Legal · head to head
CASEpeer vs Tabs3

CASEpeer
Legal
Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms
- From
- $79/month
- Rated
- -

Tabs3
Legal
Billing, trust and general ledger accounting for small and mid-sized US law firms
- From
- $69/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CASEpeer it is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.; Tabs3 the interface follows Windows desktop conventions from an earlier era, so new fee earners and staff take longer to train than they would on a browser-based competitor.
- They diverge on capability: CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Tabs3 covers Tabs3 Billing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CASEpeer and Tabs3 actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Per user per month), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CASEpeer
- Intake and case screening
- Medical treatment tracking
- Settlement and lien management
- Negotiation tracking
- Statute of limitations monitoring
Only in Tabs3
- Tabs3 Billing
- Trust accounting
- General ledger and accounts payable
- PracticeMaster
- On-premises or cloud subscription
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CASEpeer
- Plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien trackingnot Tabs3
- Contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one placenot Tabs3
- Personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measurednot Tabs3
- Firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseloadnot Tabs3
Tabs3
- Small firms billing hourly that want billing and the firm general ledger in one system rather than reconciling twonot CASEpeer
- Practices that must run three-way trust reconciliation without a separate bookkeeping packagenot CASEpeer
- Firms that need an on-premises deployment because of client or insurer restrictions on cloud-hosted matter datanot CASEpeer
- Long-established practices replacing a decades-old billing system while keeping accounting in housenot CASEpeer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CASEpeer
- It is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.
- There is no full double-entry general ledger, so the firm still needs separate accounting software and somebody to reconcile between the two.
- The narrow personal injury focus means a practice that diversifies into family, employment or criminal work has to run a second system or migrate.
- It has changed corporate hands three times since 2021, from independent to MyCase to AffiniPay, now trading as 8am, so roadmap continuity is a fair question to put to the vendor.
- Sitting in the 8am group aligns it with LawPay and MyCase, so firms committed to a different payments provider get less from the integrations.
Tabs3
- The interface follows Windows desktop conventions from an earlier era, so new fee earners and staff take longer to train than they would on a browser-based competitor.
- On-premises deployment puts backup, disaster recovery, server upgrades and patching on the firm, which small practices without IT support routinely underestimate.
- It is built around hourly and flat fee billing, so a contingency practice tracking case costs and settlement disbursements will find the case financial model a poor fit.
- PracticeMaster case management is priced separately from billing, so the advertised per-user rate is not what a firm wanting matter management actually pays.
- Choosing the on-premises option no longer avoids a subscription, because it is billed per user per month like the hosted version.
Pricing, plan by plan
CASEpeer
$79/month- Basic$79/month
- Personal injury case management
- Intake and treatment tracking
- No minimum seat count
- Pro$119/month
- Adds reporting and automation
- Lien and settlement tracking
- No long-term contract required
- Advanced$149/month
- Full feature set
- Advanced reporting
- No long-term contract required
Tabs3
$69/month- OnSite Subscription$69/month
- Deployed on the firm server
- Billing, trust accounting and general ledger
- PracticeMaster add-on at 32 USD per user per month
- Tabs3 Cloud$89/month
- Hosted by the vendor
- Billing, trust accounting and general ledger
- PracticeMaster add-on at 35 USD per user per month
Which should you pick?
Choose CASEpeer if
- You need intake and case screening.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want medical treatment tracking.
Choose Tabs3 if
- You need tabs3 billing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want trust accounting.
Questions people ask
- Is CASEpeer or Tabs3 better?
- Neither clearly leads. CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Tabs3 at $69/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CASEpeer or Tabs3?
- CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Tabs3 at $69/month.
- Does CASEpeer or Tabs3 run on more platforms?
- CASEpeer runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tabs3 runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- What is CASEpeer best used for?
- CASEpeer is most often used for plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking, contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place, personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measured, firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseload. Of those, plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking and contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place are not what Tabs3 is typically brought in for.
- What can CASEpeer do that Tabs3 cannot?
- CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Medical treatment tracking, Settlement and lien management, Negotiation tracking. Tabs3 covers Tabs3 Billing, Trust accounting, General ledger and accounts payable, PracticeMaster.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CASEpeer: Is CASEpeer suitable for a corporate or defence firm?
No. It is built around contingency personal injury work: treatment, liens and settlement. A corporate firm billing hourly should look at Clio, Tabs3 or a large firm system instead.
Tabs3: Is Tabs3 right for a personal injury firm working on contingency?
No. It is built for hourly and flat fee billing with a firm general ledger. A contingency practice needs case cost tracking and settlement disbursement handling, which is what CASEpeer and Filevine are built around.
CASEpeer: What does CASEpeer cost?
Published per-user rates are 79 USD for Basic, 119 USD for Pro and 149 USD for Advanced per month, with no minimum seat count and no long-term contract required.
Tabs3: Can I still buy Tabs3 as a perpetual licence?
No published perpetual price exists. The on-premises option, called OnSite Subscription, starts at 69 USD per user per month, with the hosted Tabs3 Cloud starting at 89 USD per user per month.
CASEpeer: Who owns CASEpeer?
It was acquired by MyCase in March 2021 and moved to AffiniPay in June 2022. AffiniPay rebranded to 8am in August 2025, so CASEpeer now sits alongside MyCase and LawPay in that group.
Tabs3: Does it replace QuickBooks?
For most firms yes. It includes a double-entry general ledger and accounts payable, which is the usual reason firms choose it over billing-only products.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CASEpeer vs Filevine
- CASEpeer vs Clio
- CASEpeer vs MyCase
- CASEpeer vs LexisNexis
- CASEpeer vs Docketwise
- CASEpeer vs Litify
- CASEpeer vs Relativity
- CASEpeer vs Everlaw
- CASEpeer vs Smokeball
- CASEpeer vs Logikcull
- CASEpeer vs DISCO
- CASEpeer vs iManage
- CASEpeer vs Intapp
- CASEpeer vs Litera
- CASEpeer vs Rocket Matter
- CASEpeer vs Secure Privacy
- CASEpeer vs CosmoLex
- CASEpeer vs Aderant
- CASEpeer vs Actionstep
- CASEpeer vs Ironclad
- CASEpeer vs Westlaw
- CASEpeer vs Lawmatics
- CASEpeer vs Cookiebot
- CASEpeer vs Harvey
- Tabs3 vs Filevine
- Tabs3 vs Clio
- Tabs3 vs MyCase
- Tabs3 vs LexisNexis
- Tabs3 vs Docketwise
- Tabs3 vs Litify
- Tabs3 vs Relativity
- Tabs3 vs Everlaw
- Tabs3 vs Smokeball
- Tabs3 vs Logikcull
- Tabs3 vs DISCO
- Tabs3 vs iManage
- Tabs3 vs Intapp
- Tabs3 vs Litera
- Tabs3 vs Rocket Matter
- Tabs3 vs Secure Privacy
- Tabs3 vs CosmoLex
- Tabs3 vs Aderant
- Tabs3 vs Actionstep
- Tabs3 vs Ironclad
- Tabs3 vs Westlaw
- Tabs3 vs Lawmatics
- Tabs3 vs Cookiebot
- Tabs3 vs Harvey
