Nonprofits · head to head
Tendenci vs Umami

Tendenci
Nonprofits
Open-source association management system for nonprofits
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Umami
Marketing
Open source, cookie-free web analytics you can self-host for the cost of a database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Tendenci self-hosting is a real operational commitment, and organisations without technical capacity should not treat the free licence as a free system; Umami there is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- They diverge on capability: Tendenci covers Open-source licence, Umami covers Cookie-free tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Tendenci and Umami actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Tendenci
- Open-source licence
- Membership management
- Events and registration
- Donations
- Content-managed website
Only in Umami
- Cookie-free tracking
- Self-hosting
- Small tracking script
- Custom events
- Funnels and goals
- Multi-site and teams
- Public dashboards
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Tendenci
- Nonprofits whose boards require member and donor data to stay under their own controlnot Umami
- Organisations with data residency obligations a hosted platform cannot satisfynot Umami
- Groups with technical capacity wanting to avoid per-member subscription costs at scalenot Umami
- Associations needing to customise workflows beyond what a proprietary platform allowsnot Umami
Umami
- A developer who wants traffic numbers on a personal or client site without adding a consent bannernot Tendenci
- An organisation whose legal or procurement team has ruled out sending visitor data to a US advertising companynot Tendenci
- A high-traffic site where hosted analytics priced by pageview band has become expensive and self-hosting removes the ceiling entirelynot Tendenci
- A team that wants analytics data in a database they already control so they can query and join it themselvesnot Tendenci
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Tendenci
- Self-hosting is a real operational commitment, and organisations without technical capacity should not treat the free licence as a free system
- The community is small compared with mainstream open-source projects, so answers are harder to find and contributors are few
- The interface is dated against the commercial association platforms and this is the most common user complaint
- Fewer integrations than commercial competitors, and building them is a development task rather than a configuration one
- Feature depth in events and continuing education is behind the specialist commercial systems
Umami
- There is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Self-hosting is only free in licence terms; you own the database, the upgrades, the backups and the query performance at scale, and a busy site's events table grows quickly enough to need real attention.
- Because it stores no persistent identifier, it cannot follow a user across devices or sessions in any meaningful way, which makes returning-visitor and lifetime-value questions unanswerable by design rather than by omission.
- Cloud overage is billed per event beyond the plan allowance, so a traffic spike or a badly instrumented custom event can produce a bill materially above the $20 or $200 headline before anyone notices.
- It is maintained by a small team, so the pace of new capability is modest and enterprise expectations such as SSO, granular role permissions and formal support agreements are limited compared with commercial analytics vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Tendenci
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Full source code
- No per-member licence
- Community support
- Managed hosting$undefined/month
- Hosted and maintained
- Updates applied
- Support included
Umami
Free- Self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- No event limit imposed by the software
- Unlimited websites and users
- Cloud HobbyFree
- Up to 100,000 events per month
- 3 websites
- 6 months data retention
- Cloud Pro$20/month
- Up to 1,000,000 events per month
- Unlimited websites
- Unlimited team members
- Cloud Business$200/month
- Up to 10,000,000 events per month
- All Pro features
- Higher volume overage rate
Which should you pick?
Choose Tendenci if
- You need open-source licence.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud.
- You also want membership management.
Choose Umami if
- You need cookie-free tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want self-hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is Tendenci or Umami better?
- Neither clearly leads. Tendenci starts at Free and Umami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Tendenci or Umami?
- Tendenci starts at Free and Umami at Free.
- Does Tendenci or Umami run on more platforms?
- Tendenci runs on Web, Linux, Self-hosted, Cloud. Umami runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Tendenci for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Tendenci best used for?
- Tendenci is most often used for nonprofits whose boards require member and donor data to stay under their own control, organisations with data residency obligations a hosted platform cannot satisfy, groups with technical capacity wanting to avoid per-member subscription costs at scale, associations needing to customise workflows beyond what a proprietary platform allows. Of those, nonprofits whose boards require member and donor data to stay under their own control and organisations with data residency obligations a hosted platform cannot satisfy are not what Umami is typically brought in for.
