Softwr

Healthcare · head to head

Tebra vs Therapixel

Tebra logo

Tebra

Healthcare

Practice management combining EHR, billing and patient engagement for independent practices

From
On request
Rated
-
Therapixel logo

Therapixel

Healthcare

French mammography AI with FDA clearances for 2D and tomosynthesis breast screening

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Tebra no pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration; Therapixel european and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Tebra and Therapixel actually diverge.

Attributes where Tebra and Therapixel differ
AttributeTebraTherapixel

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Tebra

Nothing recorded that Therapixel does not also cover.

Only in Therapixel

  • MammoScreen 2D
  • MammoScreen DBT
  • One to ten suspicion score
  • Summary report
  • Workstation and PACS delivery
  • Reading workflow configurations

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Tebra

  • Consolidating scheduling, charting, billing into single systemnot Therapixel
  • Automating claims submission and denial managementnot Therapixel
  • Reducing appointment no-shows through automated remindersnot Therapixel
  • Reducing documentation time to five minutes with AInot Therapixel
  • E-prescribing controlled substances with PDMP and EPCSnot Therapixel

Therapixel

  • A European breast screening programme running mandatory double reading that wants to evaluate AI as a concurrent or second reader within what national guidance permitsnot Tebra
  • An American breast centre that has moved to tomosynthesis and needs reading support on DBT specifically, which Therapixel holds a clearance fornot Tebra
  • A screening service wanting a graded suspicion score rather than a binary flag so readers can calibrate their own thresholdnot Tebra
  • A radiology group evaluating multiple mammography AI vendors head to head on their own historic case set before committingnot Tebra

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Tebra

  • No pricing amounts published; custom quote required based on practice configuration
  • Pricing based on per-provider licensing model with additional costs for EPCS setup and PDMP integration

Therapixel

  • European and American regulatory positions were established under different regimes, and under the EU Medical Device Regulation this class of diagnostic AI faces a higher classification and notified body scrutiny, so European buyers must verify the current MDR certificate and expiry rather than relying on a legacy CE reference.
  • MammoScreen does mammography only, so a hospital wanting AI across head CT, chest and breast needs several vendors and several PACS integrations, or an orchestration layer bought from someone else.
  • Therapixel is a small French company competing against Hologic and iCAD, which have incumbency inside the mammography reading workstation, so integration into an American breast centre is more work than it is for the workstation vendor own AI.
  • Detection performance is sensitive to the mammography unit vendor and acquisition protocol, so published results do not transfer between estates and each site needs local validation it must fund itself.
  • Whether AI can substitute for one of two human readers is a national workforce and liability question, not a product capability, so the labour saving that justifies the purchase in one country is not permitted in another.

Pricing, plan by plan

Tebra

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Tebra review.

Therapixel

On request
  • MammoScreen$undefined/year
    • Priced per examination or by annual screening volume
    • 2D and tomosynthesis licensed by the versions cleared for each
    • Cloud or on premises deployment quoted differently

Which should you pick?

Choose Tebra if

Nothing in the data separates Tebra from Therapixel on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose Therapixel if

  • You need mammoscreen 2d.
  • You also want mammoscreen dbt.

Questions people ask

Is Tebra or Therapixel better?
Neither clearly leads. Tebra starts at On request and Therapixel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Tebra or Therapixel?
Tebra starts at On request and Therapixel at On request.
Does Tebra or Therapixel run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Tebra best used for?
Tebra is most often used for consolidating scheduling, charting, billing into single system, automating claims submission and denial management, reducing appointment no-shows through automated reminders, reducing documentation time to five minutes with ai. Of those, consolidating scheduling, charting, billing into single system and automating claims submission and denial management are not what Therapixel is typically brought in for.
What can Tebra do that Therapixel cannot?
Therapixel covers MammoScreen 2D, MammoScreen DBT, One to ten suspicion score, Summary report.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Tebra: How does Tebra's pricing model work?

Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers rather than user seats. Non-clinical staff get unlimited access at no additional cost. Low-volume providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing.

Source
Therapixel: Is MammoScreen FDA cleared?

Yes. It holds 510(k) clearance K192854 for two dimensional mammography from July 2020, a November 2021 clearance for digital breast tomosynthesis, and two further clearances in October 2024 for later versions.

Tebra: What are the setup and integration costs beyond the monthly fee?

Electronic Prescribing Controlled Substances (EPCS) setup costs approximately $75 per provider as a one-time fee. PDMP integration costs $500 one-time per facility plus approximately $50 per user per year.

Source
Therapixel: Is it CE marked?

Yes, but European buyers should ask specifically for the current certificate under the Medical Device Regulation and its expiry date, because this class of diagnostic AI moved to a higher classification under MDR.

Tebra: Are there volume discounts for practices using multiple modules?

Yes, bundled pricing and volume incentives are available for multi-module adoption. Practices can request a personalized quote to see potential savings.

Source
Therapixel: What does the one to ten score mean?

It is a graded suspicion score per finding and per study, designed to be integrated alongside a radiologist BI-RADS assessment rather than treated as a positive or negative result.

Tebra: Does Tebra offer published pricing or is a quote always required?

Tebra does not publish specific monthly costs. Pricing varies depending on the number of providers, platform features needed, and implementation requirements. A personalized quote is required to get pricing.

Source
Therapixel: Does it cover anything besides mammography?

No. It is a mammography product only, including tomosynthesis. Other body regions need a different vendor.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads