Legal · head to head
Clio vs Tabs3

Tabs3
Legal
Billing, trust and general ledger accounting for small and mid-sized US law firms
- From
- $69/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clio priced per user per month, so cost scales directly with headcount and adds up for growing firms; Tabs3 the interface follows Windows desktop conventions from an earlier era, so new fee earners and staff take longer to train than they would on a browser-based competitor.
- They diverge on capability: Clio covers Matter management, Tabs3 covers Tabs3 Billing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clio and Tabs3 actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clio
- Matter management
- Time and billing
- Client intake
- Document management
- Integration directory
Only in Tabs3
- Tabs3 Billing
- General ledger and accounts payable
- PracticeMaster
- On-premises or cloud subscription
Both cover
- Trust accounting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clio
- Small and mid-sized firms replacing spreadsheets and paper matter filesnot Tabs3
- Firms needing compliant trust accounting without a separate systemnot Tabs3
- Practices billing hourly that lose revenue to uncaptured timenot Tabs3
Tabs3
- Small firms billing hourly that want billing and the firm general ledger in one system rather than reconciling twonot Clio
- Practices that must run three-way trust reconciliation without a separate bookkeeping packagenot Clio
- Firms that need an on-premises deployment because of client or insurer restrictions on cloud-hosted matter datanot Clio
- Long-established practices replacing a decades-old billing system while keeping accounting in housenot Clio
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clio
- Priced per user per month, so cost scales directly with headcount and adds up for growing firms
- Advanced features including some automation and reporting sit in higher tiers rather than the entry plan
- Aimed at small and mid-sized firms; large firms with complex matter structures often need heavier systems
- Strongest in North America, with less depth in other jurisdictions’ compliance requirements
Tabs3
- The interface follows Windows desktop conventions from an earlier era, so new fee earners and staff take longer to train than they would on a browser-based competitor.
- On-premises deployment puts backup, disaster recovery, server upgrades and patching on the firm, which small practices without IT support routinely underestimate.
- It is built around hourly and flat fee billing, so a contingency practice tracking case costs and settlement disbursements will find the case financial model a poor fit.
- PracticeMaster case management is priced separately from billing, so the advertised per-user rate is not what a firm wanting matter management actually pays.
- Choosing the on-premises option no longer avoids a subscription, because it is billed per user per month like the hosted version.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clio
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Clio review.
Tabs3
$69/month- OnSite Subscription$69/month
- Deployed on the firm server
- Billing, trust accounting and general ledger
- PracticeMaster add-on at 32 USD per user per month
- Tabs3 Cloud$89/month
- Hosted by the vendor
- Billing, trust accounting and general ledger
- PracticeMaster add-on at 35 USD per user per month
Which should you pick?
Choose Clio if
- You need matter management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
- You also want time and billing.
Choose Tabs3 if
- You need tabs3 billing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want general ledger and accounts payable.
Questions people ask
- Is Clio or Tabs3 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clio starts at On request and Tabs3 at $69/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clio or Tabs3?
- Clio starts at On request and Tabs3 at $69/month.
- Does Clio or Tabs3 run on more platforms?
- Clio runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud. Tabs3 runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Clio best used for?
- Clio is most often used for small and mid-sized firms replacing spreadsheets and paper matter files, firms needing compliant trust accounting without a separate system, practices billing hourly that lose revenue to uncaptured time. Of those, small and mid-sized firms replacing spreadsheets and paper matter files and firms needing compliant trust accounting without a separate system are not what Tabs3 is typically brought in for.
- What can Clio do that Tabs3 cannot?
- Clio covers Matter management, Time and billing, Client intake, Document management. Tabs3 covers Tabs3 Billing, General ledger and accounts payable, PracticeMaster, On-premises or cloud subscription. Both handle Trust accounting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clio: What does Clio cost?
Clio sells per-user subscriptions across several tiers. Rates change and vary by region, so check the vendor’s current pricing page rather than relying on a third-party figure.
Tabs3: Is Tabs3 right for a personal injury firm working on contingency?
No. It is built for hourly and flat fee billing with a firm general ledger. A contingency practice needs case cost tracking and settlement disbursement handling, which is what CASEpeer and Filevine are built around.
Clio: Does Clio handle trust accounting?
Yes, and it is one of the main reasons firms adopt it, because client fund rules are strict and mishandling them is a regulatory matter.
Tabs3: Can I still buy Tabs3 as a perpetual licence?
No published perpetual price exists. The on-premises option, called OnSite Subscription, starts at 69 USD per user per month, with the hosted Tabs3 Cloud starting at 89 USD per user per month.
Clio: Is Clio suitable for a large firm?
It is aimed at small and mid-sized practices. Large firms with complex matter and billing structures usually evaluate heavier enterprise systems.
Tabs3: Does it replace QuickBooks?
For most firms yes. It includes a double-entry general ledger and accounts payable, which is the usual reason firms choose it over billing-only products.
Clio: Does Clio integrate with existing tools?
Yes. Its integration directory is the largest in legal practice software, covering Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, QuickBooks and many others.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clio vs Smokeball
- Clio vs Aderant
- Clio vs iManage
- Clio vs CosmoLex
- Clio vs NetDocuments
- Clio vs CASEpeer
- Clio vs Rocket Matter
- Clio vs Spellbook
- Clio vs Filevine
- Clio vs Docketwise
- Clio vs Lawmatics
- Clio vs Westlaw
- Clio vs Cookiebot
- Clio vs Harvey
- Clio vs Actionstep
- Clio vs MyCase
- Clio vs Ironclad
- Clio vs Logikcull
- Tabs3 vs Smokeball
- Tabs3 vs Aderant
- Tabs3 vs iManage
- Tabs3 vs CosmoLex
- Tabs3 vs NetDocuments
- Tabs3 vs CASEpeer
- Tabs3 vs Rocket Matter
- Tabs3 vs Spellbook
- Tabs3 vs Filevine
- Tabs3 vs Docketwise
- Tabs3 vs Lawmatics
- Tabs3 vs Westlaw
- Tabs3 vs Cookiebot
- Tabs3 vs Harvey
- Tabs3 vs Actionstep
- Tabs3 vs MyCase
- Tabs3 vs Ironclad
- Tabs3 vs Logikcull

