Softwr

Legal · head to head

Actionstep vs DISCO

Actionstep logo

Actionstep

Legal

Configurable legal practice and accounting management platform sold as two separate products, priced per user with no published rate

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
DISCO logo

DISCO

Legal

Cloud e-discovery priced by data volume, with review, legal hold and case preparation in one platform

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Actionstep no pricing is published beyond a rough $60 a month starting figure; real cost including implementation and add-ons requires a sales quote and can rise substantially, as one documented case showed a fourfold increase within a year.; DISCO per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.
  • They diverge on capability: Actionstep covers Configurable workflows, DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Actionstep and DISCO actually diverge.

Attributes where Actionstep and DISCO differ
AttributeActionstepDISCO
Pricing modelPer user per monthquote
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Actionstep

  • Configurable workflows
  • Legal Accounting
  • Builder
  • Capture
  • Trace
  • Acumen

Only in DISCO

  • All-in per-gigabyte pricing
  • Cecilia AI
  • Technology assisted review
  • Legal hold
  • Case Builder
  • Self-service ingestion

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Actionstep

  • A firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structurenot DISCO
  • A US firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter managementnot DISCO
  • A firm using AI time capture to reduce billing leakage from unrecorded worknot DISCO
  • A growing mid-size firm wanting embedded analytics on matter profitability without exporting to a separate BI toolnot DISCO

DISCO

  • A litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully knownnot Actionstep
  • A firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surgenot Actionstep
  • An in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of twonot Actionstep
  • A case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platformnot Actionstep

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Actionstep

  • No pricing is published beyond a rough $60 a month starting figure; real cost including implementation and add-ons requires a sales quote and can rise substantially, as one documented case showed a fourfold increase within a year.
  • The configurability that is the main selling point means implementation is a genuine project requiring firm time to design workflows, not a same-day signup like more templated competitors.
  • Legal Accounting is sold as a separate North America-only product, so international firms cannot get the full accounting feature set through the same purchase.
  • Reviewer base skews heavily toward small firms, and Actionstep itself is candid that most of its reviews come from small businesses, which is a signal about where the product is proven at scale.
  • Add-on modules (Builder, Capture, Trace, Acumen) are each additional cost, so a firm comparing Actionstep to an all-in-one competitor needs to price in modules separately to get a fair comparison.

DISCO

  • Per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.
  • Hosting is cloud only in United States regions, so matters with European, United Kingdom or Australian data residency requirements are excluded outright.
  • Review analytics, scripting and the third-party application ecosystem remain deeper on Relativity, which matters for firms with established review workflows.
  • As a listed company reporting losses, it has been through leadership change including the founder departure in 2023, so multi-year roadmap commitments carry more risk than with a private vendor.
  • Complex productions and unusual data types still require professional services, so the promise of self-service holds mainly for mainstream email and document collections.

Pricing, plan by plan

Actionstep

On request
  • Practice Management$undefined/month
    • Starts around $60 per user per month, quote required for exact rate
    • Implementation fees charged separately
    • Priced per user, varies by region (US, UK, AU, NZ, CAD)
  • Legal Accounting$undefined/month
    • North America only
    • Sold separately from or combined with Practice Management
    • Add-on modules (Builder, Capture, Trace, Acumen) priced separately

DISCO

On request
  • DISCO Ediscovery$undefined/year
    • Quoted per gigabyte of hosted data per month with unlimited users
    • Annual commitments and volume tiers negotiated for firms with steady caseloads
    • Legal hold, Case Builder and AI features priced as separate modules

Which should you pick?

Choose Actionstep if

  • You need configurable workflows.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want legal accounting.
Actionstep review

Choose DISCO if

  • You need all-in per-gigabyte pricing.
  • You also want cecilia ai.
DISCO review

Questions people ask

Is Actionstep or DISCO better?
Neither clearly leads. Actionstep starts at On request and DISCO at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Actionstep or DISCO?
Actionstep starts at On request and DISCO at On request.
Does Actionstep or DISCO run on more platforms?
Actionstep runs on Web, iOS, Android. DISCO runs on Web.
What is Actionstep best used for?
Actionstep is most often used for a firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structure, a us firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter management, a firm using ai time capture to reduce billing leakage from unrecorded work, a growing mid-size firm wanting embedded analytics on matter profitability without exporting to a separate bi tool. Of those, a firm whose matter types do not fit standard case management templates and wants to build its own workflow structure and a us firm needing trust accounting compliance built into the same system as matter management are not what DISCO is typically brought in for.
What can Actionstep do that DISCO cannot?
Actionstep covers Configurable workflows, Legal Accounting, Builder, Capture. DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Cecilia AI, Technology assisted review, Legal hold.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Actionstep: Is Actionstep pricing published?

No. The pricing page gives no rate card; you must request a quote, and cost is per user plus implementation fees, varying by region.

DISCO: How is DISCO priced?

Per gigabyte of hosted data per month, all-in, with unlimited users. There is no published rate card, so it is quoted.

Actionstep: Can I buy just the accounting product?

Yes, Legal Accounting is sold separately from Practice Management, though it is limited to North America.

DISCO: Can data be hosted outside the United States?

Coverage is centred on United States cloud regions, so confirm residency before shortlisting for European or Australian matters.

Actionstep: Does it work like Clio or MyCase out of the box?

Not exactly. Actionstep leans on firm-configured workflows rather than fixed templates, which means more setup but a closer eventual fit to how the firm works.

DISCO: Is it cheaper than Relativity?

On small and mid-sized matters usually yes, because seats and analytics are included. On very large collections the volume charge often overtakes a negotiated Relativity arrangement.

Share

Related pages

More on Actionstep

More on DISCO

Keep looking

Other head to heads