- What can Tendenci do that Umami cannot?
- Tendenci covers Open-source licence, Membership management, Events and registration, Donations. Umami covers Cookie-free tracking, Self-hosting, Small tracking script, Custom events.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Tendenci: Is Tendenci really free?
The software is, under an open-source licence with no per-member fee. Running it is not: hosting, updates, backups and security are the organisation responsibility unless managed hosting is purchased.
Umami: Is Umami really free?
Self-hosted, yes; it is MIT licensed with no event cap. You pay for the server and database. Umami Cloud has a free tier at 100,000 events a month and paid tiers from $20.
Tendenci: Who should choose it?
Organisations with a genuine requirement to control their own data, and the technical capacity to act on it. Choosing it purely to avoid subscription cost usually ends badly.
Umami: Do I need a cookie consent banner?
For Umami analytics specifically, generally no, because it sets no cookies and stores no personal data. Other tags on your site may still require one.
Tendenci: Can I move my data out?
Yes, entirely. That is the point. Data lives in a PostgreSQL database you control, and there is no vendor holding it.
Umami: Can it replace Google Analytics?
For traffic, referrers and event counts, yes. For attribution modelling, audiences and advertising integration, no.
Tendenci: How does it compare to Wild Apricot?
Wild Apricot is easier, better supported and better looking. Tendenci is the answer when data ownership is a requirement rather than a preference.
Umami: What does it need to run?
A container and a PostgreSQL or MySQL database. Most people deploy it on infrastructure they already pay for.
Tendenci: Is it actively maintained?
It is developed openly on GitHub with a small team and community. Check recent commit activity before committing, as with any small open-source project.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Tendenci vs MemberClicks
- Tendenci vs CiviCRM
- Tendenci vs Glue Up
- Tendenci vs Submittable
- Tendenci vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Tendenci vs Bloomerang
- Tendenci vs NeonCRM
- Tendenci vs DonorPerfect
- Tendenci vs CharityEngine
- Tendenci vs GrantStation
- Tendenci vs Little Green Light
- Tendenci vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Tendenci vs Salsa CRM
- Tendenci vs Virtuous
- Tendenci vs CommCare
- Tendenci vs Wild Apricot
- Tendenci vs Matomo
- Tendenci vs Plausible
- Tendenci vs Fathom Analytics
- Tendenci vs Mautic
- Tendenci vs Countly
- Tendenci vs Freshpaint
- Tendenci vs Simple Analytics
- Tendenci vs Attribution
- Tendenci vs CallRail
- Tendenci vs Microsoft Clarity
- Tendenci vs Octoboard
- Tendenci vs Onclusive
- Tendenci vs WebEngage
- Tendenci vs Woopra
- Tendenci vs Wunderkind
- Tendenci vs Typeform
- Tendenci vs MoEngage
- Tendenci vs Optimizely
- Umami vs MemberClicks
- Umami vs CiviCRM
- Umami vs Glue Up
- Umami vs Submittable
- Umami vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Umami vs Bloomerang
- Umami vs NeonCRM
- Umami vs DonorPerfect
- Umami vs CharityEngine
- Umami vs GrantStation
- Umami vs Little Green Light
- Umami vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Umami vs Salsa CRM
- Umami vs Virtuous
- Umami vs CommCare
- Umami vs Wild Apricot
- Umami vs Matomo
- Umami vs Plausible
- Umami vs Fathom Analytics
- Umami vs Mautic
- Umami vs Countly
- Umami vs Freshpaint
- Umami vs Simple Analytics
- Umami vs Attribution
- Umami vs CallRail
- Umami vs Microsoft Clarity
- Umami vs Octoboard
- Umami vs Onclusive
- Umami vs WebEngage
- Umami vs Woopra
- Umami vs Wunderkind
- Umami vs Typeform
- Umami vs MoEngage
- Umami vs Optimizely
