Legal · head to head
DISCO vs Tabs3

DISCO
Legal
Cloud e-discovery priced by data volume, with review, legal hold and case preparation in one platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tabs3
Legal
Billing, trust and general ledger accounting for small and mid-sized US law firms
- From
- $69/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DISCO per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.; Tabs3 the interface follows Windows desktop conventions from an earlier era, so new fee earners and staff take longer to train than they would on a browser-based competitor.
- They diverge on capability: DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Tabs3 covers Tabs3 Billing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DISCO and Tabs3 actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DISCO
- All-in per-gigabyte pricing
- Cecilia AI
- Technology assisted review
- Legal hold
- Case Builder
- Self-service ingestion
Only in Tabs3
- Tabs3 Billing
- Trust accounting
- General ledger and accounts payable
- PracticeMaster
- On-premises or cloud subscription
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DISCO
- A litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully knownnot Tabs3
- A firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surgenot Tabs3
- An in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of twonot Tabs3
- A case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platformnot Tabs3
Tabs3
- Small firms billing hourly that want billing and the firm general ledger in one system rather than reconciling twonot DISCO
- Practices that must run three-way trust reconciliation without a separate bookkeeping packagenot DISCO
- Firms that need an on-premises deployment because of client or insurer restrictions on cloud-hosted matter datanot DISCO
- Long-established practices replacing a decades-old billing system while keeping accounting in housenot DISCO
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DISCO
- Per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.
- Hosting is cloud only in United States regions, so matters with European, United Kingdom or Australian data residency requirements are excluded outright.
- Review analytics, scripting and the third-party application ecosystem remain deeper on Relativity, which matters for firms with established review workflows.
- As a listed company reporting losses, it has been through leadership change including the founder departure in 2023, so multi-year roadmap commitments carry more risk than with a private vendor.
- Complex productions and unusual data types still require professional services, so the promise of self-service holds mainly for mainstream email and document collections.
Tabs3
- The interface follows Windows desktop conventions from an earlier era, so new fee earners and staff take longer to train than they would on a browser-based competitor.
- On-premises deployment puts backup, disaster recovery, server upgrades and patching on the firm, which small practices without IT support routinely underestimate.
- It is built around hourly and flat fee billing, so a contingency practice tracking case costs and settlement disbursements will find the case financial model a poor fit.
- PracticeMaster case management is priced separately from billing, so the advertised per-user rate is not what a firm wanting matter management actually pays.
- Choosing the on-premises option no longer avoids a subscription, because it is billed per user per month like the hosted version.
Pricing, plan by plan
DISCO
On request- DISCO Ediscovery$undefined/year
- Quoted per gigabyte of hosted data per month with unlimited users
- Annual commitments and volume tiers negotiated for firms with steady caseloads
- Legal hold, Case Builder and AI features priced as separate modules
Tabs3
$69/month- OnSite Subscription$69/month
- Deployed on the firm server
- Billing, trust accounting and general ledger
- PracticeMaster add-on at 32 USD per user per month
- Tabs3 Cloud$89/month
- Hosted by the vendor
- Billing, trust accounting and general ledger
- PracticeMaster add-on at 35 USD per user per month
Which should you pick?
Choose Tabs3 if
- You need tabs3 billing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want trust accounting.
Questions people ask
- Is DISCO or Tabs3 better?
- Neither clearly leads. DISCO starts at On request and Tabs3 at $69/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DISCO or Tabs3?
- DISCO starts at On request and Tabs3 at $69/month.
- Does DISCO or Tabs3 run on more platforms?
- DISCO runs on Web. Tabs3 runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- What is DISCO best used for?
- DISCO is most often used for a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known, a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge, an in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of two, a case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platform. Of those, a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known and a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge are not what Tabs3 is typically brought in for.
- What can DISCO do that Tabs3 cannot?
- DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Cecilia AI, Technology assisted review, Legal hold. Tabs3 covers Tabs3 Billing, Trust accounting, General ledger and accounts payable, PracticeMaster.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DISCO: How is DISCO priced?
Per gigabyte of hosted data per month, all-in, with unlimited users. There is no published rate card, so it is quoted.
Tabs3: Is Tabs3 right for a personal injury firm working on contingency?
No. It is built for hourly and flat fee billing with a firm general ledger. A contingency practice needs case cost tracking and settlement disbursement handling, which is what CASEpeer and Filevine are built around.
DISCO: Can data be hosted outside the United States?
Coverage is centred on United States cloud regions, so confirm residency before shortlisting for European or Australian matters.
Tabs3: Can I still buy Tabs3 as a perpetual licence?
No published perpetual price exists. The on-premises option, called OnSite Subscription, starts at 69 USD per user per month, with the hosted Tabs3 Cloud starting at 89 USD per user per month.
DISCO: Is it cheaper than Relativity?
On small and mid-sized matters usually yes, because seats and analytics are included. On very large collections the volume charge often overtakes a negotiated Relativity arrangement.
Tabs3: Does it replace QuickBooks?
For most firms yes. It includes a double-entry general ledger and accounts payable, which is the usual reason firms choose it over billing-only products.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DISCO vs Relativity
- DISCO vs Everlaw
- DISCO vs Logikcull
- DISCO vs Filevine
- DISCO vs Luminance
- DISCO vs CASEpeer
- DISCO vs Cookiebot
- DISCO vs iubenda
- DISCO vs LexisNexis
- DISCO vs Litify
- DISCO vs Ironclad
- DISCO vs Spellbook
- DISCO vs Intapp
- DISCO vs Litera
- DISCO vs Rocket Matter
- DISCO vs Secure Privacy
- DISCO vs Clio
- DISCO vs Smokeball
- DISCO vs CosmoLex
- DISCO vs Aderant
- DISCO vs Actionstep
- DISCO vs iManage
- DISCO vs MyCase
- DISCO vs Westlaw
- DISCO vs Lawmatics
- DISCO vs Docketwise
- DISCO vs Harvey
- Tabs3 vs Relativity
- Tabs3 vs Everlaw
- Tabs3 vs Logikcull
- Tabs3 vs Filevine
- Tabs3 vs Luminance
- Tabs3 vs CASEpeer
- Tabs3 vs Cookiebot
- Tabs3 vs iubenda
- Tabs3 vs LexisNexis
- Tabs3 vs Litify
- Tabs3 vs Ironclad
- Tabs3 vs Spellbook
- Tabs3 vs Intapp
- Tabs3 vs Litera
- Tabs3 vs Rocket Matter
- Tabs3 vs Secure Privacy
- Tabs3 vs Clio
- Tabs3 vs Smokeball
- Tabs3 vs CosmoLex
- Tabs3 vs Aderant
- Tabs3 vs Actionstep
- Tabs3 vs iManage
- Tabs3 vs MyCase
- Tabs3 vs Westlaw
- Tabs3 vs Lawmatics
- Tabs3 vs Docketwise
- Tabs3 vs Harvey
