Cybersecurity · head to head
Transmit Security vs Trimble Unity Maintain

Transmit Security
Cybersecurity
Customer identity platform built around passwordless and fraud signals
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Trimble Unity Maintain
Government
GIS-centric public asset and work management, the product formerly sold as Cityworks
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Transmit Security pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.; Trimble Unity Maintain esri ArcGIS is a hard prerequisite, so an organisation without it faces a second substantial licence and a GIS programme before the maintenance system can be used at all.
- They diverge on capability: Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Trimble Unity Maintain covers Built on ArcGIS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Transmit Security and Trimble Unity Maintain actually diverge.
| Attribute | Transmit Security | Trimble Unity Maintain |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Transmit Security
- Passwordless authentication
- Detection and response
- Identity verification
- Orchestration
- Account recovery
- Bot and automation detection
- Composable APIs
Only in Trimble Unity Maintain
- Built on ArcGIS
- Service requests
- Work order management
- Permits and licensing
- Mobile field access
- Storeroom and inventory
- Operational Insights
- AgileAssets convergence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Transmit Security
- A bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration stepnot Trimble Unity Maintain
- An insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside itnot Trimble Unity Maintain
- A retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkoutnot Trimble Unity Maintain
- An organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liabilitynot Trimble Unity Maintain
Trimble Unity Maintain
- A water utility wanting valve exercising and hydrant flushing recorded against the same GIS features the engineering team maintainsnot Transmit Security
- A city consolidating a citizen service request line, work orders and inspections into one location-based systemnot Transmit Security
- A state transportation department managing pavement and bridge assets with linear referencing rather than point assetsnot Transmit Security
- A public works department that has already licensed ArcGIS Enterprise and wants to avoid rekeying its asset inventorynot Transmit Security
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Transmit Security
- Pricing is not published, so it cannot be compared early against competitors that post per monthly active user rates, and the eventual quote often mixes per-user and per-transaction units.
- Migrating a live consumer identity base is a high risk project, and credential migration constraints mean some users must re-register, which shows up as measurable churn.
- The vendor is smaller than the identity incumbents, so the partner and systems integrator pool is thinner and staffing a large programme is harder.
- Workforce identity is not the focus, so an organisation wanting one vendor for employees and customers will still run two platforms.
- The fraud detection value depends on traffic volume feeding the models, so a smaller deployment gets less benefit from exactly the capability that justified choosing it over a plain identity provider.
Trimble Unity Maintain
- Esri ArcGIS is a hard prerequisite, so an organisation without it faces a second substantial licence and a GIS programme before the maintenance system can be used at all.
- The product is mid-rename from Cityworks to Trimble Unity Maintain with transition timelines Trimble has not committed to publicly, leaving contracts, documentation and integrator experience split between two names.
- CVE-2025-0994, a deserialisation flaw in Cityworks, was exploited in the wild and listed by CISA in February 2025, which makes on-premise deployments a patching obligation rather than a set-and-forget install.
- Because assets live in the GIS, changing the asset model is a GIS division change, so maintenance teams cannot restructure their own hierarchy without another department in the loop.
- It is built for North American public sector practice, and the permitting, funding source and reporting models do not map cleanly onto other countries or onto private industrial estates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Transmit Security
On request- Transmit Security Platform$undefined/year
- Priced per monthly active user or per transaction by service
- Services licensed individually or as a platform
- Free developer tier for evaluation
Trimble Unity Maintain
On request- Trimble Unity Maintain$undefined/year
- Annual subscription sized by population served, asset volume and user count
- Esri ArcGIS Enterprise or ArcGIS Online licensing required separately
- Hosted and on-premise deployment priced differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Transmit Security if
- You need passwordless authentication.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want detection and response.
Choose Trimble Unity Maintain if
- You need built on arcgis.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want service requests.
Questions people ask
- Is Transmit Security or Trimble Unity Maintain better?
