vs Portworx Backup
- Trilio vs HYCU
- Trilio vs BDRShield
- Trilio vs CloudCasa
- Trilio vs Kopia
- Trilio vs Veeam Kasten for Kubernetes
- Trilio vs HPE StoreOnce
- Trilio vs MSP360 Backup
- Trilio vs N-able Backup
