Cybersecurity · head to head
Syft vs Trimble Unity Maintain

Syft
Cybersecurity
Generates a software bill of materials from images, filesystems and archives
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Trimble Unity Maintain
Government
GIS-centric public asset and work management, the product formerly sold as Cityworks
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Syft has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Syft lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.; Trimble Unity Maintain esri ArcGIS is a hard prerequisite, so an organisation without it faces a second substantial licence and a GIS programme before the maintenance system can be used at all.
- They diverge on capability: Syft covers Multi-format output, Trimble Unity Maintain covers Built on ArcGIS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Syft and Trimble Unity Maintain actually diverge.
| Attribute | Syft | Trimble Unity Maintain |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Open source, no licence fee | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker | Web, iOS, Android, Windows |
| Category | Cybersecurity | Government |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Syft
- Multi-format output
- Broad ecosystem coverage
- Binary classifiers
- In-toto attestations
- Library and CLI
- Pairs with Grype
Only in Trimble Unity Maintain
- Built on ArcGIS
- Service requests
- Work order management
- Permits and licensing
- Mobile field access
- Storeroom and inventory
- Operational Insights
- AgileAssets convergence
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Syft
- Producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires onenot Trimble Unity Maintain
- Feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directlynot Trimble Unity Maintain
- Recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quicklynot Trimble Unity Maintain
- Public sector work where an SBOM is a contractual deliverablenot Trimble Unity Maintain
Trimble Unity Maintain
- A water utility wanting valve exercising and hydrant flushing recorded against the same GIS features the engineering team maintainsnot Syft
- A city consolidating a citizen service request line, work orders and inspections into one location-based systemnot Syft
- A state transportation department managing pavement and bridge assets with linear referencing rather than point assetsnot Syft
- A public works department that has already licensed ArcGIS Enterprise and wants to avoid rekeying its asset inventorynot Syft
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Syft
- Lockfile parsing can drop packages silently. An open issue filed in August 2026 reports the yarn v1 cataloguer returning 118 of 745 packages with no error raised, which means a complete bill of materials and an 84 percent incomplete one look identical to the caller.
- Fidelity varies sharply by ecosystem. Conan for C and C++, Haskell and Terraform get cataloguer support with no licence data, no dependency relationships and no file ownership, so a C and C++ shop gets the least from it.
- Binary classification yields no licence or dependency metadata, and vendored or statically linked code is exactly where supply chain risk hides, so the blind spot and the risk overlap.
- Incorrect CPE values and CPE collisions are recorded as open issues, and since Grype matches on CPE and PURL, an inventory error becomes a false negative in the security report downstream.
- An inventory is not a risk assessment. Even a perfect bill of materials says a vulnerable version is present, never that the vulnerable function is called, and the triage burden lands entirely on the reader.
Trimble Unity Maintain
- Esri ArcGIS is a hard prerequisite, so an organisation without it faces a second substantial licence and a GIS programme before the maintenance system can be used at all.
- The product is mid-rename from Cityworks to Trimble Unity Maintain with transition timelines Trimble has not committed to publicly, leaving contracts, documentation and integrator experience split between two names.
- CVE-2025-0994, a deserialisation flaw in Cityworks, was exploited in the wild and listed by CISA in February 2025, which makes on-premise deployments a patching obligation rather than a set-and-forget install.
- Because assets live in the GIS, changing the asset model is a GIS division change, so maintenance teams cannot restructure their own hierarchy without another department in the loop.
- It is built for North American public sector practice, and the permitting, funding source and reporting models do not map cleanly onto other countries or onto private industrial estates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Syft
Free- SyftFree
- Apache-2.0
- No usage limits
- Community support
- Anchore Enterprise$undefined/year
- Policy enforcement and reporting
- Federal and commercial tiers
- Pricing not published, quoted on request
Trimble Unity Maintain
On request- Trimble Unity Maintain$undefined/year
- Annual subscription sized by population served, asset volume and user count
- Esri ArcGIS Enterprise or ArcGIS Online licensing required separately
- Hosted and on-premise deployment priced differently
Which should you pick?
Choose Syft if
- You need multi-format output.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker.
- You also want broad ecosystem coverage.
Choose Trimble Unity Maintain if
- You need built on arcgis.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- You also want service requests.
Questions people ask
- Is Syft or Trimble Unity Maintain better?