- Neither clearly leads. Transmit Security starts at On request and Trimble Unity Maintain at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Transmit Security or Trimble Unity Maintain?
- Transmit Security starts at On request and Trimble Unity Maintain at On request.
- Does Transmit Security or Trimble Unity Maintain run on more platforms?
- Transmit Security runs on Web, iOS, Android. Trimble Unity Maintain runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- What is Transmit Security best used for?
- Transmit Security is most often used for a bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration step, an insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside it, a retailer that wants bot detection at login rather than only at checkout, an organisation replacing an in-house customer login system that has become an unfunded engineering liability. Of those, a bank moving a consumer base off passwords to passkeys without losing customers at the migration step and an insurer whose account recovery flow is the main account takeover route and needs risk scoring inside it are not what Trimble Unity Maintain is typically brought in for.
- What can Transmit Security do that Trimble Unity Maintain cannot?
- Transmit Security covers Passwordless authentication, Detection and response, Identity verification, Orchestration. Trimble Unity Maintain covers Built on ArcGIS, Service requests, Work order management, Permits and licensing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Transmit Security: Do we have to replace our existing identity provider?
No. The services are composable, so detection and response or verification can be adopted alongside an existing provider such as Okta or Entra ID.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Is Cityworks discontinued?
Not discontinued, renamed. It is becoming Trimble Unity Maintain, converging with AgileAssets, and Trimble has not published a final transition date.
Transmit Security: Is fraud detection an extra licence?
It is a separate service, but it is designed to run inside the authentication flow rather than as a bolted-on second vendor. Confirm which services are in your quote.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Do I need Esri ArcGIS?
Yes. The product is built on ArcGIS and cannot be deployed without an Esri licence.
Transmit Security: Is there a way to try it?
Yes, a free developer tier exists for evaluation, though production use is an enterprise agreement.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Was there a security incident?
Yes. CVE-2025-0994 in Cityworks was exploited in the wild and added to the CISA known exploited vulnerabilities catalogue in February 2025.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Can it handle roads and pavement as well as pipes?
Yes, through the AgileAssets lineage now inside the Unity Maintain family, which adds linear referencing for transportation assets.
Related pages
More on Transmit Security
More on Trimble Unity Maintain
Other head to heads
- Transmit Security vs Descope
- Transmit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Transmit Security vs Beyond Identity
- Transmit Security vs Sardine
- Transmit Security vs Feedzai
- Transmit Security vs Socure
- Transmit Security vs Unit21
- Transmit Security vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Transmit Security vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Transmit Security vs Ping Identity
- Transmit Security vs Stytch
- Transmit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Transmit Security vs Semgrep
- Transmit Security vs Spot AI
- Transmit Security vs Syft
- Transmit Security vs ThetaRay
- Transmit Security vs Trivy
- Transmit Security vs Trulioo
- Transmit Security vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Transmit Security vs VUEWorks
- Transmit Security vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Transmit Security vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Transmit Security vs RecDesk
- Transmit Security vs DataSF
- Transmit Security vs CityView
- Transmit Security vs Euna Solutions
- Transmit Security vs Clariti
- Transmit Security vs Springbrook Software
- Transmit Security vs OpenGov
- Transmit Security vs Bidnet Direct
- Transmit Security vs ShotSpotter
- Transmit Security vs Tyler Brazos
- Transmit Security vs Vigilant Solutions
- Transmit Security vs Workday Government
- Transmit Security vs Zencity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Descope
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs NICE Actimize
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Beyond Identity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Sardine
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Feedzai
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Socure
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Unit21
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Ping Identity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Stytch
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Rhombus Systems
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Semgrep
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Spot AI
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Syft
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs ThetaRay
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Trivy
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Trulioo
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs VUEWorks
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs RecDesk
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs DataSF
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CityView
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Euna Solutions
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Clariti
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Springbrook Software
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs OpenGov
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Bidnet Direct
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs ShotSpotter
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Tyler Brazos
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Vigilant Solutions
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Workday Government
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Zencity
