Legal · head to head
DISCO vs Smokeball

DISCO
Legal
Cloud e-discovery priced by data volume, with review, legal hold and case preparation in one platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Smokeball
Legal
Practice management for small law firms with automatic time capture
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: DISCO per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.; Smokeball requires a Windows desktop component for automatic time capture, so it is not browser-only like its competitors
- They diverge on capability: DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Smokeball covers Automatic time capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which DISCO and Smokeball actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in DISCO
- All-in per-gigabyte pricing
- Cecilia AI
- Technology assisted review
- Legal hold
- Case Builder
- Self-service ingestion
Only in Smokeball
- Automatic time capture
- Matter management
- Document automation
- Billing and trust accounting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
DISCO
- A litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully knownnot Smokeball
- A firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surgenot Smokeball
- An in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of twonot Smokeball
- A case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platformnot Smokeball
Smokeball
- Firms billing hourly that lose revenue to unrecorded timenot DISCO
- Small practices replacing paper matter files and spreadsheetsnot DISCO
- Firms needing court form automation for high-volume matter typesnot DISCO
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
DISCO
- Per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.
- Hosting is cloud only in United States regions, so matters with European, United Kingdom or Australian data residency requirements are excluded outright.
- Review analytics, scripting and the third-party application ecosystem remain deeper on Relativity, which matters for firms with established review workflows.
- As a listed company reporting losses, it has been through leadership change including the founder departure in 2023, so multi-year roadmap commitments carry more risk than with a private vendor.
- Complex productions and unusual data types still require professional services, so the promise of self-service holds mainly for mainstream email and document collections.
Smokeball
- Requires a Windows desktop component for automatic time capture, so it is not browser-only like its competitors
- Quote-only pricing with no published rates
- Aimed at small firms; larger practices with complex billing arrangements generally outgrow it
Pricing, plan by plan
DISCO
On request- DISCO Ediscovery$undefined/year
- Quoted per gigabyte of hosted data per month with unlimited users
- Annual commitments and volume tiers negotiated for firms with steady caseloads
- Legal hold, Case Builder and AI features priced as separate modules
Smokeball
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Smokeball review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Smokeball if
- You need automatic time capture.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want matter management.
Questions people ask
- Is DISCO or Smokeball better?
- Neither clearly leads. DISCO starts at On request and Smokeball at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, DISCO or Smokeball?
- DISCO starts at On request and Smokeball at On request.
- Does DISCO or Smokeball run on more platforms?
- DISCO runs on Web. Smokeball runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- What is DISCO best used for?
- DISCO is most often used for a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known, a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge, an in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of two, a case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platform. Of those, a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known and a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge are not what Smokeball is typically brought in for.
- What can DISCO do that Smokeball cannot?
- DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Cecilia AI, Technology assisted review, Legal hold. Smokeball covers Automatic time capture, Matter management, Document automation, Billing and trust accounting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
DISCO: How is DISCO priced?
Per gigabyte of hosted data per month, all-in, with unlimited users. There is no published rate card, so it is quoted.
Smokeball: What does Smokeball cost?
Pricing is quoted per firm and not published.
DISCO: Can data be hosted outside the United States?
Coverage is centred on United States cloud regions, so confirm residency before shortlisting for European or Australian matters.
Smokeball: How does automatic time capture work?
A desktop application observes work on matters and turns activity into billable entries, rather than depending on someone remembering to start a timer.
DISCO: Is it cheaper than Relativity?
On small and mid-sized matters usually yes, because seats and analytics are included. On very large collections the volume charge often overtakes a negotiated Relativity arrangement.
Smokeball: Does it run on Mac?
The automatic time capture component is Windows-based, which is the main platform constraint.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- DISCO vs Relativity
- DISCO vs Everlaw
- DISCO vs Logikcull
- DISCO vs Filevine
- DISCO vs Luminance
- DISCO vs CASEpeer
- DISCO vs Cookiebot
- DISCO vs iubenda
- DISCO vs LexisNexis
- DISCO vs Litify
- DISCO vs Ironclad
- DISCO vs Spellbook
- DISCO vs Intapp
- DISCO vs Litera
- DISCO vs Rocket Matter
- DISCO vs Secure Privacy
- DISCO vs Tabs3
- DISCO vs Clio
- DISCO vs CosmoLex
- DISCO vs Actionstep
- DISCO vs Aderant
- DISCO vs iManage
- DISCO vs Docketwise
- DISCO vs Didomi
- Smokeball vs Relativity
- Smokeball vs Everlaw
- Smokeball vs Logikcull
- Smokeball vs Filevine
- Smokeball vs Luminance
- Smokeball vs CASEpeer
- Smokeball vs Cookiebot
- Smokeball vs iubenda
- Smokeball vs LexisNexis
- Smokeball vs Litify
- Smokeball vs Ironclad
- Smokeball vs Spellbook
- Smokeball vs Intapp
- Smokeball vs Litera
- Smokeball vs Rocket Matter
- Smokeball vs Secure Privacy
- Smokeball vs Tabs3
- Smokeball vs Clio
- Smokeball vs CosmoLex
- Smokeball vs Actionstep
- Smokeball vs Aderant
- Smokeball vs iManage
- Smokeball vs Docketwise
- Smokeball vs Didomi