- Neither clearly leads. Syft starts at Free and Trimble Unity Maintain at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Syft or Trimble Unity Maintain?
- Syft has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Syft and On request for Trimble Unity Maintain.
- Does Syft or Trimble Unity Maintain run on more platforms?
- Syft runs on macOS, Linux, Windows, Docker. Trimble Unity Maintain runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows.
- Can I use Syft for free?
- Yes. Syft has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Trimble Unity Maintain starts at On request.
- What is Syft best used for?
- Syft is most often used for producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires one, feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directly, recording what shipped in a build so a future disclosure can be answered quickly, public sector work where an sbom is a contractual deliverable. Of those, producing a bill of materials for a customer or regulator that requires one and feeding an inventory into a vulnerability scanner rather than scanning images directly are not what Trimble Unity Maintain is typically brought in for.
- What can Syft do that Trimble Unity Maintain cannot?
- Syft covers Multi-format output, Broad ecosystem coverage, Binary classifiers, In-toto attestations. Trimble Unity Maintain covers Built on ArcGIS, Service requests, Work order management, Permits and licensing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Syft: Does Syft find vulnerabilities?
No. It produces an inventory. Grype, from the same company, matches that inventory against vulnerability feeds. They are separate tools and the distinction is frequently lost.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Is Cityworks discontinued?
Not discontinued, renamed. It is becoming Trimble Unity Maintain, converging with AgileAssets, and Trimble has not published a final transition date.
Syft: Does anything in the Anchore stack do reachability analysis?
No. Neither Syft, Grype nor the commercial Anchore platform performs call graph or reachability analysis, so none of them tells you whether a vulnerable code path is actually invoked.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Do I need Esri ArcGIS?
Yes. The product is built on ArcGIS and cannot be deployed without an Esri licence.
Syft: Is it a CNCF or OpenSSF project?
No. It is single-vendor open source owned by Anchore, with no foundation governance. That is a different licence risk profile from Sigstore.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Was there a security incident?
Yes. CVE-2025-0994 in Cityworks was exploited in the wild and added to the CISA known exploited vulnerabilities catalogue in February 2025.
Syft: What does Anchore Enterprise cost?
Not published. The pricing page is contact-sales only, with named but unpriced commercial and federal tiers.
Trimble Unity Maintain: Can it handle roads and pavement as well as pipes?
Yes, through the AgileAssets lineage now inside the Unity Maintain family, which adds linear referencing for transportation assets.
Syft: How do I know my SBOM is complete?
You largely cannot, which is the honest answer. Silent partial parsing is a known open defect, so a bill of materials used for compliance should be spot-checked against a known dependency list.
Related pages
More on Trimble Unity Maintain
Other head to heads
- Syft vs Cosign
- Syft vs Sigstore
- Syft vs Trivy
- Syft vs Chainguard
- Syft vs Metasploit
- Syft vs Wireshark
- Syft vs Semgrep
- Syft vs Legit Security
- Syft vs OWASP ZAP
- Syft vs HashiCorp Vault
- Syft vs Bitwarden
- Syft vs Infisical
- Syft vs Tenable Nessus
- Syft vs Transmit Security
- Syft vs TrustArc
- Syft vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Syft vs VMware Carbon Black
- Syft vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Syft vs VUEWorks
- Syft vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Syft vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Syft vs RecDesk
- Syft vs DataSF
- Syft vs CityView
- Syft vs Euna Solutions
- Syft vs Clariti
- Syft vs Springbrook Software
- Syft vs OpenGov
- Syft vs Bidnet Direct
- Syft vs ShotSpotter
- Syft vs Tyler Brazos
- Syft vs Vigilant Solutions
- Syft vs Workday Government
- Syft vs Zencity
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Cosign
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Sigstore
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Trivy
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Chainguard
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Metasploit
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Wireshark
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Semgrep
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Legit Security
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs OWASP ZAP
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs HashiCorp Vault
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Bitwarden
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Infisical
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Tenable Nessus
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Transmit Security
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs TrustArc
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs VMware Carbon Black
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs VUEWorks
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs RecDesk
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs DataSF
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs CityView
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Euna Solutions
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Clariti
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Springbrook Software
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs OpenGov
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Bidnet Direct
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs ShotSpotter
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Tyler Brazos
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Vigilant Solutions
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Workday Government
- Trimble Unity Maintain vs Zencity
